Tubogram, A Useful Investigation for Evaluation of Patients Post Cholecystostomy Drain for Acute Cholecystitis, Single Centre Experience

Badreldin Mohamed, George Simmons, Khalid M. Bhatti, S. Taha, Abdalla Hassan, Muhammad Chauhan, S. Babikir, M. Mohamed, D. Mirghani, R. Canelo
{"title":"Tubogram, A Useful Investigation for Evaluation of Patients Post Cholecystostomy Drain for Acute Cholecystitis, Single Centre Experience","authors":"Badreldin Mohamed, George Simmons, Khalid M. Bhatti, S. Taha, Abdalla Hassan, Muhammad Chauhan, S. Babikir, M. Mohamed, D. Mirghani, R. Canelo","doi":"10.59657/2837-8172.brs.23.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard treatment for cholecystitis. However, for co-morbid or unstable patients, a less invasive approach can be adopted such as cholecystostomy drain (CD) insertion. CD can be a bridging operation or can be used as a definitive treatment if patient unsuitable for surgery. Methods: Retrospective study of patients who had Tubogram at Cumberland Infirmary, post CD for non-malignant cause between January 2019 and January 2022, comparing their outcome with the patients who did not undergo tubogram investigation. Patient data list collected from information department, Cumberland Infirmary. Results: Cholecystostomy drain placed for 58 patients; 21 patient (36.21%) had tubogram. Of the 58,44 patients (75.86%) had one CD; only 10 patients (22.73%) of them had tubogram. 14 patients had more than one CD (11 patient of them had tubogram). 66.67% patients had tubogram at 3-4 weeks following CD insertion. Outcome of tubogram patients was 47.62% (n=10) had Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) 6 weeks after cholecystostomy drain removal and 28.57% (n=6) had Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography then Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Non-tubogram patients’ group had more visits to same day emergency clinic comparing to tubogram patients’ group. Conclusion: Tubogram is a useful, cheap, non-invasive test linked with lower recurrence rate of cholecystitis symptoms after removal of CD; it is also associated with earlier CD removal. We recommend that tubogram should be a routine investigation for all patients three to four weeks post CD insertion.","PeriodicalId":13694,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports","volume":"147 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59657/2837-8172.brs.23.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard treatment for cholecystitis. However, for co-morbid or unstable patients, a less invasive approach can be adopted such as cholecystostomy drain (CD) insertion. CD can be a bridging operation or can be used as a definitive treatment if patient unsuitable for surgery. Methods: Retrospective study of patients who had Tubogram at Cumberland Infirmary, post CD for non-malignant cause between January 2019 and January 2022, comparing their outcome with the patients who did not undergo tubogram investigation. Patient data list collected from information department, Cumberland Infirmary. Results: Cholecystostomy drain placed for 58 patients; 21 patient (36.21%) had tubogram. Of the 58,44 patients (75.86%) had one CD; only 10 patients (22.73%) of them had tubogram. 14 patients had more than one CD (11 patient of them had tubogram). 66.67% patients had tubogram at 3-4 weeks following CD insertion. Outcome of tubogram patients was 47.62% (n=10) had Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) 6 weeks after cholecystostomy drain removal and 28.57% (n=6) had Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography then Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Non-tubogram patients’ group had more visits to same day emergency clinic comparing to tubogram patients’ group. Conclusion: Tubogram is a useful, cheap, non-invasive test linked with lower recurrence rate of cholecystitis symptoms after removal of CD; it is also associated with earlier CD removal. We recommend that tubogram should be a routine investigation for all patients three to four weeks post CD insertion.
输卵管造影,评价急性胆囊炎胆囊造瘘术后引流的有用调查,单中心经验
背景:腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)是治疗胆囊炎的金标准。然而,对于合并症或不稳定的患者,可以采用侵入性较小的方法,如胆囊造口引流管(CD)插入。CD可以作为一种桥接手术,如果患者不适合手术,也可以作为一种明确的治疗方法。方法:回顾性研究2019年1月至2022年1月在坎伯兰医院(Cumberland hospital)接受非恶性原因CD后输卵管造影检查的患者,将其结果与未接受输卵管造影检查的患者进行比较。从坎伯兰医院信息部收集的患者数据列表。结果:胆囊造口引流58例;输卵管造影21例(36.21%)。58例患者中,44例(75.86%)有1例CD;其中仅有10例(22.73%)行输卵管造影。14例有1个以上CD(其中11例有输卵管造影)。66.67%的患者在CD插入后3-4周行输卵管造影。输卵管造影患者中,47.62% (n=10)在胆囊造瘘6周后行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC), 28.57% (n=6)行内镜逆行胆管造影后行腹腔镜胆囊切除术。非输卵管造影组当日急诊就诊次数高于输卵管造影组。结论:输卵管造影是一种实用、廉价、无创的检查方法,胆囊切除术后胆囊炎症状复发率较低;它也与早期的乳糜泻清除有关。我们建议所有患者在CD插入后3 - 4周进行输卵管造影检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信