The Diabetes Team Dynamics Unraveled: A Qualitative Study

IF 2.4 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Eefje Van Nuland, I. Dumitrescu, Kristien Scheepmans, L. Paquay, Ellen De Wandeler, Kristel De Vliegher
{"title":"The Diabetes Team Dynamics Unraveled: A Qualitative Study","authors":"Eefje Van Nuland, I. Dumitrescu, Kristien Scheepmans, L. Paquay, Ellen De Wandeler, Kristel De Vliegher","doi":"10.3390/diabetology3010015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Diabetes is a complex disease requiring a multidisciplinary approach. However, the dynamics of this collaboration and the involvement of healthcare providers remain unclear. Aim(s): To explore the composition, the division of roles/tasks, and the collaboration in a diabetes team. Methods: A qualitative, explorative study with six focus groups was conducted, of which four focus groups were with healthcare providers (n = 34) and two with informal caregivers and persons with diabetes (n = 13). In addition, two in-depth interviews with doctors were performed. An iterative process of data analysis took place, guided by the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven (QUAGOL). Results: All participants confirm the importance of patient empowerment and the fact that the person with diabetes should have a central role within the team. However, this has not been achieved yet. This research gives a clear insight into the dynamics of a diabetes team. Roles and tasks are allocated according to the specific expertise and knowledge of the different healthcare providers. Interprofessional collaboration is the ultimate goal. However, the diabetes team is often formed ad hoc depending on the needs of the person with diabetes and the preferences for collaboration of the healthcare providers. Furthermore, this study revealed some important bottlenecks with regard to the knowledge of healthcare providers, persons with diabetes and their informal caregivers, the regulation and reimbursement. Discussion: Our study uncovers the dynamics of a diabetes team and its members. Healthcare providers work mainly alone, except in hospitals, where they can consult other healthcare providers briefly if necessary. Although collaboration proves to be difficult, all healthcare providers ask for a more intensive interprofessional collaboration. Conclusion: In order to improve quality of diabetes care, patient-centered care and the satisfaction of patients, informal caregivers, and healthcare providers, efforts have to be made to facilitate interprofessional collaboration. This can be achieved by sharing information via electronic shared patient records, coordination, overview, local task agreements, simplified legal regulations, and an adjusted financing system.","PeriodicalId":72798,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diabetology3010015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Diabetes is a complex disease requiring a multidisciplinary approach. However, the dynamics of this collaboration and the involvement of healthcare providers remain unclear. Aim(s): To explore the composition, the division of roles/tasks, and the collaboration in a diabetes team. Methods: A qualitative, explorative study with six focus groups was conducted, of which four focus groups were with healthcare providers (n = 34) and two with informal caregivers and persons with diabetes (n = 13). In addition, two in-depth interviews with doctors were performed. An iterative process of data analysis took place, guided by the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven (QUAGOL). Results: All participants confirm the importance of patient empowerment and the fact that the person with diabetes should have a central role within the team. However, this has not been achieved yet. This research gives a clear insight into the dynamics of a diabetes team. Roles and tasks are allocated according to the specific expertise and knowledge of the different healthcare providers. Interprofessional collaboration is the ultimate goal. However, the diabetes team is often formed ad hoc depending on the needs of the person with diabetes and the preferences for collaboration of the healthcare providers. Furthermore, this study revealed some important bottlenecks with regard to the knowledge of healthcare providers, persons with diabetes and their informal caregivers, the regulation and reimbursement. Discussion: Our study uncovers the dynamics of a diabetes team and its members. Healthcare providers work mainly alone, except in hospitals, where they can consult other healthcare providers briefly if necessary. Although collaboration proves to be difficult, all healthcare providers ask for a more intensive interprofessional collaboration. Conclusion: In order to improve quality of diabetes care, patient-centered care and the satisfaction of patients, informal caregivers, and healthcare providers, efforts have to be made to facilitate interprofessional collaboration. This can be achieved by sharing information via electronic shared patient records, coordination, overview, local task agreements, simplified legal regulations, and an adjusted financing system.
糖尿病团队动力学揭示:一项定性研究
背景:糖尿病是一种复杂的疾病,需要多学科联合治疗。然而,这种合作的动态和医疗保健提供者的参与仍然不清楚。目的:探讨糖尿病团队的组成、角色/任务分工和协作。方法:采用定性探索性研究,共设6个焦点组,其中4个焦点组为卫生保健提供者(n = 34), 2个焦点组为非正式照护者和糖尿病患者(n = 13)。此外,还对医生进行了两次深度访谈。在鲁汶定性分析指南(QUAGOL)的指导下,进行了数据分析的迭代过程。结果:所有参与者都确认了患者授权的重要性,以及糖尿病患者应该在团队中发挥核心作用的事实。然而,这一目标尚未实现。这项研究为糖尿病团队的动态提供了清晰的见解。根据不同医疗保健提供者的特定专业知识和知识分配角色和任务。跨专业合作是最终目标。然而,糖尿病小组通常是根据糖尿病患者的需要和医疗保健提供者的合作偏好而临时组建的。此外,本研究还揭示了医疗保健提供者、糖尿病患者及其非正式护理人员的知识、监管和报销方面的一些重要瓶颈。讨论:我们的研究揭示了糖尿病团队及其成员的动态。医疗保健提供者主要是单独工作,但在医院,他们可以在必要时短暂咨询其他医疗保健提供者。尽管协作被证明是困难的,但所有医疗保健提供者都要求更深入的跨专业协作。结论:为了提高糖尿病护理质量,提高以患者为中心的护理质量,提高患者、非正式护理人员和医疗保健提供者的满意度,必须努力促进跨专业合作。这可以通过通过电子共享病历、协调、概述、地方任务协议、简化的法律法规和调整后的融资系统共享信息来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信