Principles of Cancer Screening

Petrikovsky Bm
{"title":"Principles of Cancer Screening","authors":"Petrikovsky Bm","doi":"10.47829/coo.2020.3403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1968, Wilson and Jungner (WJ) put together the following criteria of screening approved by the World Health Organization (WHO) [1]. 1. The condition sought should be an important health problem. 2. There should be an accepted treatment for patients with recognized disease. 3. Facilities for diagnosis and treatment should be available. 4. There should be a recognizable latent or early symptomatic stage. 5. There should be a suitable test or examination. 6. The test should be acceptable to the population. 7. The natural history of the condition, including development from latent to declared disease, should be adequately understood. 8. There should be an agreed policy on whom to treat as patients. 9. The cost of case-finding (including diagnosis and treatment of patients diagnosed) should be economically balanced in relation to possible expenditure on medical care as a whole. 10. Case-finding should be a continuing process and not a \"once and for all\" project. Recently, the WHO officers have updated the WJ criteria taking into account recent developments in genetic and genomic medicine, among many other factors. Synthesis of emerging screening criteria proposed over the past 40 years 1. The screening program should respond to a recognized need. 2. The objectives of screening should be defined at the outset. 3. There should be a defined target population. 4. There should be scientific evidence of screening program effectiveness. 5. The program should integrate education, testing, clinical services and program management. 6. There should be quality assurance, with mechanisms to minimize potential risks of screening. 7. The program should ensure informed choice, confidentiality and respect for autonomy. 8. The program should promote equity and access to screening for the entire target population. 9. Program evaluation should be planned from the outset. 10. The overall benefits of screening should outweigh the harm. The perfect example of successful screening is cervical cancer (CC), a “fairytale” of gynecological oncology. • The HPV virus is a known cause of cervical dysplasia and cancer. CC, therefore, is a sexually transmitted disease. • CC has known precursors – various degrees of cervical dysplasia.","PeriodicalId":92766,"journal":{"name":"Clinics of oncology","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics of oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47829/coo.2020.3403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1968, Wilson and Jungner (WJ) put together the following criteria of screening approved by the World Health Organization (WHO) [1]. 1. The condition sought should be an important health problem. 2. There should be an accepted treatment for patients with recognized disease. 3. Facilities for diagnosis and treatment should be available. 4. There should be a recognizable latent or early symptomatic stage. 5. There should be a suitable test or examination. 6. The test should be acceptable to the population. 7. The natural history of the condition, including development from latent to declared disease, should be adequately understood. 8. There should be an agreed policy on whom to treat as patients. 9. The cost of case-finding (including diagnosis and treatment of patients diagnosed) should be economically balanced in relation to possible expenditure on medical care as a whole. 10. Case-finding should be a continuing process and not a "once and for all" project. Recently, the WHO officers have updated the WJ criteria taking into account recent developments in genetic and genomic medicine, among many other factors. Synthesis of emerging screening criteria proposed over the past 40 years 1. The screening program should respond to a recognized need. 2. The objectives of screening should be defined at the outset. 3. There should be a defined target population. 4. There should be scientific evidence of screening program effectiveness. 5. The program should integrate education, testing, clinical services and program management. 6. There should be quality assurance, with mechanisms to minimize potential risks of screening. 7. The program should ensure informed choice, confidentiality and respect for autonomy. 8. The program should promote equity and access to screening for the entire target population. 9. Program evaluation should be planned from the outset. 10. The overall benefits of screening should outweigh the harm. The perfect example of successful screening is cervical cancer (CC), a “fairytale” of gynecological oncology. • The HPV virus is a known cause of cervical dysplasia and cancer. CC, therefore, is a sexually transmitted disease. • CC has known precursors – various degrees of cervical dysplasia.
癌症筛检的原则
1968年,Wilson和Jungner (WJ)整理了以下经世界卫生组织(WHO)批准的筛查标准[1]。1. 所寻求的条件应该是一个重要的健康问题。2. 对于确诊的疾病,应该有一个公认的治疗方法。3.应提供诊断和治疗设施。4. 应该有一个可识别的潜伏或早期症状阶段。5. 应该有一个合适的测试或检查。6. 测试应该是大众可以接受的。7. 病情的自然历史,包括从潜伏到宣布疾病的发展,应该得到充分的了解。8. 对于把谁当作病人来对待,应该有一个商定的政策。9. 病例发现(包括诊断和治疗确诊患者)的费用应与整个医疗保健的可能支出相经济平衡。10. 病例发现应该是一个持续的过程,而不是一个“一劳永逸”的项目。最近,考虑到遗传和基因组医学的最新发展以及许多其他因素,世卫组织官员更新了世卫组织标准。过去40年提出的新兴筛查标准的综合筛查项目应回应公认的需求。2. 筛查的目标应在一开始就确定。3.应该有一个明确的目标人群。4. 筛查项目的有效性应该有科学依据。5. 该项目应整合教育、检测、临床服务和项目管理。6. 应该有质量保证,并有机制将筛查的潜在风险降到最低。7. 该计划应确保知情选择、保密和尊重自主权。8. 该计划应促进整个目标人群公平和获得筛查的机会。9. 项目评估应该从一开始就计划好。10. 筛查的总体好处应该大于坏处。宫颈癌(CC)是成功筛查的完美例子,它是妇科肿瘤学的“童话”。•HPV病毒是导致宫颈发育不良和癌症的已知原因。因此,CC是一种性传播疾病。•CC有已知的前体-不同程度的宫颈发育不良。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信