Conspicuous by Their Presence: Brutus, Cassius, and Cato the Younger in the Writings of Tacitus

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
POLIS Pub Date : 2022-05-11 DOI:10.1163/20512996-12340369
Thomas E. Strunk
{"title":"Conspicuous by Their Presence: Brutus, Cassius, and Cato the Younger in the Writings of Tacitus","authors":"Thomas E. Strunk","doi":"10.1163/20512996-12340369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nTacitus is an unlikely source for our study of Brutus, Cassius, and Cato, as they stand outside the chronological framework of Tacitus’ writings; nonetheless, they do appear a number of times throughout his works, and Tacitus portrays them with nuance and significance. As Brutus, Cassius, and Cato are rarely the precise focus for Tacitus, they are often referred to obliquely or in dialogue or speeches typically regarding treason and liberty. This paper will explore Tacitus’ depiction of Brutus, Cassius, and Cato in his major and minor works, including the oblique references to Cato, Brutus as an orator and writer, Brutus and Cassius as commanders in civil war, and lastly their memory as it pertains to liberty and treason. Tacitus’ contribution to our understanding of Brutus, Cassius, and Cato comes from both his own use of them as markers of political memory and liberty and his examination of how others used Brutus, Cassius, and Cato to make arguments for political liberty or for the basis of accusations of treason.","PeriodicalId":43237,"journal":{"name":"POLIS","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POLIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340369","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tacitus is an unlikely source for our study of Brutus, Cassius, and Cato, as they stand outside the chronological framework of Tacitus’ writings; nonetheless, they do appear a number of times throughout his works, and Tacitus portrays them with nuance and significance. As Brutus, Cassius, and Cato are rarely the precise focus for Tacitus, they are often referred to obliquely or in dialogue or speeches typically regarding treason and liberty. This paper will explore Tacitus’ depiction of Brutus, Cassius, and Cato in his major and minor works, including the oblique references to Cato, Brutus as an orator and writer, Brutus and Cassius as commanders in civil war, and lastly their memory as it pertains to liberty and treason. Tacitus’ contribution to our understanding of Brutus, Cassius, and Cato comes from both his own use of them as markers of political memory and liberty and his examination of how others used Brutus, Cassius, and Cato to make arguments for political liberty or for the basis of accusations of treason.
引人注目的存在:塔西佗著作中的布鲁图斯、卡西乌斯和小加图
塔西佗不太可能是我们研究布鲁图、卡修斯和加图的来源,因为他们站在塔西佗作品的时间框架之外;尽管如此,它们确实在他的作品中出现了很多次,塔西佗用细微的差别和意义来描绘它们。由于布鲁图斯、卡西乌斯和卡托很少是塔西佗关注的焦点,他们经常被间接地或在对话或演讲中提到,通常是关于叛国和自由的。本文将探讨塔西佗在他的主要和次要作品中对布鲁图、卡修斯和卡托的描述,包括间接提到卡托、布鲁图是演说家和作家,布鲁图和卡修斯是内战中的指挥官,最后是他们的记忆,因为它与自由和叛国有关。塔西佗对我们理解布鲁图、卡修斯和卡托的贡献,一方面来自于他自己将布鲁图、卡修斯和卡托作为政治记忆和自由的标志,另一方面来自于他对其他人如何利用布鲁图、卡修斯和卡托来论证政治自由或指控叛国罪的依据的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
POLIS
POLIS CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信