Product Level Design Optimization for 2.5D Package Pad Cratering Reliability During Drop Impact

Huayan Wang, Jing Wang, Jiefeng Xu, Van-Lai Pham, K. Pan, Seungbae Park, Hohyun Lee, G. Refai-Ahmed
{"title":"Product Level Design Optimization for 2.5D Package Pad Cratering Reliability During Drop Impact","authors":"Huayan Wang, Jing Wang, Jiefeng Xu, Van-Lai Pham, K. Pan, Seungbae Park, Hohyun Lee, G. Refai-Ahmed","doi":"10.1109/ECTC.2019.00323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conversion from using tin-lead solder joint to lead-free solder joint has raised many pad cratering failures for electronics manufacturing. This phenomenon has become more severe to the 2.5D package which has a large heatsink attached on the top. The pad cratering issue has been found during testing, handling or transport due to a single overload. The package qualification process requires that it passes the board level drop test before shipping, however, this doesn't always guarantee that the package will survive from product level drop, especially for a complicated design product. Many types of research have been conducted to improve the package's board-level pad cratering reliability, few emphases were put on the product design. The aim of the present study is to evaluate several product design parameters with respect to PCB stress, using numerical methods. Several different design variables, such as reinforcement structure, heatsink size, pad design, were studied. Data are presented to show the effects of the above factors and to highlight the main factor to cause the pad cratering failure.","PeriodicalId":6726,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 69th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)","volume":"37 1","pages":"2343-2348"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 69th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2019.00323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The conversion from using tin-lead solder joint to lead-free solder joint has raised many pad cratering failures for electronics manufacturing. This phenomenon has become more severe to the 2.5D package which has a large heatsink attached on the top. The pad cratering issue has been found during testing, handling or transport due to a single overload. The package qualification process requires that it passes the board level drop test before shipping, however, this doesn't always guarantee that the package will survive from product level drop, especially for a complicated design product. Many types of research have been conducted to improve the package's board-level pad cratering reliability, few emphases were put on the product design. The aim of the present study is to evaluate several product design parameters with respect to PCB stress, using numerical methods. Several different design variables, such as reinforcement structure, heatsink size, pad design, were studied. Data are presented to show the effects of the above factors and to highlight the main factor to cause the pad cratering failure.
2.5D封装衬垫跌落冲击可靠性的产品级设计优化
从使用锡铅焊点到无铅焊点的转变为电子制造带来了许多焊坑故障。这种现象在顶部附有大型散热器的2.5D封装中变得更加严重。在测试、处理或运输过程中,由于单一过载而发现了垫坑问题。封装认证过程要求在发货前通过电路板水平下降测试,然而,这并不总是保证封装在产品水平下降中存活下来,特别是对于复杂设计的产品。为了提高封装的板级衬垫击穿可靠性,已经进行了许多研究,但很少重视产品设计。本研究的目的是利用数值方法评估PCB应力方面的几个产品设计参数。研究了几种不同的设计变量,如加固结构、散热器尺寸、衬垫设计。数据显示了上述因素的影响,并突出了导致垫坑失效的主要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信