Peerless? How students' experience of synchronous online teaching can disrupt the development of relationships to peers, teachers, subject and self

IF 3.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Isabel Hopwood
{"title":"Peerless? How students' experience of synchronous online teaching can disrupt the development of relationships to peers, teachers, subject and self","authors":"Isabel Hopwood","doi":"10.58459/rptel.2023.18007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nLearning is socially constructed, influenced by the norms of the learning environment as well as the relationships within it. As higher education students continue to access their learning through online platforms during the pandemic, some find the experience stressful and intimidating. Higher education students develop four key relationships during their studies: to self, to teachers, to peers and to subject. Might the shift to online learning have impacted the development of these key relationships? And if so, could adjustments to the design of online learning help? Thematic analysis of student feedback about online learning provision (n=496) indicates peer relationships are disrupted by limited interactional opportunity during some online learning formats, and that the peer relationship plays a mediating role in the development of other key relationships. Problematic synchronous teaching formats are identified and mitigations suggested. These findings are of interest to all seeking to optimise the design and delivery of online learning. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":37055,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":"22 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2023.18007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Learning is socially constructed, influenced by the norms of the learning environment as well as the relationships within it. As higher education students continue to access their learning through online platforms during the pandemic, some find the experience stressful and intimidating. Higher education students develop four key relationships during their studies: to self, to teachers, to peers and to subject. Might the shift to online learning have impacted the development of these key relationships? And if so, could adjustments to the design of online learning help? Thematic analysis of student feedback about online learning provision (n=496) indicates peer relationships are disrupted by limited interactional opportunity during some online learning formats, and that the peer relationship plays a mediating role in the development of other key relationships. Problematic synchronous teaching formats are identified and mitigations suggested. These findings are of interest to all seeking to optimise the design and delivery of online learning.
无与伦比的吗?学生对同步在线教学的体验是如何破坏他们与同伴、老师、学科和自我之间关系的发展的
学习是社会建构的,受学习环境的规范以及其中的关系的影响。由于高等教育学生在疫情期间继续通过在线平台学习,一些人觉得这种经历充满压力和恐惧。接受高等教育的学生在学习过程中发展了四种关键的关系:与自我、与老师、与同伴和与主体。向在线学习的转变是否影响了这些关键关系的发展?如果是这样,调整在线学习的设计会有帮助吗?对在线学习提供的学生反馈的专题分析(n=496)表明,在某些在线学习形式中,同伴关系因有限的互动机会而中断,同伴关系在其他关键关系的发展中起中介作用。发现了有问题的同步教学格式,并提出了缓解措施。这些发现对所有寻求优化在线学习设计和交付的人都很有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
28
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信