Time-reversal space-time block coding and transmit delay diversity-separate and combined

E. Lindskog, D. Flore
{"title":"Time-reversal space-time block coding and transmit delay diversity-separate and combined","authors":"E. Lindskog, D. Flore","doi":"10.1109/ACSSC.2000.911020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we evaluate the performance of what we call here, time-reversal space-time block coding (Lindskog and Paulraj 2000) combined with transmit delay diversity (Wittneben 1991). For comparison we also report on the performance of the two schemes separate, earlier studied in Flore and Lindskog (2000). When combining the two methods we transmit from four antennas and when studying the methods separately we transmit from two antennas. The methods are evaluated in a GSM-like system using test channels from the GSM standard. The time-reversal space-time coding scheme outperforms the transmit delay diversity scheme in two manners. First it achieves a higher SNR gain and second it does not increase memory in the channel and thus does not increase the complexity of the equalizer in the receiver. The combination of the time-reversal space-time coding scheme with the transmit diversity scheme has improved performance as it achieves a higher diversity order. At a BER of 1% the transmit delay diversity and the time-reversal space-lime block coding scheme use separately transmitting from two antennas achieves a gain of 2.5 dB and 3 dB respectively, for an urban scenario and 4.0 and 5.0 dB for a rural scenario, compared to single antenna transmission. When the two methods are combined transmitting from four antennas, a gain of 4.0 dB and 6.0 dB is achieved for the urban and the rural scenarios, respectively.","PeriodicalId":10581,"journal":{"name":"Conference Record of the Thirty-Fourth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Cat. No.00CH37154)","volume":"3 1","pages":"572-577 vol.1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference Record of the Thirty-Fourth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Cat. No.00CH37154)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSSC.2000.911020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

In this paper we evaluate the performance of what we call here, time-reversal space-time block coding (Lindskog and Paulraj 2000) combined with transmit delay diversity (Wittneben 1991). For comparison we also report on the performance of the two schemes separate, earlier studied in Flore and Lindskog (2000). When combining the two methods we transmit from four antennas and when studying the methods separately we transmit from two antennas. The methods are evaluated in a GSM-like system using test channels from the GSM standard. The time-reversal space-time coding scheme outperforms the transmit delay diversity scheme in two manners. First it achieves a higher SNR gain and second it does not increase memory in the channel and thus does not increase the complexity of the equalizer in the receiver. The combination of the time-reversal space-time coding scheme with the transmit diversity scheme has improved performance as it achieves a higher diversity order. At a BER of 1% the transmit delay diversity and the time-reversal space-lime block coding scheme use separately transmitting from two antennas achieves a gain of 2.5 dB and 3 dB respectively, for an urban scenario and 4.0 and 5.0 dB for a rural scenario, compared to single antenna transmission. When the two methods are combined transmitting from four antennas, a gain of 4.0 dB and 6.0 dB is achieved for the urban and the rural scenarios, respectively.
时变空时分组编码和传输延迟分集——分离和结合
在本文中,我们评估了我们称之为时间反转空时分组编码(Lindskog and Paulraj 2000)结合传输延迟分集(Wittneben 1991)的性能。为了进行比较,我们还分别报告了Flore和Lindskog(2000)早期研究的两种方案的性能。当两种方法结合时,我们从四个天线发射;当单独研究两种方法时,我们从两个天线发射。使用来自GSM标准的测试通道,在类似GSM的系统中对这些方法进行了评估。时间反转空时编码方案在两个方面优于发射延迟分集方案。首先,它实现了更高的信噪比增益,其次,它不会增加信道中的内存,因此不会增加接收器中均衡器的复杂性。时间反转空时编码方案与发射分集方案相结合,实现了更高的分集阶,提高了性能。与单天线传输相比,在BER为1%时,分别从两个天线发射的发射延迟分集和时反转空块编码方案分别获得2.5 dB和3db的增益,用于城市场景,4.0和5.0 dB用于农村场景。当两种方法结合使用时,城市和农村场景的增益分别为4.0 dB和6.0 dB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信