Reprint from NJ 1: 1. Editorial and Insert – The Terrigal Conference

IF 1
{"title":"Reprint from NJ 1: 1. Editorial and Insert – The Terrigal Conference","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/14452294.2016.1279463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following material comprises the original editorial from the very first NADIE Journal plus an insert from in the centre pages. It has been re-typed for inclusion in this edition but the original spelling and style has not been modified or edited. This reprint is an important record (literally) of the discussions that took place during the first drama education conference held in Australia, at Terrigal, NSW, in December, 1975. It seems entirely appropriate that we partner these discussions with the key issues talked about by each of our State and Territory presidents in 2016, more than 40 years later. Some of the issues raised in discussion in 1975, seem irrelevant today with drama now so solidly established as part of the curriculum landscape in Australia. It is worth considering how much has changed (including the use of ‘kids’ to indicate children or students – something we would not get away with in a publication today) but there is a good deal of material here, which warrants deep and ongoing reflection. One of the things that struck me was how important it was for our earlier drama educators to grapple with the nature of drama in an educational context, what might constitute a drama curriculum, what pedagogies are effective, how we assess and report so that the learning in drama is identifiable. In contrast, our current issues seem to be largely those of infrastructure and, to a degree, advocacy. I leave these pages wondering how much better we can become at being certain we understand what learning in drama is and can be, and how much better we can become at communicating that to non-drama educators and community members.","PeriodicalId":41180,"journal":{"name":"NJ-Drama Australia Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NJ-Drama Australia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14452294.2016.1279463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The following material comprises the original editorial from the very first NADIE Journal plus an insert from in the centre pages. It has been re-typed for inclusion in this edition but the original spelling and style has not been modified or edited. This reprint is an important record (literally) of the discussions that took place during the first drama education conference held in Australia, at Terrigal, NSW, in December, 1975. It seems entirely appropriate that we partner these discussions with the key issues talked about by each of our State and Territory presidents in 2016, more than 40 years later. Some of the issues raised in discussion in 1975, seem irrelevant today with drama now so solidly established as part of the curriculum landscape in Australia. It is worth considering how much has changed (including the use of ‘kids’ to indicate children or students – something we would not get away with in a publication today) but there is a good deal of material here, which warrants deep and ongoing reflection. One of the things that struck me was how important it was for our earlier drama educators to grapple with the nature of drama in an educational context, what might constitute a drama curriculum, what pedagogies are effective, how we assess and report so that the learning in drama is identifiable. In contrast, our current issues seem to be largely those of infrastructure and, to a degree, advocacy. I leave these pages wondering how much better we can become at being certain we understand what learning in drama is and can be, and how much better we can become at communicating that to non-drama educators and community members.
转载自NJ 1:1。社论和插播-领土会议
以下材料包括来自第一期NADIE期刊的原始社论以及来自中心页的插入。它已被重新键入,包括在这个版本中,但原来的拼写和风格没有修改或编辑。这是1975年12月在澳大利亚新南威尔士州特里加尔举行的第一次戏剧教育会议上讨论的重要记录(字面上)。40多年后的2016年,我们将这些讨论与各州和各领地总统讨论的关键问题结合起来,这似乎是完全合适的。1975年讨论中提出的一些问题,在今天看来似乎无关紧要,因为戏剧现在已经成为澳大利亚课程格局的一部分。值得考虑的是有多少变化(包括使用“kids”来表示儿童或学生——这在今天的出版物中是无法逃脱的),但这里有大量的材料,值得深入和持续的反思。令我印象深刻的一件事是,对于我们早期的戏剧教育者来说,在教育背景下理解戏剧的本质是多么重要,什么可能构成戏剧课程,什么样的教学法是有效的,我们如何评估和报告,以便戏剧学习是可识别的。相比之下,我们目前的问题似乎主要是基础设施问题,以及在某种程度上的宣传问题。我想知道我们能在多大程度上更好地确定我们理解戏剧学习是什么和可以是什么,以及我们能在多大程度上更好地与非戏剧教育者和社区成员交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信