WHO Needs to Re-look at Animal Bite Wound Classification for Rabies Post Exposure Prophylaxis to Save People from Deadly Rabies!

O. Bharti
{"title":"WHO Needs to Re-look at Animal Bite Wound Classification for Rabies Post Exposure Prophylaxis to Save People from Deadly Rabies!","authors":"O. Bharti","doi":"10.24321/2455.7048.202219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rabies is a deadly zoonotic disease that is largely caused by bites or scratches of an infected dog. WHO has defined wound classifications for taking decisions on Rabies Post Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) after bites. Some experts have suggested a change in WHO classification to include another category IV in severe wounds. As we work in the rabies endemic country contributing the highest number of rabies deaths annually, we discuss what changes in Rabies PEP classification are actually required based on our clinical practice. We discuss here how the lives of victims of rabid animals were saved and what factors led to the failures of PEP. We also discuss why there is no need to expand existing wound classification to category IV and no need to use higher concentrations of RIG for severe wounds like those on the head and neck. We recommend omitting category II and keeping only categories I and III for wound classification for rabies PEP based on our clinical experience with rabid dog bites and scratches i.e. either there is exposure or no exposure using spirit test in doubtful abrasions without bleeding. Moreover, because the rabies virus attaches to the nerve at the site of the bite and there is no viraemia in rabies infection, therefore, to classify a scratch or abrasion with or without bleeding is not rational.","PeriodicalId":89674,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology Research International","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24321/2455.7048.202219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rabies is a deadly zoonotic disease that is largely caused by bites or scratches of an infected dog. WHO has defined wound classifications for taking decisions on Rabies Post Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) after bites. Some experts have suggested a change in WHO classification to include another category IV in severe wounds. As we work in the rabies endemic country contributing the highest number of rabies deaths annually, we discuss what changes in Rabies PEP classification are actually required based on our clinical practice. We discuss here how the lives of victims of rabid animals were saved and what factors led to the failures of PEP. We also discuss why there is no need to expand existing wound classification to category IV and no need to use higher concentrations of RIG for severe wounds like those on the head and neck. We recommend omitting category II and keeping only categories I and III for wound classification for rabies PEP based on our clinical experience with rabid dog bites and scratches i.e. either there is exposure or no exposure using spirit test in doubtful abrasions without bleeding. Moreover, because the rabies virus attaches to the nerve at the site of the bite and there is no viraemia in rabies infection, therefore, to classify a scratch or abrasion with or without bleeding is not rational.
世卫组织需要重新审视狂犬病暴露后预防的动物咬伤分类,以拯救人们免于致命的狂犬病!
狂犬病是一种致命的人畜共患疾病,主要由被感染的狗咬伤或抓伤引起。世卫组织确定了伤口分类,以便在咬伤后就狂犬病暴露后预防作出决定。一些专家建议改变世卫组织的分类,在严重伤口中增加第四类。由于我们在每年狂犬病死亡人数最多的狂犬病流行国家开展工作,我们将根据我们的临床实践讨论狂犬病PEP分类实际上需要哪些变化。我们在此讨论如何挽救患狂犬病动物的生命,以及导致PEP失败的因素。我们还讨论了为什么没有必要将现有的伤口分类扩大到IV类,以及为什么没有必要对头颈部等严重伤口使用更高浓度的RIG。根据我们对狂犬病犬咬伤和抓伤的临床经验,我们建议省略第二类,只保留第一类和第三类狂犬病PEP的伤口分类,即对可疑擦伤进行精神测试,在没有出血的情况下,要么有暴露,要么没有暴露。此外,由于狂犬病毒附着在咬伤部位的神经上,而狂犬感染中没有病毒血症,因此,对有或没有出血的划伤或擦伤进行分类是不合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信