Cryptocurrencies and Market Efficiency

S. S. Kumar
{"title":"Cryptocurrencies and Market Efficiency","authors":"S. S. Kumar","doi":"10.21648/ARTHAVIJ/2021/V63/I1/208209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The exponential growth and volatility of cryptocurrencies have led to a global interest in crypto assets and their distribution as digital wealth. Currently, cryptocurrencies and tokenised gold are the two popular digital wealth. While tokenised gold has the backing of un-mined physical gold, crypto has the support of an ideology-driven trust with the patronage of a mining process using supercomputing power that rewards coins. Thus, the acceptance of cryptocurrency as a reliable digital wealth depends to a large extent on its price consistency and the related independence. Many researchers tested the price efficiency of Bitcoin for different time periods up to 2017. In most cases, inefficiencies of the coins were inferred by them. Furthermore, many studies focused on the long-run and short-run volatility dynamics of Bitcoins leaving the altcoins almost unexamined. Therefore, a fresh look at the price efficiency and the inter-relationships of Bitcoin and the three altcoins, which altogether have a market capitalization of nearly 80 per cent, is attempted here. In all, six rigorous tests for independence or random walk are applied on the daily returns of the coins. Bitcoin returns showed a random walk in four out of the six tests, Ethereum and Ripple in three tests, and Bitcoin Cash only in two tests. The strong symptoms of weak form of efficiency found at least in the case of Bitcoin can be considered as its acceptance as a digital wealth. While the daily returns of all the four cryptos have a long-run equilibrium, the daily prices of Bitcoin, Ethereum and Bitcoin Cash excluding Ripple showed cointegration among themselves. Nearly 88 per cent of the short-run fluctuations in Bitcoin returns are adjusted on a daily basis. Bitcoin Granger Cause Ethereum and Ripple, a bidirectional Granger Causality is found between Ripple and Ethereum. Thus, the acceptance of cryptos, especially Bitcoin, as a digital wealth option can increase in the future.","PeriodicalId":84206,"journal":{"name":"Artha vijnana : journal of the Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Poona (India) = Artha vijnana : Gokhale Artha Sastra Samstha Dvara Prakasita Traimesika Patrika","volume":"42 1","pages":"35-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artha vijnana : journal of the Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Poona (India) = Artha vijnana : Gokhale Artha Sastra Samstha Dvara Prakasita Traimesika Patrika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21648/ARTHAVIJ/2021/V63/I1/208209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The exponential growth and volatility of cryptocurrencies have led to a global interest in crypto assets and their distribution as digital wealth. Currently, cryptocurrencies and tokenised gold are the two popular digital wealth. While tokenised gold has the backing of un-mined physical gold, crypto has the support of an ideology-driven trust with the patronage of a mining process using supercomputing power that rewards coins. Thus, the acceptance of cryptocurrency as a reliable digital wealth depends to a large extent on its price consistency and the related independence. Many researchers tested the price efficiency of Bitcoin for different time periods up to 2017. In most cases, inefficiencies of the coins were inferred by them. Furthermore, many studies focused on the long-run and short-run volatility dynamics of Bitcoins leaving the altcoins almost unexamined. Therefore, a fresh look at the price efficiency and the inter-relationships of Bitcoin and the three altcoins, which altogether have a market capitalization of nearly 80 per cent, is attempted here. In all, six rigorous tests for independence or random walk are applied on the daily returns of the coins. Bitcoin returns showed a random walk in four out of the six tests, Ethereum and Ripple in three tests, and Bitcoin Cash only in two tests. The strong symptoms of weak form of efficiency found at least in the case of Bitcoin can be considered as its acceptance as a digital wealth. While the daily returns of all the four cryptos have a long-run equilibrium, the daily prices of Bitcoin, Ethereum and Bitcoin Cash excluding Ripple showed cointegration among themselves. Nearly 88 per cent of the short-run fluctuations in Bitcoin returns are adjusted on a daily basis. Bitcoin Granger Cause Ethereum and Ripple, a bidirectional Granger Causality is found between Ripple and Ethereum. Thus, the acceptance of cryptos, especially Bitcoin, as a digital wealth option can increase in the future.
加密货币和市场效率
加密货币的指数级增长和波动性导致全球对加密资产及其作为数字财富的分布产生了兴趣。目前,加密货币和代币化黄金是两种流行的数字财富。代币化黄金有未开采的实物黄金作为后盾,而加密货币则得到了意识形态驱动的信任的支持,并得到了使用超级计算能力的挖矿过程的支持。因此,加密货币作为一种可靠的数字财富的接受程度在很大程度上取决于其价格一致性和相关的独立性。许多研究人员在2017年之前的不同时期测试了比特币的价格效率。在大多数情况下,硬币的低效率是由他们推断出来的。此外,许多研究都集中在比特币的长期和短期波动动态上,几乎没有对山寨币进行研究。因此,本文试图重新审视比特币和三种山寨币的价格效率和相互关系,这三种山寨币的市值总计接近80%。总的来说,对硬币的每日回报进行了六次严格的独立性或随机漫步测试。比特币回报在六次测试中有四次显示随机漫步,以太坊和Ripple有三次测试,比特币现金只有两次测试。至少在比特币的例子中,低效形式的强烈症状可以被认为是它被接受为一种数字财富。虽然这四种加密货币的日收益都具有长期均衡,但比特币、以太坊和比特币现金(不包括Ripple)的日价格之间表现出协整。比特币回报率的短期波动中,有近88%是按日调整的。比特币格兰杰原因以太坊和Ripple,在Ripple和Ethereum之间发现了双向格兰杰因果关系。因此,加密货币,尤其是比特币,作为一种数字财富选择的接受程度在未来可能会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信