Attachment, stress and interactional justice

IF 3.3 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
David A. Richards, Lumina S. Albert, A. Schat
{"title":"Attachment, stress and interactional justice","authors":"David A. Richards, Lumina S. Albert, A. Schat","doi":"10.1108/pr-08-2022-0537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper aims to examine how individuals' attachment dispositions relate to interactional justice perceptions, how work stressors moderate this association, and how together they associate with attitudes (satisfaction, turnover intention, commitment) and citizenship behaviors at work.Design/methodology/approachSurvey data were used in an observed variable path analysis examining mediation by interactional justice and moderation by stressors on the associations between attachment dimensions and work outcomes.FindingsAttachment avoidance was negatively related to interactional justice perceptions and attachment anxiety was also negatively related to interactional justice perceptions, but only under conditions of higher work stressors. Interactional justice mediated the associations between attachment avoidance and work outcomes, and between the interaction of attachment anxiety and work stressors on work outcomes.Practical implicationsThese findings are particularly relevant to multiple aspects of HR practice, including performance feedback, managing stressors, building resilience, reward allocation and recognition, designing wellness programs and other aspects of human resource management.Originality/valueThis research goes beyond contextual predictors of justice perceptions and demonstrates that jointly considering attachment dimensions and work stressors uniquely contributes to understanding the formation of justice perceptions and their combined influence on work attitudes and behavior.","PeriodicalId":48148,"journal":{"name":"Personnel Review","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personnel Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-08-2022-0537","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to examine how individuals' attachment dispositions relate to interactional justice perceptions, how work stressors moderate this association, and how together they associate with attitudes (satisfaction, turnover intention, commitment) and citizenship behaviors at work.Design/methodology/approachSurvey data were used in an observed variable path analysis examining mediation by interactional justice and moderation by stressors on the associations between attachment dimensions and work outcomes.FindingsAttachment avoidance was negatively related to interactional justice perceptions and attachment anxiety was also negatively related to interactional justice perceptions, but only under conditions of higher work stressors. Interactional justice mediated the associations between attachment avoidance and work outcomes, and between the interaction of attachment anxiety and work stressors on work outcomes.Practical implicationsThese findings are particularly relevant to multiple aspects of HR practice, including performance feedback, managing stressors, building resilience, reward allocation and recognition, designing wellness programs and other aspects of human resource management.Originality/valueThis research goes beyond contextual predictors of justice perceptions and demonstrates that jointly considering attachment dimensions and work stressors uniquely contributes to understanding the formation of justice perceptions and their combined influence on work attitudes and behavior.
依恋,压力和互动公正
目的本研究旨在探讨个体依恋倾向与互动公正感知的关系,工作压力源如何调节这种关系,以及它们如何共同与工作态度(满意度、离职倾向、承诺)和公民行为相关。设计/方法/方法将调查数据用于观察变量路径分析,以检验互动公正和压力源对依恋维度与工作成果之间关系的调节作用。发现依恋回避与互动公正感知呈负相关,依恋焦虑与互动公正感知呈负相关,但仅在高工作压力条件下存在。依恋回避对工作结果的影响,以及依恋焦虑与工作压力源对工作结果的影响,在相互作用公平中起中介作用。这些发现与人力资源实践的多个方面特别相关,包括绩效反馈、管理压力源、建立弹性、奖励分配和认可、设计健康计划和人力资源管理的其他方面。原创性/价值本研究超越了公正感知的情境预测因素,并表明将依恋维度和工作压力因素联合考虑,有助于理解公正感知的形成及其对工作态度和行为的综合影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Personnel Review
Personnel Review Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Personnel Review (PR) publishes rigorous, well written articles from a range of theoretical and methodological traditions. We value articles that have high originality and that engage with contemporary challenges to human resource management theory, policy and practice development. Research that highlights innovation and emerging issues in the field, and the medium- to long-term impact of HRM policy and practice, is especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信