India’s Science, Technology and Innovation Policy: Choices for Course Correction with Lessons Learned from China

G. Sandhya
{"title":"India’s Science, Technology and Innovation Policy: Choices for Course Correction with Lessons Learned from China","authors":"G. Sandhya","doi":"10.14203/STIPM.2018.131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A large number of developed and emerging economies have introduced S&T reforms and some of them such as Japan, South Korea and later China have used them for gaining competitive advantage in science, technology and innovation through well crafted S&T policies and appropriate strategies. So far, India has pronounced four major S&T policies beginning with the Science Policy Resolution (SPR) in 1958, Technology Policy in 1983; S&T Policy in 2003 and Science Technology and Innovation Policy in 2013. In a period of six decades India has created a huge S&T infrastructure and made impressive achievements in space, defence and atomic energy, yet the feat is not as impressive in the industrial sector. In innovation competitiveness, R&D and human resource, the indices related to global manufacturing, competition, innovation and knowledge, India has not performed as well in comparison to other BRICS countries. In this paper an attempt has been made to look at, how comprehensive India’s STI policies with regard to policy components; a roadmap; strategies for execution and boldness in terms of identifying and recognising the failures and recommend major structural changes. What is intended is to understand the relationship between the domain of S&T policy and intended outcomes; the mismatch between the policy expectations and outcomes. An attempt is being made to identify possibility for correction  by taking lessons from other economies, such as China. Keywords:   S&T policies, Innovation policies, Innovation ecosystem","PeriodicalId":31881,"journal":{"name":"STIPM STI Policy and Management Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STIPM STI Policy and Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14203/STIPM.2018.131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

A large number of developed and emerging economies have introduced S&T reforms and some of them such as Japan, South Korea and later China have used them for gaining competitive advantage in science, technology and innovation through well crafted S&T policies and appropriate strategies. So far, India has pronounced four major S&T policies beginning with the Science Policy Resolution (SPR) in 1958, Technology Policy in 1983; S&T Policy in 2003 and Science Technology and Innovation Policy in 2013. In a period of six decades India has created a huge S&T infrastructure and made impressive achievements in space, defence and atomic energy, yet the feat is not as impressive in the industrial sector. In innovation competitiveness, R&D and human resource, the indices related to global manufacturing, competition, innovation and knowledge, India has not performed as well in comparison to other BRICS countries. In this paper an attempt has been made to look at, how comprehensive India’s STI policies with regard to policy components; a roadmap; strategies for execution and boldness in terms of identifying and recognising the failures and recommend major structural changes. What is intended is to understand the relationship between the domain of S&T policy and intended outcomes; the mismatch between the policy expectations and outcomes. An attempt is being made to identify possibility for correction  by taking lessons from other economies, such as China. Keywords:   S&T policies, Innovation policies, Innovation ecosystem
印度的科技创新政策:从中国吸取教训的路径修正选择
许多发达国家和新兴经济体都进行了科技改革,其中一些国家,如日本、韩国和后来的中国,通过精心制定的科技政策和适当的战略,利用这些改革在科技和创新方面获得了竞争优势。到目前为止,印度已经宣布了四项主要的科技政策:1958年的科学政策决议(SPR), 1983年的技术政策;2003年的科技政策和2013年的科技创新政策。在60年的时间里,印度建立了庞大的科技基础设施,在太空、国防和原子能领域取得了令人印象深刻的成就,但在工业领域的成就却不那么令人印象深刻。在创新竞争力、研发和人力资源、与全球制造业、竞争、创新和知识相关的指数方面,与其他金砖国家相比,印度的表现并不好。本文试图考察印度的科技创新政策在政策组成部分方面有多全面;一个路线图;在识别和识别失败方面的执行策略和胆识,并建议主要的结构变化。其目的是理解科技政策领域与预期结果之间的关系;政策预期与结果之间的不匹配。人们正试图通过借鉴中国等其他经济体的经验,找出修正的可能性。关键词:科技政策,创新政策,创新生态系统
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信