Considerations about the quality of UML and GML application schemas

IF 0.3 Q4 REMOTE SENSING
A. Chojka
{"title":"Considerations about the quality of UML and GML application schemas","authors":"A. Chojka","doi":"10.2478/rgg-2020-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Exchange of and access to spatial data is the principal goal of any Spatial Data Infrastructure, therefore, one of the key concepts of SDI is interoperability, especially semantic and syntactic. Whereas application schemas and quality issues are one of the aspects that have to be considered to ensure a successful data interchange in SDI. Two types of application schema are widely used in the European SDI as well as in the Polish SDI. They cover both semantic and syntactic interoperability and are an integral parts of spatial data specifications and relevant regulations in the form of data models. However, working out accurate and correct application schemas may be a challenge. Additionally, faulty or too complex application schemas can influence the ability for valid data interchange, and consequently, prevent achieving interoperability within SDI. Therefore, the capability to examine and estimate the UML and GML application schemas quality seems to be a worthwhile and important issue in the context of semantic and syntactic interoperability in SDI. The main subject of this article it to set out the context of performed studies, among others, the role of application schema in the interoperable data exchange, issues related to the concept of quality and its measures.","PeriodicalId":42010,"journal":{"name":"Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics","volume":"52 1","pages":"17 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/rgg-2020-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Exchange of and access to spatial data is the principal goal of any Spatial Data Infrastructure, therefore, one of the key concepts of SDI is interoperability, especially semantic and syntactic. Whereas application schemas and quality issues are one of the aspects that have to be considered to ensure a successful data interchange in SDI. Two types of application schema are widely used in the European SDI as well as in the Polish SDI. They cover both semantic and syntactic interoperability and are an integral parts of spatial data specifications and relevant regulations in the form of data models. However, working out accurate and correct application schemas may be a challenge. Additionally, faulty or too complex application schemas can influence the ability for valid data interchange, and consequently, prevent achieving interoperability within SDI. Therefore, the capability to examine and estimate the UML and GML application schemas quality seems to be a worthwhile and important issue in the context of semantic and syntactic interoperability in SDI. The main subject of this article it to set out the context of performed studies, among others, the role of application schema in the interoperable data exchange, issues related to the concept of quality and its measures.
关于UML和GML应用程序模式质量的考虑
空间数据的交换和访问是任何空间数据基础设施的主要目标,因此,空间数据基础设施的关键概念之一是互操作性,特别是语义和句法的互操作性。而应用程序模式和质量问题是必须考虑的方面之一,以确保在SDI中成功进行数据交换。在欧洲SDI和波兰SDI中广泛使用两种类型的应用程序模式。它们涵盖语义和语法互操作性,是空间数据规范和数据模型形式的相关规则的组成部分。然而,制定准确和正确的应用程序模式可能是一个挑战。此外,错误的或过于复杂的应用程序模式会影响有效数据交换的能力,从而妨碍在SDI中实现互操作性。因此,在SDI的语义和语法互操作性上下文中,检查和评估UML和GML应用程序模式质量的能力似乎是一个有价值且重要的问题。本文的主要主题是列出所进行研究的背景,其中包括应用程序模式在可互操作数据交换中的作用,与质量概念及其度量相关的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
28.60%
发文量
5
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信