{"title":"From Nimble NIMBY to Palpable PIMBY: Anti-Blackness in George Deukmejian’s California Prison Boom","authors":"Jakob Hollenbeck","doi":"10.5399/uo/ourj/17.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When California Governor George Deukmejian assumed office in 1983, the state had not added to its twelve prisons in eighteen years. During his two terms, Deukmejian oversaw the construction of eight prisons — a 67% increase in eight years. This paper attempts to locate the impetus of this prison boom by analyzing three siting struggles in southern California. It argues that past scholarship fails to account for the interaction between the state and sited communities. Specifically, state-centered research fails to account for the power of city officials while rural-centered research fails to account for systemic factors. Accordingly, this paper introduces the term Please in Your Back Yard (PIYBY) to examine where and why the state sited a prison and how they tried to convince the community to accept it. PIYBYism complements the existing Not in My Back Yardism (NIMBYism) and Please in My Back Yardism (PIMBYism). The paper analyzes the interaction between the three terms, revealing that ideological, not economic concerns, caused the California prison boom. The prison boom emerged from a tough-on-crime moment — one that was necessarily anti-black. The three siting battles support this conclusion because anti-blackness permeated every group’s rhetoric. This paper, then, challenges the subject’s prevailing scholarship: politics lies at the base of the prison system. Even if one accepts the economic link, the economy only mattered in that it exacerbated an ongoing political movement that attempted to reassert white supremacy.","PeriodicalId":93630,"journal":{"name":"Vanderbilt undergraduate research journal : VURJ","volume":"49 1","pages":"52-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vanderbilt undergraduate research journal : VURJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5399/uo/ourj/17.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
When California Governor George Deukmejian assumed office in 1983, the state had not added to its twelve prisons in eighteen years. During his two terms, Deukmejian oversaw the construction of eight prisons — a 67% increase in eight years. This paper attempts to locate the impetus of this prison boom by analyzing three siting struggles in southern California. It argues that past scholarship fails to account for the interaction between the state and sited communities. Specifically, state-centered research fails to account for the power of city officials while rural-centered research fails to account for systemic factors. Accordingly, this paper introduces the term Please in Your Back Yard (PIYBY) to examine where and why the state sited a prison and how they tried to convince the community to accept it. PIYBYism complements the existing Not in My Back Yardism (NIMBYism) and Please in My Back Yardism (PIMBYism). The paper analyzes the interaction between the three terms, revealing that ideological, not economic concerns, caused the California prison boom. The prison boom emerged from a tough-on-crime moment — one that was necessarily anti-black. The three siting battles support this conclusion because anti-blackness permeated every group’s rhetoric. This paper, then, challenges the subject’s prevailing scholarship: politics lies at the base of the prison system. Even if one accepts the economic link, the economy only mattered in that it exacerbated an ongoing political movement that attempted to reassert white supremacy.
1983年,当加州州长乔治·德克梅吉安(George Deukmejian)上任时,该州已有18年没有增加监狱。在他的两届任期内,杜克梅吉安监督了八所监狱的建设——八年内增加了67%。本文试图通过对南加州三起监狱选址斗争的分析,来定位这种监狱繁荣的动力。它认为,过去的学术研究未能解释国家和被安置社区之间的相互作用。具体来说,以国家为中心的研究没有考虑到城市官员的权力,而以农村为中心的研究没有考虑到系统因素。因此,本文引入了“请进你的后院”(Please in Your backyard,简称PIYBY)一词,来考察该州在哪里、为什么要建监狱,以及他们是如何说服社区接受监狱的。“邻避主义”和“请进我家后院主义”是对现有“邻避主义”和“请进我家后院主义”的补充。本文分析了这三个术语之间的相互作用,揭示了意识形态问题,而不是经济问题,导致了加州监狱的繁荣。监狱数量的激增源于严厉打击犯罪的时刻——一个必然是反黑人的时刻。三场选址战支持了这一结论,因为反黑人渗透到每个群体的言论中。因此,本文对这一主题的主流学术观点提出了挑战:政治是监狱系统的基础。即使人们接受这种经济联系,经济的重要性也只在于它加剧了一场正在进行的试图重申白人至上主义的政治运动。