Development and Preliminary Validation of a Stroke Physical Activity Questionnaire

IF 1.8 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Thunyakamon Phusuttatam, Jittima Saengsuwan, P. Kittipanya-ngam
{"title":"Development and Preliminary Validation of a Stroke Physical Activity Questionnaire","authors":"Thunyakamon Phusuttatam, Jittima Saengsuwan, P. Kittipanya-ngam","doi":"10.1155/2019/6764834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective The aim of the current study was to develop and then to determine preliminary validity of a physical activity questionnaire specifically designed for ambulatory, chronic stroke patients. Methods This cross-sectional study recruited 92 chronic stroke patients. In Phase I, the SPAQ was developed and its content validity index (CVI) determined. In Phase II, we examined (1) the concurrent validity of SPAQ vs. the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF); (2) the convergent validity of SPAQ vs. the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC), vs. the six-minute walk test (6-MWT), vs. the timed up and go test (TUGT), vs. the Motricity Index, vs. the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and vs. the Modified Rankin Scale (MRS); and (3) the discriminant validity of the SPAQ vs. the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The concurrent validity and convergent and divergent validity were analysed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. The agreement between the SPAQ and IPAQ-SF was assessed using the Kappa statistic. Results The SPAQ has 12 items in 3 main components which covers low (7 items), moderate (3 items), and vigorous (2 items) physical activity. The SPAQ had a CVI of 0.93. Spearman's correlation coefficient (rs) for SPAQ vs. IPAQ-SF was 0.53 (p < 0.001). The SPAQ yielded substantial agreement with the IPAQ-SF (Kappa = 0.65). For convergent validity, the SPAQ had a moderate correlation with the 6-MWT, MI, NIHSS, FAC, TUGT, and MRS (p < 0.05). For discriminant validity, the SPAQ was not correlated with the MoCA (rs = 0.061, p = 0.68). Conclusion The SPAQ can be used to practically assess physical activity in chronic stroke patients, and it has acceptable psychometric properties which are comparable to other standard physical activity questionnaires. Future work should determine the validity of the SPAQ using an objective device such as an accelerometer.","PeriodicalId":22054,"journal":{"name":"Stroke Research and Treatment","volume":"274 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6764834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objective The aim of the current study was to develop and then to determine preliminary validity of a physical activity questionnaire specifically designed for ambulatory, chronic stroke patients. Methods This cross-sectional study recruited 92 chronic stroke patients. In Phase I, the SPAQ was developed and its content validity index (CVI) determined. In Phase II, we examined (1) the concurrent validity of SPAQ vs. the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF); (2) the convergent validity of SPAQ vs. the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC), vs. the six-minute walk test (6-MWT), vs. the timed up and go test (TUGT), vs. the Motricity Index, vs. the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and vs. the Modified Rankin Scale (MRS); and (3) the discriminant validity of the SPAQ vs. the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The concurrent validity and convergent and divergent validity were analysed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. The agreement between the SPAQ and IPAQ-SF was assessed using the Kappa statistic. Results The SPAQ has 12 items in 3 main components which covers low (7 items), moderate (3 items), and vigorous (2 items) physical activity. The SPAQ had a CVI of 0.93. Spearman's correlation coefficient (rs) for SPAQ vs. IPAQ-SF was 0.53 (p < 0.001). The SPAQ yielded substantial agreement with the IPAQ-SF (Kappa = 0.65). For convergent validity, the SPAQ had a moderate correlation with the 6-MWT, MI, NIHSS, FAC, TUGT, and MRS (p < 0.05). For discriminant validity, the SPAQ was not correlated with the MoCA (rs = 0.061, p = 0.68). Conclusion The SPAQ can be used to practically assess physical activity in chronic stroke patients, and it has acceptable psychometric properties which are comparable to other standard physical activity questionnaires. Future work should determine the validity of the SPAQ using an objective device such as an accelerometer.
卒中身体活动问卷的编制与初步验证
目的:本研究的目的是开发一种专门为非卧床的慢性脑卒中患者设计的身体活动问卷,然后确定初步的有效性。方法对92例慢性脑卒中患者进行横断面研究。在第一阶段,编制了SPAQ并确定了内容效度指数(CVI)。在第二阶段,我们检验了(1)SPAQ与国际体育活动问卷-简表(IPAQ-SF)的并发效度;(2) SPAQ与功能活动类别(FAC)、6分钟步行测验(6-MWT)、起身步行计时测验(TUGT)、运动力指数、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)、修正Rankin量表(MRS)的收敛效度;(3) SPAQ与蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)的区别效度。采用Spearman等级相关系数分析并发效度、收敛效度和发散效度。采用Kappa统计量评价SPAQ与IPAQ-SF之间的一致性。结果spq分为低体力活动(7项)、中度体力活动(3项)和剧烈体力活动(2项)3个主要成分,共12项。SPAQ的CVI为0.93。SPAQ与IPAQ-SF的Spearman相关系数(rs)为0.53 (p < 0.001)。SPAQ结果与IPAQ-SF基本一致(Kappa = 0.65)。对于收敛效度,SPAQ与6-MWT、MI、NIHSS、FAC、TUGT和MRS有中度相关性(p < 0.05)。在判别效度上,SPAQ与MoCA不相关(rs = 0.061, p = 0.68)。结论SPAQ可用于慢性脑卒中患者的身体活动评估,具有与其他标准身体活动问卷相当的心理测量特性。未来的工作应该使用诸如加速度计之类的客观设备来确定SPAQ的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stroke Research and Treatment
Stroke Research and Treatment PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信