A systematic review of Green AI

IF 6.4 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
R. Verdecchia, June Sallou, Luís Cruz
{"title":"A systematic review of Green AI","authors":"R. Verdecchia, June Sallou, Luís Cruz","doi":"10.1002/widm.1507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the ever‐growing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI)‐based systems, the carbon footprint of AI is no longer negligible. AI researchers and practitioners are therefore urged to hold themselves accountable for the carbon emissions of the AI models they design and use. This led in recent years to the appearance of researches tackling AI environmental sustainability, a field referred to as Green AI. Despite the rapid growth of interest in the topic, a comprehensive overview of Green AI research is to date still missing. To address this gap, in this article, we present a systematic review of the Green AI literature. From the analysis of 98 primary studies, different patterns emerge. The topic experienced a considerable growth from 2020 onward. Most studies consider monitoring AI model footprint, tuning hyperparameters to improve model sustainability, or benchmarking models. A mix of position papers, observational studies, and solution papers are present. Most papers focus on the training phase, are algorithm‐agnostic or study neural networks, and use image data. Laboratory experiments are the most common research strategy. Reported Green AI energy savings go up to 115%, with savings over 50% being rather common. Industrial parties are involved in Green AI studies, albeit most target academic readers. Green AI tool provisioning is scarce. As a conclusion, the Green AI research field results to have reached a considerable level of maturity. Therefore, from this review emerges that the time is suitable to adopt other Green AI research strategies, and port the numerous promising academic results to industrial practice.","PeriodicalId":48970,"journal":{"name":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery","volume":"232 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1507","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

With the ever‐growing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI)‐based systems, the carbon footprint of AI is no longer negligible. AI researchers and practitioners are therefore urged to hold themselves accountable for the carbon emissions of the AI models they design and use. This led in recent years to the appearance of researches tackling AI environmental sustainability, a field referred to as Green AI. Despite the rapid growth of interest in the topic, a comprehensive overview of Green AI research is to date still missing. To address this gap, in this article, we present a systematic review of the Green AI literature. From the analysis of 98 primary studies, different patterns emerge. The topic experienced a considerable growth from 2020 onward. Most studies consider monitoring AI model footprint, tuning hyperparameters to improve model sustainability, or benchmarking models. A mix of position papers, observational studies, and solution papers are present. Most papers focus on the training phase, are algorithm‐agnostic or study neural networks, and use image data. Laboratory experiments are the most common research strategy. Reported Green AI energy savings go up to 115%, with savings over 50% being rather common. Industrial parties are involved in Green AI studies, albeit most target academic readers. Green AI tool provisioning is scarce. As a conclusion, the Green AI research field results to have reached a considerable level of maturity. Therefore, from this review emerges that the time is suitable to adopt other Green AI research strategies, and port the numerous promising academic results to industrial practice.

Abstract Image

绿色人工智能的系统回顾
随着人工智能(AI)系统的日益普及,人工智能的碳足迹不再是可以忽略不计的。因此,人工智能研究人员和从业者被敦促对他们设计和使用的人工智能模型的碳排放负责。这导致近年来出现了针对人工智能环境可持续性的研究,这一领域被称为绿色人工智能。尽管对这一主题的兴趣迅速增长,但迄今为止,对绿色人工智能研究的全面概述仍然缺失。为了解决这一差距,在本文中,我们对绿色人工智能文献进行了系统回顾。通过对98项初步研究的分析,我们发现了不同的模式。从2020年开始,这个话题经历了相当大的增长。大多数研究考虑监测人工智能模型的足迹,调整超参数以提高模型的可持续性,或对模型进行基准测试。本文包含立场论文、观察研究和解决方案论文。大多数论文关注于训练阶段,与算法无关或研究神经网络,并使用图像数据。实验室实验是最常用的研究策略。据报道,绿色人工智能节能高达115%,其中超过50%的节能相当普遍。工业界也参与了绿色人工智能研究,尽管大多数针对的是学术读者。绿色人工智能工具供应稀缺。综上所述,绿色人工智能研究领域的成果已经达到了相当成熟的水平。因此,从这一综述中可以看出,现在是时候采用其他绿色人工智能研究策略,并将众多有前途的学术成果移植到工业实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
CiteScore
22.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goals of Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (WIREs DMKD) are multifaceted. Firstly, the journal aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of data mining and knowledge discovery by featuring ongoing reviews authored by leading researchers. Secondly, it seeks to highlight the interdisciplinary nature of the field by presenting articles from diverse perspectives, covering various application areas such as technology, business, healthcare, education, government, society, and culture. Thirdly, WIREs DMKD endeavors to keep pace with the rapid advancements in data mining and knowledge discovery through regular content updates. Lastly, the journal strives to promote active engagement in the field by presenting its accomplishments and challenges in an accessible manner to a broad audience. The content of WIREs DMKD is intended to benefit upper-level undergraduate and postgraduate students, teaching and research professors in academic programs, as well as scientists and research managers in industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信