Correlations of Estimated Serum Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein and Isoprostane with Metabolic Syndrome Criteria between Metabolic Syndrome and Non-Metabolic Syndrome Subjects in Selangor

Nur Atiqah Auni Razali, Nur Amirah Shibraumalisi, Z. Ismail, S. H. Sheikh Abdul Kadir, Suraya Abdul Razak, R. R. Raja Shariff, T. A. Abdul Rahman
{"title":"Correlations of Estimated Serum Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein and Isoprostane with Metabolic Syndrome Criteria between Metabolic Syndrome and Non-Metabolic Syndrome Subjects in Selangor","authors":"Nur Atiqah Auni Razali, Nur Amirah Shibraumalisi, Z. Ismail, S. H. Sheikh Abdul Kadir, Suraya Abdul Razak, R. R. Raja Shariff, T. A. Abdul Rahman","doi":"10.31436/imjm.v22i3.2297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a global healthcare burden associated with increased risk of atherosclerosis (ATH). The relationship between atherogenic lipoprotein and oxidative stress biomarkers with clinical risk factors of MetS have not been fully explored.  Therefore, the objective of this study is to determine the correlation between small dense low-density lipoprotein (sdLDL-c) and isoprostane (ISP) with MetS criteria and comparing these biomarkers between MetS and non-MetS. Materials and Methods: This was a cross sectional study involving 67 MetS and 43 non-MetS diagnosed by JIS criteria 2009. Demographic details and anthropometric measurements were recorded. Blood samples were collected to analyse serum plasma glucose, direct LDL, calculated sdLDL-c and ISP. Results: Mean serum sdLDL-c and ISP levels were significantly higher among those with MetS compared to non-MetS (1.14+0.44 mmol/L vs 0.87±0.38 mmol/L respectively, p=0.005).  Similarly, mean serum ISP concentration was higher among MetS compared to non-MetS (884.40+602.69 ng/L vs 657.89±616.42 ng/L respectively, p= 0.054). sdLDL-c was positively correlated with TG in the MetS (Pearson correlation 0.501, p<.001) whilst HDL-c was positively correlated with sdLDL-c among the non-MetS (Pearson Correlation 0.422, p<.005). Conclusion: This study highlights the correlation between sdLDL-c and TG in among MetS, emphasizing the need to closely monitor and manage TG among this cohort to reduce the risk of ATH. It was also noted that HDL-c showed positive correlation with sdLDL-c among non-MetS. This discordant finding suggests that HDL-c itself may not be causally associated with cardiovascular benefits and that perhaps HDL-c subfractions may be a better approach to determine cardioprotective effects of HDL-c.","PeriodicalId":13474,"journal":{"name":"IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31436/imjm.v22i3.2297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a global healthcare burden associated with increased risk of atherosclerosis (ATH). The relationship between atherogenic lipoprotein and oxidative stress biomarkers with clinical risk factors of MetS have not been fully explored.  Therefore, the objective of this study is to determine the correlation between small dense low-density lipoprotein (sdLDL-c) and isoprostane (ISP) with MetS criteria and comparing these biomarkers between MetS and non-MetS. Materials and Methods: This was a cross sectional study involving 67 MetS and 43 non-MetS diagnosed by JIS criteria 2009. Demographic details and anthropometric measurements were recorded. Blood samples were collected to analyse serum plasma glucose, direct LDL, calculated sdLDL-c and ISP. Results: Mean serum sdLDL-c and ISP levels were significantly higher among those with MetS compared to non-MetS (1.14+0.44 mmol/L vs 0.87±0.38 mmol/L respectively, p=0.005).  Similarly, mean serum ISP concentration was higher among MetS compared to non-MetS (884.40+602.69 ng/L vs 657.89±616.42 ng/L respectively, p= 0.054). sdLDL-c was positively correlated with TG in the MetS (Pearson correlation 0.501, p<.001) whilst HDL-c was positively correlated with sdLDL-c among the non-MetS (Pearson Correlation 0.422, p<.005). Conclusion: This study highlights the correlation between sdLDL-c and TG in among MetS, emphasizing the need to closely monitor and manage TG among this cohort to reduce the risk of ATH. It was also noted that HDL-c showed positive correlation with sdLDL-c among non-MetS. This discordant finding suggests that HDL-c itself may not be causally associated with cardiovascular benefits and that perhaps HDL-c subfractions may be a better approach to determine cardioprotective effects of HDL-c.
雪兰莪州代谢综合征和非代谢综合征受试者血清小密度低密度脂蛋白和异前列腺素与代谢综合征标准的相关性
代谢综合征(MetS)是与动脉粥样硬化(ATH)风险增加相关的全球医疗负担。动脉粥样硬化脂蛋白和氧化应激生物标志物与met临床危险因素之间的关系尚未得到充分探讨。因此,本研究的目的是确定小密度低密度脂蛋白(sdLDL-c)和异前列腺素(ISP)与MetS标准的相关性,并将这些生物标志物在MetS和非MetS之间进行比较。材料和方法:这是一项横断面研究,涉及67例MetS和43例根据JIS标准诊断的非MetS。记录了人口统计细节和人体测量数据。采集血样分析血清血糖、直接LDL、计算sdLDL-c和ISP。结果:MetS患者的平均血清sdLDL-c和ISP水平显著高于非MetS患者(分别为1.14+0.44 mmol/L vs 0.87±0.38 mmol/L, p=0.005)。同样,MetS患者的平均血清ISP浓度高于非MetS患者(分别为884.40+602.69 ng/L和657.89±616.42 ng/L, p= 0.054)。在met组中,sdLDL-c与TG呈正相关(Pearson相关性0.501,p< 0.001),而在非MetS组中,HDL-c与sdLDL-c呈正相关(Pearson相关性0.422,p< 0.001)。结论:本研究强调了MetS中sdLDL-c与TG之间的相关性,强调需要密切监测和管理该队列中的TG以降低ATH的风险。研究还发现,非mets患者的HDL-c与sdLDL-c呈正相关。这一不一致的发现表明HDL-c本身可能与心血管益处没有因果关系,也许HDL-c亚组分可能是确定HDL-c的心脏保护作用的更好方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信