Comparison of cultured mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow or peripheral blood of rats

A. Kamal, D. Iskandriati, I. H. Dilogo, N. Siregar, E. Hutagalung, A. Yusuf, S. Mariya, Kurniadi Husodo
{"title":"Comparison of cultured mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow or peripheral blood of rats","authors":"A. Kamal, D. Iskandriati, I. H. Dilogo, N. Siregar, E. Hutagalung, A. Yusuf, S. Mariya, Kurniadi Husodo","doi":"10.5455/JEIM.180913.OR.091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are primarily isolated from bone marrow. Peripheral blood is also reported as an alternative source of MSC. This study compared MSC which were isolated and cultured from bone marrow and those from peripheral blood of rats. Methods: MSC from bone marrow and peripheral blood were harvested from 5 male Sprague Dawley rats. After isolation, the cells were grown on tissue culture plates with concentration of 107 cells per well. Observations were conducted to evaluate the attachment of nucleated cells with fibroblast-like morphology. Characterization of MSC was done using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunocytochemistry assay. Results: The mean number of nucleated cells isolated from the bone marrow on day 0 was higher than those isolated from the peripheral blood. Bone marrow MSC with typical fibroblast-like morphology proliferated rapidly and reached 80% confluency on day 14. Subcultures were able to be conducted on day 15 (first passage) and day 28 (second passage). On days 15 and 28, no nucleated cells remained in peripheral blood cultures. Conclusions: Bone marrow derived MSC are more enriched and grow more efficiently than those derived from peripheral blood.","PeriodicalId":16091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental and Integrative Medicine","volume":"110 3 1","pages":"17-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental and Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JEIM.180913.OR.091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objectives: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are primarily isolated from bone marrow. Peripheral blood is also reported as an alternative source of MSC. This study compared MSC which were isolated and cultured from bone marrow and those from peripheral blood of rats. Methods: MSC from bone marrow and peripheral blood were harvested from 5 male Sprague Dawley rats. After isolation, the cells were grown on tissue culture plates with concentration of 107 cells per well. Observations were conducted to evaluate the attachment of nucleated cells with fibroblast-like morphology. Characterization of MSC was done using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunocytochemistry assay. Results: The mean number of nucleated cells isolated from the bone marrow on day 0 was higher than those isolated from the peripheral blood. Bone marrow MSC with typical fibroblast-like morphology proliferated rapidly and reached 80% confluency on day 14. Subcultures were able to be conducted on day 15 (first passage) and day 28 (second passage). On days 15 and 28, no nucleated cells remained in peripheral blood cultures. Conclusions: Bone marrow derived MSC are more enriched and grow more efficiently than those derived from peripheral blood.
大鼠骨髓与外周血间充质干细胞的培养比较
目的:间充质干细胞(MSC)主要从骨髓中分离。外周血也被认为是骨髓间充质干细胞的另一种来源。本研究比较了从大鼠骨髓中分离培养的间充质干细胞和从大鼠外周血中分离培养的间充质干细胞。方法:取5只雄性sd大鼠骨髓和外周血的MSC。细胞分离后,以每孔107个细胞的浓度在组织培养板上生长。观察成纤维细胞样形态有核细胞的附着情况。利用逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)和免疫细胞化学方法对MSC进行表征。结果:第0天从骨髓中分离的有核细胞的平均数量高于外周血中分离的有核细胞的平均数量。具有典型成纤维细胞样形态的骨髓间充质干细胞迅速增殖,在第14天达到80%的融合度。传代培养可以在第15天(第一次传代)和第28天(第二次传代)进行。第15天和第28天,外周血培养中没有有核细胞。结论:骨髓来源的间充质干细胞比外周血来源的间充质干细胞更丰富,生长效率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信