PENGARUH METODE PEMBELAJARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SEJARAH SISWA

Nashar Nashar
{"title":"PENGARUH METODE PEMBELAJARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SEJARAH SISWA","authors":"Nashar Nashar","doi":"10.30870/candrasangkala.v1i1.746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to determine the effect of learning methods and critical thinking skills toward the students’ outcomes in the learning of history. This research is quantitative research using treatment design by level 2x2. The research data was taken from the observation, tests and questionnaires. The results showed that (1) learning of the history’s outcomes of students using investigative group learning are better than learning of the history’s outcomes using conventional teaching methods, (2) there is interaction between learning method and critical thinking ability toward learning of the history’s outcomes of students; (3) learning of the history’s outcomes of students using learning methods investigation group with high critical thinking skills are better than learners who learn using conventional learning methods, (4) learning of the history’s outcomes of students using conventional teaching methods with low critical thinking skills are better than students using the investigative group learning method with the ability to think critically low. Theoretically, the results of this study can be used as a reference for developing teaching methods in teaching history in the high school. Furthermore, there is research that is expected to use different teaching methods with other independent variables that influence student learning of history’s outcomes.","PeriodicalId":55726,"journal":{"name":"Candrasangkala Journal of Education and History","volume":"1 1","pages":"18-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Candrasangkala Journal of Education and History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30870/candrasangkala.v1i1.746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effect of learning methods and critical thinking skills toward the students’ outcomes in the learning of history. This research is quantitative research using treatment design by level 2x2. The research data was taken from the observation, tests and questionnaires. The results showed that (1) learning of the history’s outcomes of students using investigative group learning are better than learning of the history’s outcomes using conventional teaching methods, (2) there is interaction between learning method and critical thinking ability toward learning of the history’s outcomes of students; (3) learning of the history’s outcomes of students using learning methods investigation group with high critical thinking skills are better than learners who learn using conventional learning methods, (4) learning of the history’s outcomes of students using conventional teaching methods with low critical thinking skills are better than students using the investigative group learning method with the ability to think critically low. Theoretically, the results of this study can be used as a reference for developing teaching methods in teaching history in the high school. Furthermore, there is research that is expected to use different teaching methods with other independent variables that influence student learning of history’s outcomes.
批判性思维方式对学生历史学习结果的影响
本研究旨在探讨学习方法和批判性思维能力对学生历史学习成绩的影响。本研究采用2x2水平的治疗设计进行定量研究。研究数据来源于观察、测试和问卷调查。结果表明:(1)采用研究性小组学习的学生对历史成果的学习效果优于采用传统教学方法的学生;(2)学生对历史成果的学习方式与批判性思维能力之间存在交互作用;(3)批判性思维能力高的使用研究性学习方法的学生的历史学习成果优于使用常规学习方法的学生;(4)批判性思维能力低的使用常规教学方法的学生的历史学习成果优于使用研究性学习方法的学生,批判性思维能力低。从理论上讲,本研究的结果可以为高中历史教学方法的发展提供参考。此外,还有研究期望使用不同的教学方法和其他影响学生学习历史结果的自变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信