Right people, right time? a qualitative study of service access experiences of adults with acquired brain injury following discharge from inpatient rehabilitation

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
M. Foster, M. Legg, Eloise Hummell, L. Burridge, Kirstyn Laurie
{"title":"Right people, right time? a qualitative study of service access experiences of adults with acquired brain injury following discharge from inpatient rehabilitation","authors":"M. Foster, M. Legg, Eloise Hummell, L. Burridge, Kirstyn Laurie","doi":"10.1017/brimp.2020.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The intention of this paper is to develop the personal concept of appropriate access. We report on the service access experiences and opportunities of adults with an acquired brain injury after leaving inpatient rehabilitation. The benefits of appropriate access underpin standards in early and long-term recovery, though users' access needs are highly personal. \nMethods: The study used a qualitative design involving 16 semi-structured interviews with Australian adults with an acquired brain injury after discharge from inpatient brain rehabilitation. Data were thematically analysed. \nResults: Three main themes were derived from the analysis. Theme 1 shows that participants valued being steered to services that providers thought appropriate for them early after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Theme 2 highlights the tensions between timing and personal recovery and perceived needs. Theme 3 captures participants' insights into the challenges of gaining access vis-a-vis what the system offers and the enablers of actualising appropriate access. \nConclusion: The positive experiences of being directed to specialist services early after discharge suggest that continuity of care constitutes appropriateness of access for participants in this study. However, it is also clear that continuity should not displace flexibility in the timing of services, to accord with individuals' perceived needs. This, in addition to enablement of access opportunities, through funding and transport, are important in maintaining a personalised approach.","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"57 1","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Impairment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/brimp.2020.12","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: The intention of this paper is to develop the personal concept of appropriate access. We report on the service access experiences and opportunities of adults with an acquired brain injury after leaving inpatient rehabilitation. The benefits of appropriate access underpin standards in early and long-term recovery, though users' access needs are highly personal. Methods: The study used a qualitative design involving 16 semi-structured interviews with Australian adults with an acquired brain injury after discharge from inpatient brain rehabilitation. Data were thematically analysed. Results: Three main themes were derived from the analysis. Theme 1 shows that participants valued being steered to services that providers thought appropriate for them early after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Theme 2 highlights the tensions between timing and personal recovery and perceived needs. Theme 3 captures participants' insights into the challenges of gaining access vis-a-vis what the system offers and the enablers of actualising appropriate access. Conclusion: The positive experiences of being directed to specialist services early after discharge suggest that continuity of care constitutes appropriateness of access for participants in this study. However, it is also clear that continuity should not displace flexibility in the timing of services, to accord with individuals' perceived needs. This, in addition to enablement of access opportunities, through funding and transport, are important in maintaining a personalised approach.
合适的人,合适的时间?成人获得性脑损伤住院康复出院后服务获取体验的定性研究
目的:本文的目的是发展个人适当访问的概念。我们报告的服务访问经验和机会成人获得性脑损伤后离开住院康复。适当访问的好处是早期和长期恢复标准的基础,尽管用户的访问需求是高度个性化的。方法:本研究采用定性设计,包括16个半结构化访谈,访谈对象为住院脑康复出院后获得性脑损伤的澳大利亚成年人。对数据进行主题分析。结果:从分析中得出三个主要主题。主题1表明,参与者重视从住院康复出院后早期被引导到提供者认为适合他们的服务。主题2强调了时间和个人恢复与感知需求之间的紧张关系。主题3阐述了与会者对系统提供的内容和实现适当访问的推动因素所带来的获取访问的挑战的见解。结论:出院后早期被指导到专家服务的积极经验表明,连续性护理构成了本研究参与者的适当性。然而,同样明显的是,连续性不应取代服务时间的灵活性,以符合个人的需要。除了通过资金和运输提供获取机会之外,这对于保持个性化方法也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Impairment
Brain Impairment CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal addresses topics related to the aetiology, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes of brain impairment with a particular focus on the implications for functional status, participation, rehabilitation and quality of life. Disciplines reflect a broad multidisciplinary scope and include neuroscience, neurology, neuropsychology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, speech pathology, social work, and nursing. Submissions are welcome across the full range of conditions that affect brain function (stroke, tumour, progressive neurological illnesses, dementia, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, etc.) throughout the lifespan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信