Efficacy of the Intrauterine Infusion of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients With Repeated Implantation Failure: A Randomized Control Trial

Pub Date : 2020-12-10 DOI:10.15296/ijwhr.2022.08
L. Safdarian, A. Aleyasin, M. Aghahoseini, Parvaneh Lak, Sedigheh Hoseini Mosa, F. Sarvi, A. Mahdavi, Aida Najafian, Parvin Falahi, S. Khazaei
{"title":"Efficacy of the Intrauterine Infusion of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients With Repeated Implantation Failure: A Randomized Control Trial","authors":"L. Safdarian, A. Aleyasin, M. Aghahoseini, Parvaneh Lak, Sedigheh Hoseini Mosa, F. Sarvi, A. Mahdavi, Aida Najafian, Parvin Falahi, S. Khazaei","doi":"10.15296/ijwhr.2022.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the intrauterine administration of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) before embryo transfer (ET) on pregnancy outcomes in women with repeated implantation failure (RIF). Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled trial included 120 RIF women who were candidates for frozen-thawed ET. In the PRP group (n=60), the intrauterine infusion of 0.5 mL PRP was performed 48 hours before ET, and the control group (n=60) underwent ET without intrauterine administration. Results: The implantation rate (28% vs. 11.9%, P<0.001), clinical pregnancy (51.6% vs. 26.6%, P=0.005), and live birth rate (58.3% vs. 28.3%, P=0.001) in PRP group were significantly higher compared to the control group. Based on the results, there was no significant difference with regard to miscarriage (12.5% vs. 12.9%, P=0.97) and multiple pregnancy rate (0.133% vs. 0.05%, P=0.11) between the two groups. Finally, preterm delivery was significantly higher in the PRP group (P<0.001). Conclusions: According to this study, the result revealed that PRP is effective in the improvement of pregnancy outcomes in RIF patients. Further studies are needed to identify the group of patients who would benefit from this intervention.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15296/ijwhr.2022.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the intrauterine administration of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) before embryo transfer (ET) on pregnancy outcomes in women with repeated implantation failure (RIF). Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled trial included 120 RIF women who were candidates for frozen-thawed ET. In the PRP group (n=60), the intrauterine infusion of 0.5 mL PRP was performed 48 hours before ET, and the control group (n=60) underwent ET without intrauterine administration. Results: The implantation rate (28% vs. 11.9%, P<0.001), clinical pregnancy (51.6% vs. 26.6%, P=0.005), and live birth rate (58.3% vs. 28.3%, P=0.001) in PRP group were significantly higher compared to the control group. Based on the results, there was no significant difference with regard to miscarriage (12.5% vs. 12.9%, P=0.97) and multiple pregnancy rate (0.133% vs. 0.05%, P=0.11) between the two groups. Finally, preterm delivery was significantly higher in the PRP group (P<0.001). Conclusions: According to this study, the result revealed that PRP is effective in the improvement of pregnancy outcomes in RIF patients. Further studies are needed to identify the group of patients who would benefit from this intervention.
分享
查看原文
子宫内输注富血小板血浆对反复着床失败患者妊娠结局的影响:一项随机对照试验
目的:本研究的目的是评估胚胎移植(ET)前宫内给予富血小板血浆(PRP)对反复着床失败(RIF)妇女妊娠结局的影响。材料与方法:本随机对照试验纳入120例冷冻解冻ET候选者的RIF妇女。PRP组(n=60)在ET前48小时宫内输注0.5 mL PRP,对照组(n=60)行ET,不宫内给药。结果:PRP组着床率(28% vs. 11.9%, P<0.001)、临床妊娠率(51.6% vs. 26.6%, P=0.005)、活产率(58.3% vs. 28.3%, P=0.001)显著高于对照组。结果显示,两组流产率(12.5%比12.9%,P=0.97)、多胎妊娠率(0.133%比0.05%,P=0.11)差异无统计学意义。最后,PRP组的早产率显著高于对照组(P<0.001)。结论:本研究结果显示PRP可有效改善RIF患者妊娠结局。需要进一步的研究来确定从这种干预中受益的患者群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信