{"title":"Determinacy and regularity properties for idealized forcings","authors":"Daisuke Ikegami","doi":"10.1002/malq.202100045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We show under <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>ZF</mi>\n <mo>+</mo>\n <mi>DC</mi>\n <mo>+</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>AD</mi>\n <mi>R</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\sf {ZF}+ \\sf {DC}+ \\sf {AD}_\\mathbb {R}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> that every set of reals is <i>I</i>-regular for any σ-ideal <i>I</i> on the Baire space <math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mi>ω</mi>\n <mi>ω</mi>\n </msup>\n <annotation>$\\omega ^{\\omega }$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> such that <math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>P</mi>\n <mi>I</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$\\mathbb {P}_I$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> is proper. This answers the question of Khomskii [7, Question 2.6.5]. We also show that the same conclusion holds under <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>ZF</mi>\n <mo>+</mo>\n <mi>DC</mi>\n <mo>+</mo>\n <msup>\n <mi>AD</mi>\n <mo>+</mo>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\sf {ZF}+ \\sf {DC}+ \\sf {AD}^+$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> if we additionally assume that the set of Borel codes for <i>I</i>-positive sets is <math>\n <semantics>\n <msubsup>\n <munder>\n <mi>Δ</mi>\n <mo>˜</mo>\n </munder>\n <mn>1</mn>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msubsup>\n <annotation>$\\undertilde{\\mathbf {\\Delta }}^2_1$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. If we do not assume <math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>DC</mi>\n <annotation>$\\sf {DC}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, the notion of properness becomes obscure as pointed out by Asperó and Karagila [1]. Using the notion of strong properness similar to the one introduced by Bagaria and Bosch [2], we show under <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>ZF</mi>\n <mo>+</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>DC</mi>\n <mi>R</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\sf {ZF}+ \\sf {DC}_{\\mathbb {R}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> without using <math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>DC</mi>\n <annotation>$\\sf {DC}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> that every set of reals is <i>I</i>-regular for any σ-ideal <i>I</i> on the Baire space <math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mi>ω</mi>\n <mi>ω</mi>\n </msup>\n <annotation>$\\omega ^{\\omega }$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> such that <math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>P</mi>\n <mi>I</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$\\mathbb {P}_I$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> is strongly proper assuming every set of reals is ∞-Borel and there is no ω<sub>1</sub>-sequence of distinct reals. In particular, the same conclusion holds in a Solovay model.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/malq.202100045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
We show under that every set of reals is I-regular for any σ-ideal I on the Baire space such that is proper. This answers the question of Khomskii [7, Question 2.6.5]. We also show that the same conclusion holds under if we additionally assume that the set of Borel codes for I-positive sets is . If we do not assume , the notion of properness becomes obscure as pointed out by Asperó and Karagila [1]. Using the notion of strong properness similar to the one introduced by Bagaria and Bosch [2], we show under without using that every set of reals is I-regular for any σ-ideal I on the Baire space such that is strongly proper assuming every set of reals is ∞-Borel and there is no ω1-sequence of distinct reals. In particular, the same conclusion holds in a Solovay model.