Xenophobic attitudes and representations in Social Media during Covid-19 pandemic in India

Q4 Multidisciplinary
Grace Maria Jochan, Rituparna Chakraborty, A. Arur
{"title":"Xenophobic attitudes and representations in Social Media during Covid-19 pandemic in India","authors":"Grace Maria Jochan, Rituparna Chakraborty, A. Arur","doi":"10.25112/rco.v2.2869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"    Social media activity was reported to have significantly increased during the pandemic period as most of the daily routines transformed into the digital space. On the verge of this new normality of  the post-pandemic, exploring virtual space would contribute in analysing and shaping the future digital media discourse. This paper attempted to explore the politics of representation in digital space using Foucauldian theories of power and discipline. A qualitative exploration of the xenophobic attitudes and representation was conducted on 123 young adults to understand how health concerns associated with the pandemic influenced social representations and marginalization of certain social sections and how participants recognized and understood their contribution to this group polarization. Thematic analysis of participant opinions indicated a significant change in polarization and attitude towards out-groups following the pandemic outbreak. The existing hierarchical homogenization and polarization of the marginalized moderated by polarized political affinities were found to be translated into digital space intensifying xenophobic attitudes. \nKeywords: Xenophobia, covid-19 pandemic, marginalization, social media representation.","PeriodicalId":36929,"journal":{"name":"Revista Conhecimento Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Conhecimento Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25112/rco.v2.2869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

    Social media activity was reported to have significantly increased during the pandemic period as most of the daily routines transformed into the digital space. On the verge of this new normality of  the post-pandemic, exploring virtual space would contribute in analysing and shaping the future digital media discourse. This paper attempted to explore the politics of representation in digital space using Foucauldian theories of power and discipline. A qualitative exploration of the xenophobic attitudes and representation was conducted on 123 young adults to understand how health concerns associated with the pandemic influenced social representations and marginalization of certain social sections and how participants recognized and understood their contribution to this group polarization. Thematic analysis of participant opinions indicated a significant change in polarization and attitude towards out-groups following the pandemic outbreak. The existing hierarchical homogenization and polarization of the marginalized moderated by polarized political affinities were found to be translated into digital space intensifying xenophobic attitudes. Keywords: Xenophobia, covid-19 pandemic, marginalization, social media representation.
印度Covid-19大流行期间社交媒体上的仇外态度和表征
据报道,在大流行期间,随着大多数日常活动转变为数字空间,社交媒体活动显著增加。在大流行后的新常态即将到来之际,探索虚拟空间将有助于分析和塑造未来的数字媒体话语。本文试图运用福柯的权力和纪律理论来探讨数字空间中的再现政治。对123名年轻人的仇外态度和代表性进行了定性探讨,以了解与大流行病有关的健康问题如何影响某些社会阶层的社会代表性和边缘化,以及参与者如何认识和理解他们对这种群体两极分化的贡献。对与会者意见的专题分析表明,大流行病爆发后,两极分化和对外群体的态度发生了重大变化。现有的等级制同质化和边缘化极化被两极分化的政治亲和力所缓和,被转化为数字空间,加剧了仇外态度。关键词:仇外心理,covid-19大流行,边缘化,社交媒体表征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Conhecimento Online
Revista Conhecimento Online Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信