Differentiation between Pleural Mesothelioma versus Pseudo-Mesothelioma Demonstrated in Eight Autopsy Cases

J. Fries, M. Saleh, R. Büttner
{"title":"Differentiation between Pleural Mesothelioma versus Pseudo-Mesothelioma Demonstrated in Eight Autopsy Cases","authors":"J. Fries, M. Saleh, R. Büttner","doi":"10.31487/j.cor.2021.08.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pleural lobes are the origin of different pathologies, including malignant tumors, e.g., pleural \nmesothelioma. In some cases, clinical and macroscopic presentation point strongly to the diagnosis but often \nenough the patient has another underlying disease; malignant neoplasms of the lung as well as other organs \n(skin, pancreas, prostate or kidney) can mimic pleural mesothelioma and if so, are defined as ‘pseudo-mesothelioma’. We present eight cases that are clinically and macroscopically highly suspicious for pleural \nmesothelioma. All patients were autopsied due to medico-legal issues and work-related diseases. Six out of \neight patients underwent autopsy to exclude possibility of asbestos-related malignancy and two out of eight \ndue to exclusion of silicosis. From the eight cases, only three were real pleural mesotheliomas. Another \nthree were adenocarcinomas of the lung mimicking pleural mesotheliomas. One had squamous cell \ncarcinoma of the lung. Lastly, one patient had an extraordinary case of papillary renal cell carcinoma \nmetastasizing universally in both pleura lobes. Due to striking morphological similarities, the exact final \ndiagnosis was only possible after extended immunohistochemical analysis of the tissues. In summary, not \nonly is it difficult to distinguish between real or pseudo pleural mesothelioma in patients having had contact \nwith asbestos. Even patients with no evidence of asbestos contact can have clinical and pathological events \nstrongly suggesting asbestosis and mesothelioma, without having it.","PeriodicalId":10487,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oncology and Research","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oncology and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.cor.2021.08.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pleural lobes are the origin of different pathologies, including malignant tumors, e.g., pleural mesothelioma. In some cases, clinical and macroscopic presentation point strongly to the diagnosis but often enough the patient has another underlying disease; malignant neoplasms of the lung as well as other organs (skin, pancreas, prostate or kidney) can mimic pleural mesothelioma and if so, are defined as ‘pseudo-mesothelioma’. We present eight cases that are clinically and macroscopically highly suspicious for pleural mesothelioma. All patients were autopsied due to medico-legal issues and work-related diseases. Six out of eight patients underwent autopsy to exclude possibility of asbestos-related malignancy and two out of eight due to exclusion of silicosis. From the eight cases, only three were real pleural mesotheliomas. Another three were adenocarcinomas of the lung mimicking pleural mesotheliomas. One had squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Lastly, one patient had an extraordinary case of papillary renal cell carcinoma metastasizing universally in both pleura lobes. Due to striking morphological similarities, the exact final diagnosis was only possible after extended immunohistochemical analysis of the tissues. In summary, not only is it difficult to distinguish between real or pseudo pleural mesothelioma in patients having had contact with asbestos. Even patients with no evidence of asbestos contact can have clinical and pathological events strongly suggesting asbestosis and mesothelioma, without having it.
胸膜间皮瘤与假性间皮瘤的8例尸检鉴别分析
胸膜叶是不同病理的起源,包括恶性肿瘤,如胸膜间皮瘤。在某些情况下,临床和宏观表现强烈地指向诊断,但往往足够的病人有其他潜在疾病;肺以及其他器官(皮肤、胰腺、前列腺或肾脏)的恶性肿瘤可与胸膜间皮瘤相似,如果是这样,则定义为“假性间皮瘤”。我们报告了8例临床和宏观高度怀疑胸膜间皮瘤的病例。所有患者均因法医学问题和与工作有关的疾病进行了尸检。8名患者中有6人进行了尸检,以排除石棉相关恶性肿瘤的可能性,8名患者中有2人因排除矽肺病而进行了尸检。在这8例病例中,只有3例是真正的胸膜间皮瘤。另外3例是类似胸膜间皮瘤的肺腺癌。其中一人患有肺鳞状细胞癌。最后,一位病人有一个特殊的病例乳头状肾细胞癌转移普遍在两个胸膜叶。由于惊人的形态相似性,只有在对组织进行广泛的免疫组织化学分析后才有可能做出确切的最终诊断。总之,不仅是很难区分真实或假性胸膜间皮瘤的病人有接触石棉。即使没有石棉接触证据的患者也可能出现临床和病理事件,强烈表明石棉沉滞和间皮瘤,而没有石棉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信