Chinese writing development of Kindergarten students over 12 months

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
L. Li, M. Mok, Weidong Wu
{"title":"Chinese writing development of Kindergarten students over 12 months","authors":"L. Li, M. Mok, Weidong Wu","doi":"10.1108/IJCED-05-2019-0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to examine the writing development of Hong Kong kindergarten students over 12 months. They attended 18 kindergartens territory-wide and were followed from June 2002 to June 2003 for the collection of three waves of teacher-rated data at six-month intervals.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nFirst, the construct validity of the translated and culturally adapted version of Morrow’s (2012) checklist which assesses writing development was confirmed, considering that the students attended Hong Kong kindergartens who wrote in the Chinese language. The multilevel analysis, which employed corrected measures captured through Wolfe and Chiu’s (1999a, 1999b) five-step Rasch scaling method for a common frame of reference, estimated the effects of the factors, namely, student age, gender, class level and schools.\n\n\nFindings\nThe children’s progress over the second six months was also apparently much smaller than the first SIX months for this cohort. The dramatic slow-down in the second six-month period for both cohorts might be partly attributed to the peculiar arrangement of schooling at that time.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe recommendation from this study is that random sampling and student test scores on writing need to be taken for the identification of the general trend of young children’s writing development in Hong Kong, as well as other Chinese communities alike.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe profile of the student’s emergent writing development at each six-month follow-up and over the 12 months was explored. Differences between the groups based on age, gender, class level and school in terms of student writing development on average were statistically significant.\n","PeriodicalId":51967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Education and Development","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-05-2019-0032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the writing development of Hong Kong kindergarten students over 12 months. They attended 18 kindergartens territory-wide and were followed from June 2002 to June 2003 for the collection of three waves of teacher-rated data at six-month intervals. Design/methodology/approach First, the construct validity of the translated and culturally adapted version of Morrow’s (2012) checklist which assesses writing development was confirmed, considering that the students attended Hong Kong kindergartens who wrote in the Chinese language. The multilevel analysis, which employed corrected measures captured through Wolfe and Chiu’s (1999a, 1999b) five-step Rasch scaling method for a common frame of reference, estimated the effects of the factors, namely, student age, gender, class level and schools. Findings The children’s progress over the second six months was also apparently much smaller than the first SIX months for this cohort. The dramatic slow-down in the second six-month period for both cohorts might be partly attributed to the peculiar arrangement of schooling at that time. Research limitations/implications The recommendation from this study is that random sampling and student test scores on writing need to be taken for the identification of the general trend of young children’s writing development in Hong Kong, as well as other Chinese communities alike. Originality/value The profile of the student’s emergent writing development at each six-month follow-up and over the 12 months was explored. Differences between the groups based on age, gender, class level and school in terms of student writing development on average were statistically significant.
12个月以上幼稚园学生的中文写作发展
目的研究香港幼稚园学生12个月以上的写作发展情况。他们于2002年6月至2003年6月期间在全港18所幼稚园就读,每隔6个月收集三次教师评分数据。设计/方法/方法首先,考虑到在香港上幼儿园的学生用中文写作,我们确认了莫罗(2012)评估写作发展的检查表的翻译和文化改编版本的结构有效性。多水平分析采用Wolfe和Chiu (1999a, 1999b)的五步Rasch标度法对一个共同参考框架进行修正,估计了学生年龄、性别、班级水平和学校等因素的影响。孩子们在后六个月的进步也明显比前六个月小得多。在第二个6个月期间,这两个群体的入学率急剧下降,部分原因可能是当时学校的特殊安排。研究的局限/意义本研究建议,在确定香港及其他华人社区幼儿写作发展的大趋势时,应采用随机抽样和学生的写作测试成绩。原创性/价值在每6个月的随访和12个月的随访中,研究了学生的紧急写作发展概况。不同年龄、性别、班级水平和学校的学生在平均写作发展方面的差异有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信