{"title":"ANALISIS KESULITAN SISWA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH FISIKA BERBENTUK GRAFIK","authors":"Anton Setyono, S. E. Nugroho, I. Yulianti","doi":"10.15294/upej.v5i3.13678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kemampuan pemecahan masalah berbentuk grafik dan profil kesulitannya khususnya pada materi gerak lurus. Metode penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif. Penelitian ini dilakukan di SMP N 06 Petarukan. Subjek penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII A. Metode pengambilan data dengan tes diagnostik dan dengan didukung oleh wawancara. Analisis dilakukan dengan menggunakan deskriptif persentase. Hasilnya menunjukan bahwa rata – rata kemampuan pemecahan masalah grafik masih rendah dengan persentase setiap kemampuannya dimulai kemampuan interpretasi grafik (48,30%), kemampuan interpolasi (34,36%), kemampuan ekstrapolasi (53,01%), dan kemampuan transformasi (48,61%). Profil kesulitan siswa didasarkan pada pencapaian KKM, pengetahuan prasyarat, profil materi, miskonsepsi, serta tahap – tahap pemecahan masalahnya. Berdasarkan penguasaan KKM, siswa masih mengalami kesulitan untuk semua indikator. Untuk profil kesulitan siswa berdasarkan pengetahuan prasyaratnya, siswa tidak mengalami kesulitan dalam menentukan luas bangun datar, tetapi pada operasi hitung dan persamaan linier termasuk dalam kategori kesulitan sedang. Untuk profil kesulitan siswa berdasarkan profil materi, siswa masih mengalami kesulitan untuk semua sub materi terutama percepatan. Profil kesulitan siswa berdasarkan miskonsepsi termasuk dalam kategori kesulitan tinggi (63,89%). Serta yang terakhir, profil kesulitan siswa berdasarkan tahap – tahap pemecahan masalah. Kesulitan siswa semakin naik dari mulai tahapan terendah yaitu tahap memahami masalah dan tahapan tertinggi yaitu tahap peninjauan kembali. This study aims to find the ability of problem solving in graph and to describes the difficulty of students, especially in the chapter straight motion. This research method is qualitative research. This research was conducted in SMP N 6 Petarukan. The subjects were students of class VIII A. The data collection method with diagnostic tests and supported by interviews. Analysis conducted by using descriptive percentages These results indicate that the average problem-solving ability is still low with the percentage of each capability is the interpretation of the graph (48.30%), the ability of interpolation (34.36%), the ability of extrapolation (53.01%), and the ability of transformation (48, 61%). To describe the difficulty students in this research are based achievement of KKM, prerequisite knowledge, the chapter describe, misconceptions, and step in solving the problem. Description of student difficulties by KKM mastery, students are still experiencing difficulties for all indicators. Description of difficulties students based knowledge prerequisites, students have no trouble in determining the broad flat wake, but the arithmetic operation and linear equations included in the category of medium difficulty. To describe student difficulties by chapter, students still have difficulties to all sub chapters especially acceleration. Description of the difficulties students based on misconceptions included in the category of high difficulty (63.89%). The last, description of the difficulties students based on the stage of problem solving. Student difficulties getting up from the lowest stage is the stage of understanding the problem, and the highest stage is the stage of reconsideration.","PeriodicalId":30731,"journal":{"name":"UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"32-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v5i3.13678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kemampuan pemecahan masalah berbentuk grafik dan profil kesulitannya khususnya pada materi gerak lurus. Metode penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif. Penelitian ini dilakukan di SMP N 06 Petarukan. Subjek penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII