Evaluation of the use of acid mine drainage (AMD) sludge as soil amendment

Amanda Rodrigues Silva, Brady Watters, J. Quaranta, L. Hopkinson
{"title":"Evaluation of the use of acid mine drainage (AMD) sludge as soil amendment","authors":"Amanda Rodrigues Silva, Brady Watters, J. Quaranta, L. Hopkinson","doi":"10.55632/pwvas.v94i3.941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The treatment of acid mine drainage (AMD) involves chemical additives to raise pH and precipitate solubilized metals. The byproduct of this process is an AMD sludge precipitate, and its management and disposal are a continuous environmental legacy.  This study evaluated the application of AMD sludge as a soil amendment to support vegetation establishment. A small-scale growth study was completed with six treatments composed of different proportions of topsoil and AMD sludge as follows:  i) 100% topsoil, ii) 10% sludge, and 90% topsoil, iii) 20% sludge and 80% topsoil, iv) 30% sludge and 70% topsoil), v) 40% sludge and 60% topsoil), and vi) 50% sludge and 50% topsoil. Four replications of each treatment were considered.  Ground cover was monitored weekly for nine weeks (September 29, 2021 – December 2, 2021). Stem length and biomass were measured. Groundcover varied from 14.6% to 70.1% among all treatments throughout the study; all treatments were determined as statistically similar to the 100% topsoil treatment. Biomass ranged from 1.41 to 6.22 g, and average stem length varied from 3.6 to 4.6 cm.  Toxicity did not exceed minimum levels for one representative sludge sample. This preliminary study provides support for the further advancing AMD sludge as a soil amendment.","PeriodicalId":92280,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the West Virginia Academy of Science","volume":"202 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the West Virginia Academy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55632/pwvas.v94i3.941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The treatment of acid mine drainage (AMD) involves chemical additives to raise pH and precipitate solubilized metals. The byproduct of this process is an AMD sludge precipitate, and its management and disposal are a continuous environmental legacy.  This study evaluated the application of AMD sludge as a soil amendment to support vegetation establishment. A small-scale growth study was completed with six treatments composed of different proportions of topsoil and AMD sludge as follows:  i) 100% topsoil, ii) 10% sludge, and 90% topsoil, iii) 20% sludge and 80% topsoil, iv) 30% sludge and 70% topsoil), v) 40% sludge and 60% topsoil), and vi) 50% sludge and 50% topsoil. Four replications of each treatment were considered.  Ground cover was monitored weekly for nine weeks (September 29, 2021 – December 2, 2021). Stem length and biomass were measured. Groundcover varied from 14.6% to 70.1% among all treatments throughout the study; all treatments were determined as statistically similar to the 100% topsoil treatment. Biomass ranged from 1.41 to 6.22 g, and average stem length varied from 3.6 to 4.6 cm.  Toxicity did not exceed minimum levels for one representative sludge sample. This preliminary study provides support for the further advancing AMD sludge as a soil amendment.
酸性矿井水(AMD)污泥作为土壤改良剂的评价
酸性矿井水(AMD)的处理涉及化学添加剂,以提高pH和沉淀溶解金属。该过程的副产品是AMD污泥沉淀,其管理和处置是一个持续的环境遗产。本研究评估了AMD污泥作为土壤改良剂支持植被建立的应用。采用表土和AMD污泥不同比例组成的六种处理方法完成了小规模生长研究,分别为:i) 100%表土,ii) 10%污泥和90%表土,iii) 20%污泥和80%表土,iv) 30%污泥和70%表土),v) 40%污泥和60%表土),vi) 50%污泥和50%表土。每种处理考虑4次重复。地面覆盖每周监测9周(2021年9月29日至2021年12月2日)。测定茎长和生物量。在整个研究过程中,所有处理的地被盖度从14.6%到70.1%不等;所有处理均与100%表土处理在统计学上相似。生物量1.41 ~ 6.22 g,平均茎长3.6 ~ 4.6 cm。毒性未超过一个代表性污泥样品的最低水平。本初步研究为进一步推进AMD污泥作为土壤改良剂提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信