Educator Feedback Skill Assessment: An Educational Survey Design Study

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES

International Journal of Medical Education Pub Date : 2022-12-09 DOI:10.3390/ime1020012

A. Moroz, Jennifer P. Stone, Francis Lopez, Cynthia Racine, K. Carmody

{"title":"Educator Feedback Skill Assessment: An Educational Survey Design Study","authors":"A. Moroz, Jennifer P. Stone, Francis Lopez, Cynthia Racine, K. Carmody","doi":"10.3390/ime1020012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Delivering impactful feedback is a skill that is difficult to measure. To date there is no generalizable assessment instrument which measures the quality of medical education feedback. The purpose of the present study was to create an instrument for measuring educator feedback skills. Methods: Building on pilot work, we refined an assessment instrument and addressed content and construct validity using expert validation (qualitative and quantitative). This was followed by cognitive interviews of faculty from several clinical departments, which were transcribed and analyzed using ATLAS.ti qualitative software. A research team revised and improved the assessment instrument. Results: Expert validation and cognitive interviews resulted in the Educator Feedback Skills Assessment, a scale with 10 items and three response options for each. Conclusions: Building on the contemporary medical education literature and empiric pilot work, we created and refined an assessment instrument for measuring educator feedback skills. We also started the argument on validity and addressed content validity.","PeriodicalId":14029,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ime1020012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Delivering impactful feedback is a skill that is difficult to measure. To date there is no generalizable assessment instrument which measures the quality of medical education feedback. The purpose of the present study was to create an instrument for measuring educator feedback skills. Methods: Building on pilot work, we refined an assessment instrument and addressed content and construct validity using expert validation (qualitative and quantitative). This was followed by cognitive interviews of faculty from several clinical departments, which were transcribed and analyzed using ATLAS.ti qualitative software. A research team revised and improved the assessment instrument. Results: Expert validation and cognitive interviews resulted in the Educator Feedback Skills Assessment, a scale with 10 items and three response options for each. Conclusions: Building on the contemporary medical education literature and empiric pilot work, we created and refined an assessment instrument for measuring educator feedback skills. We also started the argument on validity and addressed content validity.

查看原文本刊更多论文

教育工作者反馈技能评估:一项教育调查设计研究

背景:传递有影响力的反馈是一项难以衡量的技能。迄今为止，还没有一种通用的评估工具来衡量医学教育反馈的质量。本研究的目的是建立一个测量教育工作者反馈技能的工具。方法:在试点工作的基础上，我们完善了评估工具，并采用专家验证(定性和定量)来解决内容和构建效度。随后对来自几个临床科室的教师进行认知访谈，并使用ATLAS进行转录和分析。定性软件。课题组对评估工具进行了修订和完善。结果:专家验证和认知访谈产生了教育者反馈技能评估，这是一个有10个项目和每个项目三个回答选项的量表。结论:在当代医学教育文献和实证试点工作的基础上，我们创建并完善了一个测量教育者反馈技能的评估工具。我们还开始了关于有效性的争论，并讨论了内容有效性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-

CiteScore

3.90

自引率

3.20%

发文量