Cultural Methods for Aflatoxin Detection

H. Abbas, W. Shier, B. Horn, M. Weaver
{"title":"Cultural Methods for Aflatoxin Detection","authors":"H. Abbas, W. Shier, B. Horn, M. Weaver","doi":"10.1081/TXR-200027854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aflatoxins present important food safely problems in both developed and developing countries. Contamination is monitored in developed countries using enzyme‐linked immunusorbent assay (ELISA)‐ and high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)‐based assays, both of which may be too expensive for routine use in many developing countries. There is a need for inexpensive alternative approaches to detect aflatoxins in lots of foods and feeds. Reviewed here are culture‐based methods that determine if a sample is contaminated with aflatoxigenic fungi. These approaches include 1) blue fluorescence of aflatoxin B1, particularly when enhanced by including β‐cyclodextrin in the culture medium, 2) yellow pigment production, and 3) color change on exposure to ammonium hydroxide vapor. The presence of aflatoxin B1 can be detected by its blue fluorescence, which is enhanced when the toxin complexes with the hydrophobic pocket of β‐cyclodextrin. The yellow pigment and ammonium hydroxide vapor tests are based on the production of yellow anthraquinone biosynthetic intermediates in the aflatoxin pathway. These compounds act as pH indicator dyes, which are more visible when they have turned red at alkaline pH. Because these tests are based on two different mechanisms, it has been possible to combine them into a single test. In a study of 517 A. flavus isolates from the Mississippi Delta, the combined assay reduced false positives for aflatoxigenicity to 0%, and false negatives to 7%. The increased predictive power of the combined cultural assay may enable its use for inexpensively identifying potential aflatoxin contamination in feeds and foods.","PeriodicalId":17561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology-toxin Reviews","volume":"6 1","pages":"295 - 315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"87","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology-toxin Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1081/TXR-200027854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 87

Abstract

Aflatoxins present important food safely problems in both developed and developing countries. Contamination is monitored in developed countries using enzyme‐linked immunusorbent assay (ELISA)‐ and high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)‐based assays, both of which may be too expensive for routine use in many developing countries. There is a need for inexpensive alternative approaches to detect aflatoxins in lots of foods and feeds. Reviewed here are culture‐based methods that determine if a sample is contaminated with aflatoxigenic fungi. These approaches include 1) blue fluorescence of aflatoxin B1, particularly when enhanced by including β‐cyclodextrin in the culture medium, 2) yellow pigment production, and 3) color change on exposure to ammonium hydroxide vapor. The presence of aflatoxin B1 can be detected by its blue fluorescence, which is enhanced when the toxin complexes with the hydrophobic pocket of β‐cyclodextrin. The yellow pigment and ammonium hydroxide vapor tests are based on the production of yellow anthraquinone biosynthetic intermediates in the aflatoxin pathway. These compounds act as pH indicator dyes, which are more visible when they have turned red at alkaline pH. Because these tests are based on two different mechanisms, it has been possible to combine them into a single test. In a study of 517 A. flavus isolates from the Mississippi Delta, the combined assay reduced false positives for aflatoxigenicity to 0%, and false negatives to 7%. The increased predictive power of the combined cultural assay may enable its use for inexpensively identifying potential aflatoxin contamination in feeds and foods.
黄曲霉毒素检测的培养方法
黄曲霉毒素在发达国家和发展中国家都是重要的食品安全问题。发达国家使用酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)和高效液相色谱法(HPLC)监测污染,这两种方法在许多发展中国家常规使用可能过于昂贵。需要廉价的替代方法来检测许多食品和饲料中的黄曲霉毒素。这里回顾了基于培养的方法来确定样品是否被黄曲霉毒素真菌污染。这些方法包括1)黄曲霉毒素B1的蓝色荧光,特别是当在培养基中加入β‐环糊精时,2)黄色色素的产生,以及3)暴露于氢氧化铵蒸汽时的颜色变化。黄曲霉毒素B1的存在可通过其蓝色荧光检测,当毒素与β‐环糊精疏水袋配合时,其蓝色荧光增强。黄色色素和氢氧化铵蒸汽试验是基于黄曲霉毒素途径中黄色蒽醌类生物合成中间体的生产。这些化合物作为pH指示染料,当它们在碱性pH下变红时更明显。因为这些测试是基于两种不同的机制,所以有可能将它们合并为一个测试。在一项来自密西西比三角洲的517株黄曲霉菌株的研究中,联合检测将黄曲霉毒素毒性的假阳性降低到0%,假阴性降低到7%。联合培养试验预测能力的提高,可使其用于低成本地识别饲料和食品中潜在的黄曲霉毒素污染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信