Bridging Compressor and Expander Technologies in SSLNG Processes

Michael Drewes, Tushar Patel
{"title":"Bridging Compressor and Expander Technologies in SSLNG Processes","authors":"Michael Drewes, Tushar Patel","doi":"10.2118/197260-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Today, small-scale liquified natural gas (SSLNG) plants are planned and built in different areas around the globe. Due to the overall market situation and competition, these projects are challenged to decrease capital expenditure (CAPEX), while becoming increasingly efficient to meet mid-size investors' operating expenditure (OPEX) targets and return on investment (ROI) expectations. The main challenges are the overall efficiency of the plant, seal leakage rates, operational flexibility and the plant's space limitations.\n To a big extent, the aforementioned points are closely connected to liquefaction technology selection (either single mixed refrigeration or nitrogen Brayton cycle) as well as the rotating equipment used: Firstly, regarding energy use, the refrigeration compressor is the main power consumer in an SSLNG plant (in addition to pumps and smaller compressors). Secondly, a large amount of process leakage is linked to the seals of the rotating equipment. Regarding the third point, operational flexibility, this parameter is closely related to the deployed compressor and expander, and their respective process characteristics. Lastly, the footprint and equipment size have an impact on the installation costs and ultimately CAPEX.\n Often, especially in a nitrogen Brayton cycle, compressors as well as warm and cold turboexpanders are supplied as single skid each: that is, a nitrogen compressor skid as well as both warm and cold expander compressors installed on another skid. To reach their future objectives, some SSLNG plant operators are taking new approaches that combine these two technologies: compressor and expander applications are installed on one single gearbox and skid – this is called a Compander. This approach is already used in other industry segments and applications, including LNG carriers. Atlas Copco's first land-based LNG refrigeration Compander was installed back in 2002 at a plant in Norway. The Compander design allows for only one gearbox on which compressor and expander stages are mounted, one oil system, one control system and one seal gas panel – instead of having all of these components twice. By applying these bridging technologies, SSLNG plants are finding new ways to improve OPEX while at the same time reducing the financial burden on new projects. In this case study, we discuss how SSLNG plants in Norway and customers in other places have implemented Atlas Copco Gas and Process integrally geared technology that merges the functions of a centrifugal compressor and turboexpander into one compact Compander unit. In addition, different configurations of separate compressors and expanders are discussed and compared to a single-skid (Compander) solution.\n During the discussion, the benefits of a Compander compared to single and separate equipment designs are evaluated.","PeriodicalId":11328,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/197260-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Today, small-scale liquified natural gas (SSLNG) plants are planned and built in different areas around the globe. Due to the overall market situation and competition, these projects are challenged to decrease capital expenditure (CAPEX), while becoming increasingly efficient to meet mid-size investors' operating expenditure (OPEX) targets and return on investment (ROI) expectations. The main challenges are the overall efficiency of the plant, seal leakage rates, operational flexibility and the plant's space limitations. To a big extent, the aforementioned points are closely connected to liquefaction technology selection (either single mixed refrigeration or nitrogen Brayton cycle) as well as the rotating equipment used: Firstly, regarding energy use, the refrigeration compressor is the main power consumer in an SSLNG plant (in addition to pumps and smaller compressors). Secondly, a large amount of process leakage is linked to the seals of the rotating equipment. Regarding the third point, operational flexibility, this parameter is closely related to the deployed compressor and expander, and their respective process characteristics. Lastly, the footprint and equipment size have an impact on the installation costs and ultimately CAPEX. Often, especially in a nitrogen Brayton cycle, compressors as well as warm and cold turboexpanders are supplied as single skid each: that is, a nitrogen compressor skid as well as both warm and cold expander compressors installed on another skid. To reach their future objectives, some SSLNG plant operators are taking new approaches that combine these two technologies: compressor and expander applications are installed on one single gearbox and skid – this is called a Compander. This approach is already used in other industry segments and applications, including LNG carriers. Atlas Copco's first land-based LNG refrigeration Compander was installed back in 2002 at a plant in Norway. The Compander design allows for only one gearbox on which compressor and expander stages are mounted, one oil system, one control system and one seal gas panel – instead of having all of these components twice. By applying these bridging technologies, SSLNG plants are finding new ways to improve OPEX while at the same time reducing the financial burden on new projects. In this case study, we discuss how SSLNG plants in Norway and customers in other places have implemented Atlas Copco Gas and Process integrally geared technology that merges the functions of a centrifugal compressor and turboexpander into one compact Compander unit. In addition, different configurations of separate compressors and expanders are discussed and compared to a single-skid (Compander) solution. During the discussion, the benefits of a Compander compared to single and separate equipment designs are evaluated.
在SSLNG过程中桥接压缩机和膨胀器技术
如今,小型液化天然气(SSLNG)工厂正在全球不同地区规划和建造。由于整体市场形势和竞争,这些项目面临着降低资本支出(CAPEX)的挑战,同时变得越来越高效,以满足中型投资者的运营支出(OPEX)目标和投资回报率(ROI)预期。主要的挑战是工厂的整体效率、密封泄漏率、操作灵活性和工厂的空间限制。在很大程度上,上述几点与液化技术的选择(无论是单混合制冷还是氮气布雷顿循环)以及所使用的旋转设备密切相关:首先,在能源使用方面,制冷压缩机是SSLNG装置的主要电力消耗者(除了泵和小型压缩机)。其次,大量的工艺泄漏与旋转设备的密封有关。关于第三点操作灵活性,该参数与所部署的压缩机和膨胀机及其各自的工艺特性密切相关。最后,占地面积和设备尺寸会影响安装成本和最终的资本支出。通常,特别是在氮气布雷顿循环中,压缩机以及冷热涡轮膨胀机作为单个撬片提供:也就是说,一个氮气压缩机撬片以及安装在另一个撬片上的冷热膨胀机压缩机。为了实现他们未来的目标,一些SSLNG工厂运营商正在采用结合这两种技术的新方法:将压缩机和膨胀器应用安装在一个变速箱和滑块上,这被称为Compander。这种方法已经在其他行业和应用中使用,包括液化天然气运输船。阿特拉斯·科普柯的第一台陆基液化天然气制冷压缩机于2002年在挪威的一家工厂安装。Compander的设计只允许安装一个变速箱(压缩机和膨胀级)、一个油系统、一个控制系统和一个密封气面板,而不是将所有这些组件安装两次。通过应用这些桥接技术,SSLNG工厂正在寻找新的方法来提高运营成本,同时减少新项目的财务负担。在本案例研究中,我们将讨论挪威的SSLNG工厂和其他地方的客户如何实施阿特拉斯·科普柯气体与过程一体化齿轮传动技术,该技术将离心式压缩机和涡轮膨胀机的功能整合到一个紧凑的Compander装置中。此外,还讨论了不同配置的独立压缩机和膨胀器,并将其与单撬(Compander)解决方案进行了比较。在讨论过程中,比较了对比器与单个和独立设备设计的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信