Effect of Laparoscopic Suturing versus Bipolar Coagulation on Ovarian Reserve in Patients Undergoing Endometriotic Ovarian Cystectomy. A Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 6.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
H. Hemeda, Ahmed Y Aboelnaga, M. Elsenity
{"title":"Effect of Laparoscopic Suturing versus Bipolar Coagulation on Ovarian Reserve in Patients Undergoing Endometriotic Ovarian Cystectomy. A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"H. Hemeda, Ahmed Y Aboelnaga, M. Elsenity","doi":"10.1093/qjmed/hcad069.543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Women enter menarche with approximately 500000 primordial follicles, which slowly drop in number throughout their reproductive lifetimes.\n \n \n \n to determine which hemostatic procedure (hemostatic suture or electrocautery) may be less harmful after laparoscopic cystectomy, based on the status of the ovarian reserve.\n \n \n \n The study was conducted at Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, Obstetric and Gynecology Department, Faculty of medicine. The study population comprised females in childbearing period undergone laparoscopic endometriotic ovarian cystectomy at Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, Obstetric and Gynecology Department, Faculty of medicine.\n \n \n \n There was no statistically significant difference found between the two studied groups regarding AMH, AFC and FSH preoperative with p-value = 0.188, 0.533 and 0.812 respectively. While there was statistically significant increase in AMH and AFC in suturing group than cautery group postoperative with p-value < 0.001 and 0.005 respectively and also statistically significant decrease in FSH in suturing group than cautery group postoperative with p-value 0.004. Results of this study showed that there was statistically significant increase in the percentage of change of FSH in cautery group (61.59 ± 39.29) than suturing group (23.46 ± 17.87) with p-value < 0.001 while there was statistically significant lower rate of change in AFC and AMH in suturing group than cautery group with p-value = 0.001 and < 0.001 respectively.\n \n \n \n laparoscopic cystectomy reduces the ovarian reserve, which is more affected by hemostatic electrocoagulation than hemostatic sutures.\n","PeriodicalId":20806,"journal":{"name":"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcad069.543","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Women enter menarche with approximately 500000 primordial follicles, which slowly drop in number throughout their reproductive lifetimes. to determine which hemostatic procedure (hemostatic suture or electrocautery) may be less harmful after laparoscopic cystectomy, based on the status of the ovarian reserve. The study was conducted at Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, Obstetric and Gynecology Department, Faculty of medicine. The study population comprised females in childbearing period undergone laparoscopic endometriotic ovarian cystectomy at Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, Obstetric and Gynecology Department, Faculty of medicine. There was no statistically significant difference found between the two studied groups regarding AMH, AFC and FSH preoperative with p-value = 0.188, 0.533 and 0.812 respectively. While there was statistically significant increase in AMH and AFC in suturing group than cautery group postoperative with p-value < 0.001 and 0.005 respectively and also statistically significant decrease in FSH in suturing group than cautery group postoperative with p-value 0.004. Results of this study showed that there was statistically significant increase in the percentage of change of FSH in cautery group (61.59 ± 39.29) than suturing group (23.46 ± 17.87) with p-value < 0.001 while there was statistically significant lower rate of change in AFC and AMH in suturing group than cautery group with p-value = 0.001 and < 0.001 respectively. laparoscopic cystectomy reduces the ovarian reserve, which is more affected by hemostatic electrocoagulation than hemostatic sutures.
腹腔镜缝合与双极凝固对子宫内膜异位性卵巢切除术患者卵巢储备的影响。随机对照试验
女性进入初潮时大约有50万个原始卵泡,在整个生育期中,原始卵泡的数量会慢慢减少。根据卵巢储备的状况,确定腹腔镜膀胱切除术后哪种止血方法(止血缝合或电灼)危害较小。这项研究是在艾因沙姆斯大学妇产医院、医学院产科和妇科进行的。研究人群包括在艾因沙姆斯大学妇产科医院接受腹腔镜子宫内膜异位症卵巢囊肿切除术的育龄妇女。两组患者术前AMH、AFC、FSH差异无统计学意义,p值分别为0.188、0.533、0.812。而术后缝合组AMH、AFC较烧灼组升高有统计学意义(p值分别< 0.001、0.005);术后缝合组FSH较烧灼组降低有统计学意义(p值分别< 0.004)。结果表明:烧灼组FSH变化率(61.59±39.29)高于缝合组(23.46±17.87),p值< 0.001;AFC、AMH变化率低于烧灼组(p值分别为0.001和< 0.001),p值差异有统计学意义。腹腔镜膀胱切除术减少卵巢储备,其受止血电凝比止血缝合的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
263
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: QJM, a renowned and reputable general medical journal, has been a prominent source of knowledge in the field of internal medicine. With a steadfast commitment to advancing medical science and practice, it features a selection of rigorously reviewed articles. Released on a monthly basis, QJM encompasses a wide range of article types. These include original papers that contribute innovative research, editorials that offer expert opinions, and reviews that provide comprehensive analyses of specific topics. The journal also presents commentary papers aimed at initiating discussions on controversial subjects and allocates a dedicated section for reader correspondence. In summary, QJM's reputable standing stems from its enduring presence in the medical community, consistent publication schedule, and diverse range of content designed to inform and engage readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信