Reflection on: “The Power and Paradoxes of Evaluation Systems – Increasing Use but Impeding Change”

Sanja Magdalenić
{"title":"Reflection on: “The Power and Paradoxes of Evaluation Systems – Increasing Use but Impeding Change”","authors":"Sanja Magdalenić","doi":"10.58235/sjpa.v25i3-4.7066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For me, evaluation is a fascinating field full of paradoxes and I welcome the fact that the article draws attention to the power and paradoxes of evaluation systems. The reflections that follow, rooted in the Swedish context, come from a PhD in sociology who has learned to love evaluation. I am privileged in that I can move across the Swedish evaluation landscape and its various fields of play such as academia, the Swedish Evaluation Society (SVUF) and the arenas that evaluation researchers tend to call “practice”. Here are my thoughts, sparked by the article, on contestability differential, evaluation systems, the paradox of epistemological coherence and the ways forward.","PeriodicalId":31772,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.v25i3-4.7066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For me, evaluation is a fascinating field full of paradoxes and I welcome the fact that the article draws attention to the power and paradoxes of evaluation systems. The reflections that follow, rooted in the Swedish context, come from a PhD in sociology who has learned to love evaluation. I am privileged in that I can move across the Swedish evaluation landscape and its various fields of play such as academia, the Swedish Evaluation Society (SVUF) and the arenas that evaluation researchers tend to call “practice”. Here are my thoughts, sparked by the article, on contestability differential, evaluation systems, the paradox of epistemological coherence and the ways forward.
反思:“评估系统的力量与悖论——增加使用但阻碍变革”
对我来说,评估是一个充满悖论的迷人领域,我欢迎这篇文章引起人们对评估系统的力量和悖论的关注。接下来的思考根植于瑞典的背景,来自一位社会学博士,他已经学会了热爱评价。我很荣幸,因为我可以在瑞典的评估领域和它的各个领域,如学术界,瑞典评估协会(SVUF)和评估研究人员倾向于称之为“实践”的领域中移动。以下是我的一些想法,这些想法是由这篇文章引发的,关于可争论性差异、评价系统、认识论一致性的悖论和前进的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信