Randomized Two-year Clinical Evaluation of Oxalic Acid in Restorations of Noncarious Cervical Lesions.

André Mattos Brito de Souza, N. L. G. Albuquerque, J. Mendonça, L. Rodrigues, S. L. Santiago
{"title":"Randomized Two-year Clinical Evaluation of Oxalic Acid in Restorations of Noncarious Cervical Lesions.","authors":"André Mattos Brito de Souza, N. L. G. Albuquerque, J. Mendonça, L. Rodrigues, S. L. Santiago","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.a37041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE To evaluate the use of oxalic acid in restorations of noncarious cervical lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty volunteers of both sexes between 24 and 55 years old, with at least two lesions that were restored with the techniques to be evaluated, were selected. Ninety teeth were randomly divided into two groups: group 1, two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive technique (control) and group 2, pretreatment with oxalic acid followed by the application of a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system. The adhesive system used was XP Bond (Dentsply) and the restorative composite resin was Durafill (Heraeus Kulzer). A modified USPHS method was employed for the clinical evaluation, taking into account the following criteria: retention (R), marginal integrity (MI), marginal discoloration (MD), postoperative sensitivity (S), caries (C), and anatomic form (AF). Clinical assessments were conducted by two examiners at baseline and after 6 months, 1 and 2 years. RESULTS After two years, the results of clinically satisfactory restorations (Alpha and Bravo) obtained for the control and experimental groups were: R (90.9%/93.33%), MI (100%/100%), MD (100%/100%), S (100%/100%), C (100%/100%), AF (100%/100%). CONCLUSION Over a 2-year period, the use of oxalic acid as an agent of dentin pretreatment did not influence the clinical performance of restorations in noncarious cervical lesions.","PeriodicalId":94234,"journal":{"name":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","volume":"28 1","pages":"467-473"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a37041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE To evaluate the use of oxalic acid in restorations of noncarious cervical lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty volunteers of both sexes between 24 and 55 years old, with at least two lesions that were restored with the techniques to be evaluated, were selected. Ninety teeth were randomly divided into two groups: group 1, two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive technique (control) and group 2, pretreatment with oxalic acid followed by the application of a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system. The adhesive system used was XP Bond (Dentsply) and the restorative composite resin was Durafill (Heraeus Kulzer). A modified USPHS method was employed for the clinical evaluation, taking into account the following criteria: retention (R), marginal integrity (MI), marginal discoloration (MD), postoperative sensitivity (S), caries (C), and anatomic form (AF). Clinical assessments were conducted by two examiners at baseline and after 6 months, 1 and 2 years. RESULTS After two years, the results of clinically satisfactory restorations (Alpha and Bravo) obtained for the control and experimental groups were: R (90.9%/93.33%), MI (100%/100%), MD (100%/100%), S (100%/100%), C (100%/100%), AF (100%/100%). CONCLUSION Over a 2-year period, the use of oxalic acid as an agent of dentin pretreatment did not influence the clinical performance of restorations in noncarious cervical lesions.
草酸在宫颈良性病变修复中的两年随机临床评价。
目的探讨草酸在宫颈良性病变修复中的应用。材料与方法选择了20名年龄在24 - 55岁之间的男女志愿者,他们至少有两个病变已经用待评估的技术修复了。90颗牙随机分为两组:1组采用两步蚀刻-冲洗粘接技术(对照组),2组采用草酸预处理,然后应用两步蚀刻-冲洗粘接系统。使用的粘接系统为XP Bond (Dentsply),修复复合树脂为Durafill (Heraeus Kulzer)。采用改良的USPHS方法进行临床评估,考虑以下标准:保留(R)、边缘完整性(MI)、边缘变色(MD)、术后敏感性(S)、龋齿(C)和解剖形态(AF)。两名检查人员分别在基线、6个月、1年和2年后进行临床评估。结果两年后,对照组和试验组临床满意的修复体(Alpha和Bravo)分别为R(90.9%/93.33%)、MI(100%/100%)、MD(100%/100%)、S(100%/100%)、C(100%/100%)、AF(100%/100%)。结论在2年的时间里,草酸作为牙本质预处理剂对宫颈非龋齿病变修复的临床效果没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信