A comparison of the efficacy of varenicline and bupropion and an evaluation of the effect of the medications in the context of the smoking cessation programme.

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications Pub Date : 2017-02-01 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s12971-017-0116-0
Ali Ramazan Benli, Selman Erturhan, Muhammet Ali Oruc, Pinar Kalpakci, Didem Sunay, Yeltekin Demirel
{"title":"A comparison of the efficacy of varenicline and bupropion and an evaluation of the effect of the medications in the context of the smoking cessation programme.","authors":"Ali Ramazan Benli, Selman Erturhan, Muhammet Ali Oruc, Pinar Kalpakci, Didem Sunay, Yeltekin Demirel","doi":"10.1186/s12971-017-0116-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Within the context of the support program for smoking cessation, initiated by the Turkish Ministry of Health in 2011, those who present at 'smoking cessation' centres and are found to be suitable for pharmacological treatment are given varenicline and bupropion free of charge. As the smoking cessation programme is centralized, the selection of the medication is made randomly to provide a fixed distribution rate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of both varenicline and bupropion in smoking cessation and to evaluate the effect of the smoking cessation programme.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 405 individuals who met the study criteria were included in the study. Smoking habits and degree of dependence were determined in all the participants with the Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence (FTND) and bupropion or varenicline therapy was initiated in those who were eligible. Patients were followed up at 15 days then at 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months after smoking cessation. A level of CO < 5 ppm and 'point prevalence abstinence' were used as the criteria of success for smoking cessation and this evaluation showed the non-smoking status in the previous 7 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the participants was 35.19 ± 7.73 years and 82.8% (<i>n</i> = 334) were male. Of the participants, 60.2% (<i>n</i> = 244) were given varenicline and 39.8% (<i>n</i> = 161) bupropion. The mean FTND and package/year was not significantly different between the groups. The rates of success in the 1st and 2nd weeks, and 1st, 3rd and 6th months were significantly higher in the varenicline group than in the bupropion group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). At the end of one year, the rate of smoking cessation was determined as 13.9% (<i>n</i> = 34) in the varenicline group and 6.2% (<i>n</i> = 10) in the bupropion gruop. The difference was statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.015). At the end of 1 year when the previous 7 days smoking status was evaluated with the 'point prevalence abstinence' measurement as the success criteria, success rates were 20.5% with varenicline and 18.6% with bupropion and the difference was not significant (<i>p</i> = 0.646). The individuals who used the medications for 45 days or longer were more successful in smoking cessation (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The most common reasons given for discontinuing the medication were the side-effects (31.5%). No significant difference was determined between the groups in respect of the side-effects observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the rates of smoking cessation in all the other control points were higher with varenicline than with bupropion, no significant difference was found between the success rates of varenicline and bupropion used in smoking cessation based on the last 7 days at the end of one year. Those who used the medications for 45 days or longer were more successful in smoking cessation.</p>","PeriodicalId":44578,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications","volume":"30 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5286845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12971-017-0116-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Within the context of the support program for smoking cessation, initiated by the Turkish Ministry of Health in 2011, those who present at 'smoking cessation' centres and are found to be suitable for pharmacological treatment are given varenicline and bupropion free of charge. As the smoking cessation programme is centralized, the selection of the medication is made randomly to provide a fixed distribution rate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of both varenicline and bupropion in smoking cessation and to evaluate the effect of the smoking cessation programme.

Methods: A total of 405 individuals who met the study criteria were included in the study. Smoking habits and degree of dependence were determined in all the participants with the Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence (FTND) and bupropion or varenicline therapy was initiated in those who were eligible. Patients were followed up at 15 days then at 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months after smoking cessation. A level of CO < 5 ppm and 'point prevalence abstinence' were used as the criteria of success for smoking cessation and this evaluation showed the non-smoking status in the previous 7 days.

Results: The mean age of the participants was 35.19 ± 7.73 years and 82.8% (n = 334) were male. Of the participants, 60.2% (n = 244) were given varenicline and 39.8% (n = 161) bupropion. The mean FTND and package/year was not significantly different between the groups. The rates of success in the 1st and 2nd weeks, and 1st, 3rd and 6th months were significantly higher in the varenicline group than in the bupropion group (p < 0.05). At the end of one year, the rate of smoking cessation was determined as 13.9% (n = 34) in the varenicline group and 6.2% (n = 10) in the bupropion gruop. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.015). At the end of 1 year when the previous 7 days smoking status was evaluated with the 'point prevalence abstinence' measurement as the success criteria, success rates were 20.5% with varenicline and 18.6% with bupropion and the difference was not significant (p = 0.646). The individuals who used the medications for 45 days or longer were more successful in smoking cessation (p < 0.001). The most common reasons given for discontinuing the medication were the side-effects (31.5%). No significant difference was determined between the groups in respect of the side-effects observed.

Conclusions: Although the rates of smoking cessation in all the other control points were higher with varenicline than with bupropion, no significant difference was found between the success rates of varenicline and bupropion used in smoking cessation based on the last 7 days at the end of one year. Those who used the medications for 45 days or longer were more successful in smoking cessation.

比较伐尼克兰和安非他酮的疗效,评估药物在戒烟计划中的作用。
背景:土耳其卫生部于 2011 年启动了戒烟支持计划,在该计划框架内,凡到 "戒烟 "中心就诊并被认定适合接受药物治疗的患者,均可免费获得伐尼克兰和安非他酮。由于戒烟计划是集中进行的,因此药物的选择是随机的,以提供固定的分配率。本研究旨在评估伐尼克兰和安非他酮的戒烟疗效,并评估戒烟计划的效果:研究共纳入了 405 名符合研究标准的人员。通过法格斯托姆尼古丁依赖测试(FTND)确定了所有参与者的吸烟习惯和依赖程度,并对符合条件者开始使用安非他酮或伐尼克兰治疗。在戒烟 15 天后的 1、2、3、6 和 12 个月对患者进行随访。一氧化碳水平参与者的平均年龄为(35.19 ± 7.73)岁,82.8%(n = 334)为男性。参与者中,60.2%(n = 244)服用了伐尼克兰,39.8%(n = 161)服用了安非他酮。各组的平均戒烟年限(FTND)和包/年没有明显差异。在第 1 和第 2 周、第 1、第 3 和第 6 个月的成功率方面,伐尼克兰组明显高于安非他酮组,伐尼克兰组为 34%(n=34),安非他酮组为 6.2%(n=10)。差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.015)。一年后,以 "点戒烟率 "作为成功标准,对前 7 天的吸烟状况进行评估时,伐尼克兰组和安非他酮组的成功率分别为 20.5%和 18.6%,差异不显著(p = 0.646)。使用药物 45 天或更长时间的人戒烟成功率更高(p 结论:使用药物 45 天或更长时间的人戒烟成功率更高(p 结论:使用药物 45 天或更长时间的人戒烟成功率更高(p):虽然在所有其他对照点中,使用伐尼克兰的戒烟率均高于使用安非他酮,但根据一年后最后 7 天的情况来看,使用伐尼克兰和安非他酮的戒烟成功率没有明显差异。使用药物 45 天或更长时间者戒烟成功率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications
Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The journal provides a forum for the exchange of ideas and experiences which contribute to the improvement of mathematics teaching and learning for students from upper secondary/high school level through to university first degree level. A distinctive feature of the journal is its emphasis on the applications of mathematics and mathematical modelling within the context of mathematics education world-wide. The journal"s readership consists of mathematics teachers, students, researchers and those concerned with curriculum development and assessment, indeed anyone concerned about the education of users of mathematics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信