Non-Negative Matrix Factorization Based Input Function Extraction for Mouse Imaging in Small Animal PET - Comparison with Arterial Blood Sampling and Factor Analysis

Dominik Schulz, A. Tapfer, A. Buck, S. Reeder, M. Miederer, E. Weidl, S. Ziegler, M. Schwaiger, R. Bundschuh
{"title":"Non-Negative Matrix Factorization Based Input Function Extraction for Mouse Imaging in Small Animal PET - Comparison with Arterial Blood Sampling and Factor Analysis","authors":"Dominik Schulz, A. Tapfer, A. Buck, S. Reeder, M. Miederer, E. Weidl, S. Ziegler, M. Schwaiger, R. Bundschuh","doi":"10.4172/2155-9937.1000108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Retrieving the accurate time-tracer activity concentration curve of the blood (arterial input function) is mandatory for performing bio kinetic model analysis of dynamic PET data. Especially in small rodents, gathering the input function remains an active area of research as no generally applicable solution was found so far. While surgically catheterizing blood vessels of rodents is possible, it is labour intensive and time resolution of blood sampling is restricted due to the limited amount of overall blood and the procedure of blood withdrawal itself. Obtaining the input function from the PET images themselves seems thus to be favourable, but suffers from several factors, one of them being spill-in of adjacent tissues. Particularly in mice and for [18F]FDG, the spill-in complicates using the time-activity curve (TAC) from a region of interest (ROI) over the left ventricle (LV) because the signal of the ROI contains contributions from both, myocardial uptake as well as arterial blood activity. We propose non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) as an image based algorithm for separating myocardial tracer concentration from the blood input function. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of NMF as an image based algorithm for retrieving the input function by comparison with blood sampling and Factor Analysis (FA). Method: The femoral arteries of eight mice were surgically catheterized. With the injection of [18F]FDG, a 60 minute PET scan was started during which arterial blood samples were manually drawn from the catheter. For analysis, NMF and FA were performed in a ROI placed over the LV. The NMF algorithm shares similarities with principal component analysis and FA, the advantage over the later two being its non-negativity constraint. For normalization of the NMF extracted curve, the peak value of tracer activity in an early image of the LV and a late blood sample was used. The normalized NMF curve was visually compared to the TAC retrieved from the blood samples and to the FA retrieved TAC. For a quantitative comparison of performance, Pearson correlation and square-root of sum of squares (RSS) between NMF/FA and blood sampling curves was calculated. Results: TAC based on NMF, FA and arterial blood samples were obtained and compared in all 8 mice. The NMF derived curves described the blood sampling based curves visually significantly better than FA. Pearson correlation between NMF and blood sampling curves ranged from 0.21 to 0.92 with an average of 0.69. Pearson correlation for FA ranged from 0.46 to 0.81 with an average of 0.65. Mean RSS was 2.70E + 006 for NMF and 3.40E + 006 for FA. Conclusion: In the examined parameters, visual accordance, Pearson correlation and RSS, NMF performs superior to FA and seems to be a promising method for the extraction of the input function from PET images of small rodents without the need for arterial blood sampling.","PeriodicalId":89157,"journal":{"name":"International journal of molecular imaging","volume":"46 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of molecular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9937.1000108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Objectives: Retrieving the accurate time-tracer activity