STUDY OF SINGLE- AND DOUBLE-MOMENT MICROPHYSICS SCHEME IMPACT ON LILI AND MANGGA TROPICAL CYCLONE

Fazrul Rafsanjani Sadarang
{"title":"STUDY OF SINGLE- AND DOUBLE-MOMENT MICROPHYSICS SCHEME IMPACT ON LILI AND MANGGA TROPICAL CYCLONE","authors":"Fazrul Rafsanjani Sadarang","doi":"10.31172/jmg.v23i3.804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, prediction of tropical cyclones using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model was used to test the double-moment (DM) and single-moment (SM) microphysical parameterization schemes in event of Lili and Mangga Tropical Cyclones. Models with microphysical parameterization schemes WDM5, WDM6, WSM5, WSM6, and without microphysical parameterization schemes (CTL) were each tested against track predictions, the pressure value, and maximum wind speed. The results of track prediction show that the best schemes in the tropical cyclone case of Lili and Mangga is WSM6 and WDM6, respectively, with an average error value of 78.1 and 80.1 km. Based on the Taylor diagram, the prediction results of the pressure value and the maximum wind speed in case of Lili Tropical Cyclones get the WDM6 scheme as the best scheme. Meanwhile, the results of the pressure prediction at the cyclone center in the case of Mangga Tropical Cyclones show that the WDM6 scheme is the best. However, the prediction of maximum wind speed in Mangga tropical cyclones produces the CTL scheme as the best scheme. This study shows that DM dan SM microphysical parameterization schemes have a big impact on track prediction compare to pressure value and maximum wind speed variable.","PeriodicalId":32347,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Meteorologi dan Geofisika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Meteorologi dan Geofisika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31172/jmg.v23i3.804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, prediction of tropical cyclones using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model was used to test the double-moment (DM) and single-moment (SM) microphysical parameterization schemes in event of Lili and Mangga Tropical Cyclones. Models with microphysical parameterization schemes WDM5, WDM6, WSM5, WSM6, and without microphysical parameterization schemes (CTL) were each tested against track predictions, the pressure value, and maximum wind speed. The results of track prediction show that the best schemes in the tropical cyclone case of Lili and Mangga is WSM6 and WDM6, respectively, with an average error value of 78.1 and 80.1 km. Based on the Taylor diagram, the prediction results of the pressure value and the maximum wind speed in case of Lili Tropical Cyclones get the WDM6 scheme as the best scheme. Meanwhile, the results of the pressure prediction at the cyclone center in the case of Mangga Tropical Cyclones show that the WDM6 scheme is the best. However, the prediction of maximum wind speed in Mangga tropical cyclones produces the CTL scheme as the best scheme. This study shows that DM dan SM microphysical parameterization schemes have a big impact on track prediction compare to pressure value and maximum wind speed variable.
单、双矩微物理方案对丽丽、芒迦热带气旋影响的研究
本文利用气象研究与预报(WRF)模式对Lili和Mangga热带气旋进行了双矩(DM)和单矩(SM)微物理参数化方案的试验。采用微物理参数化方案(WDM5、WDM6、WSM5、WSM6)和不采用微物理参数化方案(CTL)的模型分别对路径预测、压力值和最大风速进行了测试。路径预报结果表明,丽丽和芒尕的最佳方案分别为WSM6和WDM6,平均误差分别为78.1和80.1 km。根据泰勒图对丽丽热带气旋的气压值和最大风速的预测结果,得出WDM6方案为最佳方案。同时,对孟嘎热带气旋中心气压的预报结果表明,WDM6方案的预报效果最好。而对芒嘎热带气旋最大风速的预报结果显示CTL方案为最佳方案。研究表明,相对于压力值和最大风速变量,DM和SM微物理参数化方案对路径预测的影响较大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信