A. Metode pengambilan data dengan tes diagnostik dan dengan didukung oleh wawancara. Analisis dilakukan dengan menggunakan deskriptif persentase. Hasilnya menunjukan bahwa rata – rata kemampuan pemecahan masalah grafik masih rendah dengan persentase setiap kemampuannya dimulai kemampuan interpretasi grafik (48,30%), kemampuan interpolasi (34,36%), kemampuan ekstrapolasi (53,01%), dan kemampuan transformasi (48,61%). Profil kesulitan siswa didasarkan pada pencapaian KKM, pengetahuan prasyarat, profil materi, miskonsepsi, serta tahap – tahap pemecahan masalahnya. Berdasarkan penguasaan KKM, siswa masih mengalami kesulitan untuk semua indikator. Untuk profil kesulitan siswa berdasarkan pengetahuan prasyaratnya, siswa tidak mengalami kesulitan dalam menentukan luas bangun datar, tetapi pada operasi hitung dan persamaan linier termasuk dalam kategori kesulitan sedang. Untuk profil kesulitan siswa berdasarkan profil materi, siswa masih mengalami kesulitan untuk semua sub materi terutama percepatan. Profil kesulitan siswa berdasarkan miskonsepsi termasuk dalam kategori kesulitan tinggi (63,89%). Serta yang terakhir, profil kesulitan siswa berdasarkan tahap – tahap pemecahan masalah. Kesulitan siswa semakin naik dari mulai tahapan terendah yaitu tahap memahami masalah dan tahapan tertinggi yaitu tahap peninjauan kembali. This study aims to find the ability of problem solving in graph and to describes the difficulty of students, especially in the chapter straight motion. This research method is qualitative research. This research was conducted in SMP N 6 Petarukan. The subjects were students of class VIII A. The data collection method with diagnostic tests and supported by interviews. Analysis conducted by using descriptive percentages These results indicate that the average problem-solving ability is still low with the percentage of each capability is the interpretation of the graph (48.30%), the ability of interpolation (34.36%), the ability of extrapolation (53.01%), and the ability of transformation (48, 61%). To describe the difficulty students in this research are based achievement of KKM, prerequisite knowledge, the chapter describe, misconceptions, and step in solving the problem. Description of student difficulties by KKM mastery, students are still experiencing difficulties for all indicators. Description of difficulties students based knowledge prerequisites, students have no trouble in determining the broad flat wake, but the arithmetic operation and linear equations included in the category of medium difficulty. To describe student difficulties by chapter, students still have difficulties to all sub chapters especially acceleration. Description of the difficulties students based on misconceptions included in the category of high difficulty (63.89%). The last, description of the difficulties students based on the stage of problem solving. Student difficulties getting up from the lowest stage is the stage of understanding the problem, and the highest stage is the stage of reconsideration.
本研究的目的是确定图表问题的解决能力和困难轮廓,特别是直线运动材料。本研究方法是定性研究。这项研究是在06战中进行的。本研究对象是八年级A班的学生,采用诊断测试和访谈支持的数据检索方法。分析使用描述性的百分比进行。结果表明,图表问题解决的平均水平仍然很低,每个能力的百分比都是从解释能力(48.30%)、插值能力(34.36%)、推断能力(53.01%)和转换能力(48.61%)开始的。学生的困难档案是基于KKM的成就、先决条件知识、资料、missepsi和问题的解决阶段。根据对公里的掌握,学生对所有指标仍然有困难。对于学生的困难配置,根据他们的偏见知识,学生在确定平的面积方面没有困难,但在算术操作和线性方程中属于中度困难的类别。对于学生困难档案基于材料配置文件,学生仍然对所有的子物质特别是加速度都有困难。基于错误概念的学生困难档案属于高难度类别(63.89%)。最后,基于问题解决阶段的学生困难概况。学生的困难从理解问题的最低阶段开始增加,最高阶段到复习阶段。这项研究旨在发现在图中解决问题的能力,并描述学生的困难,特别是在连续章节中。这个研究方法是有资格的研究。这个研究是由smp6培养出来的。测试对象是八年级A班的学生,他们收集了通过面试检测和支持的诊断方法。分析用descriptive conducted by percentages这些results indicate that the平均problem-solving不在乎每还是低with the percentage of -能力是graph解释》(48 . 30%),《interpolation不在乎不在乎》(34 . 36%),extrapolation不在乎》(53 . 01%),和转型(48,61%)。为了描述这项研究中不同的学生是基于几公里的成就、知识分子、章节描述、误解和解决问题。学生与KKM mastery的关系不同,学生们仍在经历对所有参与者的困难。基于先验知识的困难学生,学生在确定扁平的底座上没有问题,而是算术和线性方程包含在困难的媒介类别中。为了描述一个学生有困难的章节,学生们仍然对所有的子章节特别是加速度有困难。基于误解的困难学生的描述包含在高难度的类别(63.89%)中。最后,关于在问题解决阶段的困难学生的描述。学生们很难理解这个问题的阶段,最高的阶段就是重新考虑的阶段。