Theory Without Measurement or Some Finishing Touches on The Creative Portrait of Douglass North

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS
A. Maltsev, N. Rozinskaya
{"title":"Theory Without Measurement or Some Finishing Touches on The Creative Portrait of Douglass North","authors":"A. Maltsev, N. Rozinskaya","doi":"10.17835/2076-6297.2021.13.4.071-090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines some of the key features of the scientific work of Douglass North. It is argued that the popular image of North as an adherent of this or that school of economic thought is not highly relevant. The authors believe that one of the key features of North's research style is his \"theory-centricity\". The article demonstrates that the most important milestones in North's career (fling with Marxism in his youth, participation in the Сliometrics revolution, the transition from neoclassical economist to one of the founders of neo-institutionalism, a turn towards cognitive science), despite the seeming lack of continuity served as kind of steps of the ladder along which North went to the creation of a comprehensive theory of social development. Based on the results of qualitative content analysis of North's works of the 1950s and 60s, the authors show that even in the years of his affinity for quantitative economic history, the economist always put the ability to theorize above the skills of quantitative analysis. This feature, combined with the recent empirical turn in economics, which raised the prestige of empirical work to unprecedented heights, made it difficult for modern mainstream economists to perceive the ideas of the \"late\" North. The authors' analysis of the citation structure of North's last major book, \"Violence and Social Orders. Conceptual framework for the interpretation of the written history of mankind\" confirms this trend. This book generates greater interest among heterodox economists, historians, and political scientists than among representatives of mainstream economics. In the article's conclusion, the authors speculate about the prospects of the Northian theory-driven style of doing economic research in the face of the progressive \"empirization\" of modern economics.","PeriodicalId":43842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Institutional Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Institutional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2021.13.4.071-090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article examines some of the key features of the scientific work of Douglass North. It is argued that the popular image of North as an adherent of this or that school of economic thought is not highly relevant. The authors believe that one of the key features of North's research style is his "theory-centricity". The article demonstrates that the most important milestones in North's career (fling with Marxism in his youth, participation in the Сliometrics revolution, the transition from neoclassical economist to one of the founders of neo-institutionalism, a turn towards cognitive science), despite the seeming lack of continuity served as kind of steps of the ladder along which North went to the creation of a comprehensive theory of social development. Based on the results of qualitative content analysis of North's works of the 1950s and 60s, the authors show that even in the years of his affinity for quantitative economic history, the economist always put the ability to theorize above the skills of quantitative analysis. This feature, combined with the recent empirical turn in economics, which raised the prestige of empirical work to unprecedented heights, made it difficult for modern mainstream economists to perceive the ideas of the "late" North. The authors' analysis of the citation structure of North's last major book, "Violence and Social Orders. Conceptual framework for the interpretation of the written history of mankind" confirms this trend. This book generates greater interest among heterodox economists, historians, and political scientists than among representatives of mainstream economics. In the article's conclusion, the authors speculate about the prospects of the Northian theory-driven style of doing economic research in the face of the progressive "empirization" of modern economics.
没有测量的理论或道格拉斯·诺斯创作肖像的一些润色
本文考察了道格拉斯·诺斯科学工作的一些关键特征。有人认为,诺斯作为这个或那个经济思想学派的追随者的流行形象并不高度相关。作者认为,诺斯的研究风格的一个关键特征是他的“理论中心”。这篇文章表明,诺斯职业生涯中最重要的里程碑(年轻时接触马克思主义,参与Сliometrics革命,从新古典经济学家转变为新制度主义的创始人之一,转向认知科学),尽管看起来缺乏连续性,但它们是诺斯走向社会发展综合理论创造的阶梯上的台阶。根据对诺斯20世纪50年代和60年代著作的定性内容分析结果,作者表明,即使在他对定量经济史感兴趣的那些年里,这位经济学家也总是把理论化的能力置于定量分析的技能之上。这一特点,再加上最近经济学的实证转向,将实证工作的声望提升到前所未有的高度,使得现代主流经济学家很难理解“晚期”北方的思想。作者分析了诺斯最后一部重要著作《暴力与社会秩序》的引文结构。“解释人类书面历史的概念框架”证实了这一趋势。这本书引起了非正统经济学家、历史学家和政治学家比主流经济学代表更大的兴趣。在文章的结语中,作者对北欧理论驱动的经济研究风格在现代经济学不断“帝国化”的背景下的前景进行了推测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
24
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信