concentration curve of the blood (arterial input function) is mandatory for performing bio kinetic model analysis of dynamic PET data. Especially in small rodents, gathering the input function remains an active area of research as no generally applicable solution was found so far. While surgically catheterizing blood vessels of rodents is possible, it is labour intensive and time resolution of blood sampling is restricted due to the limited amount of overall blood and the procedure of blood withdrawal itself. Obtaining the input function from the PET images themselves seems thus to be favourable, but suffers from several factors, one of them being spill-in of adjacent tissues. Particularly in mice and for [18F]FDG, the spill-in complicates using the time-activity curve (TAC) from a region of interest (ROI) over the left ventricle (LV) because the signal of the ROI contains contributions from both, myocardial uptake as well as arterial blood activity. We propose non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) as an image based algorithm for separating myocardial tracer concentration from the blood input function. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of NMF as an image based algorithm for retrieving the input function by comparison with blood sampling and Factor Analysis (FA). Method: The femoral arteries of eight mice were surgically catheterized. With the injection of [18F]FDG, a 60 minute PET scan was started during which arterial blood samples were manually drawn from the catheter. For analysis, NMF and FA were performed in a ROI placed over the LV. The NMF algorithm shares similarities with principal component analysis and FA, the advantage over the later two being its non-negativity constraint. For normalization of the NMF extracted curve, the peak value of tracer activity in an early image of the LV and a late blood sample was used. The normalized NMF curve was visually compared to the TAC retrieved from the blood samples and to the FA retrieved TAC. For a quantitative comparison of performance, Pearson correlation and square-root of sum of squares (RSS) between NMF/FA and blood sampling curves was calculated. Results: TAC based on NMF, FA and arterial blood samples were obtained and compared in all 8 mice. The NMF derived curves described the blood sampling based curves visually significantly better than FA. Pearson correlation between NMF and blood sampling curves ranged from 0.21 to 0.92 with an average of 0.69. Pearson correlation for FA ranged from 0.46 to 0.81 with an average of 0.65. Mean RSS was 2.70E + 006 for NMF and 3.40E + 006 for FA. Conclusion: In the examined parameters, visual accordance, Pearson correlation and RSS, NMF performs superior to FA and seems to be a promising method for the extraction of the input function from PET images of small rodents without the need for arterial blood sampling.
基于非负矩阵分解的小动物PET小鼠成像输入函数提取——与动脉血采样及因子分析的比较
目的:获取准确的血液时间示踪剂活性浓度曲线(动脉输入函数)是对动态PET数据进行生物动力学模型分析的必要条件。特别是在小型啮齿动物中,收集输入函数仍然是一个活跃的研究领域,因为迄今为止还没有找到普遍适用的解决方案。虽然可以对啮齿类动物的血管进行手术插管,但这是一项劳动密集型的工作,而且由于总血量有限和抽血本身的程序,血液采样的时间分辨率受到限制。因此,从PET图像本身获得输入函数似乎是有利的,但受到几个因素的影响,其中之一是邻近组织的溢出。特别是在小鼠和[18F]FDG中,使用来自左心室(LV)上方感兴趣区域(ROI)的时间-活动曲线(TAC),溢出变得复杂,因为ROI的信号包含心肌摄取和动脉血液活动两方面的贡献。我们提出非负矩阵分解(NMF)作为一种基于图像的算法,用于从血液输入函数中分离心肌示踪剂浓度。本研究的目的是通过与血液采样和因子分析(FA)进行比较,评估NMF作为一种基于图像的输入函数检索算法的潜力。方法:对8只小鼠的股动脉进行手术置管。注射[18F]FDG后,开始进行60分钟的PET扫描,期间手工从导管中抽取动脉血样本。为了进行分析,NMF和FA在放置在LV上的ROI中进行。NMF算法与主成分分析和FA有相似之处,优于后两者的优点是其非负性约束。为了使NMF提取曲线归一化,我们使用了早期左室图像和晚期血液样本中示踪剂活性的峰值。将归一化的NMF曲线与从血液样本中提取的TAC和从FA中提取的TAC进行直观比较。为了定量比较性能,计算NMF/FA与血液采样曲线之间的Pearson相关性和平方和的平方根(RSS)。结果:8只小鼠均获得了基于NMF、FA和动脉血样本的TAC,并进行了比较。NMF导出的曲线在视觉上比FA更好地描述了基于血液采样的曲线。NMF与采血曲线的Pearson相关性为0.21 ~ 0.92,平均值为0.69。FA的Pearson相关性为0.46 ~ 0.81,平均为0.65。NMF的平均RSS为2.70E + 006, FA的平均RSS为3.40E + 006。结论:在检测参数、视觉一致性、Pearson相关性和RSS方面,NMF优于FA,是一种很有前途的方法,可以在不需要动脉采血的情况下从小型啮齿动物的PET图像中提取输入函数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书