Bank Ownership and Non-Performing Loans of Islamic and Conventional Banks in An Emerging Economy

Andrew Tek WEI SAW, AI YEE OOI, Woon Kan Yap, Z. Patrick, S. Salam
{"title":"Bank Ownership and Non-Performing Loans of Islamic and Conventional Banks in An Emerging Economy","authors":"Andrew Tek WEI SAW, AI YEE OOI, Woon Kan Yap, Z. Patrick, S. Salam","doi":"10.47836/ijeam.16.3.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study assesses the non-performing loans of conventional and Islamic banks as well as the influence of ownership on the non-performing loans of conventional and Islamic\nbanks. Due to fundamental differences in Islamic and conventional bank such as funding, non-performing loans might have differing effects on Islamic and conventional banks. This study utilised data of 26 conventional banks and 16 Islamic banks from Malaysia from 2012 to 2020. A Random Effect model was used to investigate the difference between conventional and Islamic banks’ non-performing loans as well as the influence of ownership on non-performing loans of conventional and Islamic banks. Results showed no significant differences for non-performing loans of conventional and Islamic banks. This result implies that despite the fact that Islamic banks may benefit from lower agency costs, this does not considerably decrease the likelihood of non-performing loans. Foreign Islamic banks shows higher non-performing loans in comparison to domestic Islamic banks. However, there were no significant differences for non-performing loans between foreign conventional and domestic conventional banks. This study suggests that Islamic bankers, particularly those intending to expand into other countries, investigate nonperforming loans, which can impact the risk of a foreign Islamic bank.","PeriodicalId":40031,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Economics and Management","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47836/ijeam.16.3.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assesses the non-performing loans of conventional and Islamic banks as well as the influence of ownership on the non-performing loans of conventional and Islamic banks. Due to fundamental differences in Islamic and conventional bank such as funding, non-performing loans might have differing effects on Islamic and conventional banks. This study utilised data of 26 conventional banks and 16 Islamic banks from Malaysia from 2012 to 2020. A Random Effect model was used to investigate the difference between conventional and Islamic banks’ non-performing loans as well as the influence of ownership on non-performing loans of conventional and Islamic banks. Results showed no significant differences for non-performing loans of conventional and Islamic banks. This result implies that despite the fact that Islamic banks may benefit from lower agency costs, this does not considerably decrease the likelihood of non-performing loans. Foreign Islamic banks shows higher non-performing loans in comparison to domestic Islamic banks. However, there were no significant differences for non-performing loans between foreign conventional and domestic conventional banks. This study suggests that Islamic bankers, particularly those intending to expand into other countries, investigate nonperforming loans, which can impact the risk of a foreign Islamic bank.
新兴经济体中伊斯兰银行和传统银行的银行所有权和不良贷款
本研究评估了传统银行和伊斯兰银行的不良贷款,以及所有权对传统银行和伊斯兰银行不良贷款的影响。由于伊斯兰银行和传统银行在资金等方面的根本差异,不良贷款可能对伊斯兰银行和传统银行产生不同的影响。这项研究利用了马来西亚从2012年到2020年的26家传统银行和16家伊斯兰银行的数据。采用随机效应模型研究了传统银行和伊斯兰银行不良贷款的差异,以及所有权对传统银行和伊斯兰银行不良贷款的影响。结果显示,传统银行和伊斯兰银行的不良贷款没有显著差异。这一结果表明,尽管伊斯兰银行可能从较低的代理成本中受益,但这并没有大大减少不良贷款的可能性。外国伊斯兰银行的不良贷款比国内伊斯兰银行高。然而,国外常规银行和国内常规银行的不良贷款没有显著差异。这项研究表明,伊斯兰银行家,特别是那些打算向其他国家扩张的银行家,调查不良贷款,这可能会影响外国伊斯兰银行的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Economics and Management
International Journal of Economics and Management Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal focuses on economics and management issues. The main subjects for economics cover national macroeconomic issues, international economic issues, interactions of national and regional economies, microeconomics and macroeconomics policies. The journal also considers thought-leading substantive research in the finance discipline. The main subjects for management include management decisions, Small Medium Enterprises (SME) practices, corporate social policies, digital marketing strategies and strategic management. The journal emphasises empirical studies with practical applications; examinations of theoretical and methodological developments. The journal is committed to publishing the high quality articles from economics and management perspectives. It is a triannual journal published in April, August and December and all articles submitted are in English. IJEM follows a double-blind peer-review process, whereby authors do not know reviewers and vice versa. Peer review is fundamental to the scientific publication process and the dissemination of sound science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信