The closure temperature(s) of zircon Raman dating

IF 2.7 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
B. Härtel, R. Jonckheere, B. Wauschkuhn, L. Ratschbacher
{"title":"The closure temperature(s) of zircon Raman dating","authors":"B. Härtel, R. Jonckheere, B. Wauschkuhn, L. Ratschbacher","doi":"10.5194/gchron-2020-39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Zircon Raman dating based on irradiation damage\nis a debated concept but not an established geo-/thermochronological\nmethod. One issue is the temperature range of radiation-damage annealing\nover geological timescales. We conducted isochronal and isothermal annealing\nexperiments on radiation-damaged zircons between 500 and 1000 ∘C\nfor durations between 10 min and 5 d to describe the annealing\nkinetics. We measured the widths (Γ) and positions (ω) of\nthe ν1(SiO4), ν2(SiO4), and ν3(SiO4) internal Raman bands, and the external rotation Raman\nband at ∼974, 438, 1008, and 356 cm−1 after each\nannealing step. We fitted a Johnson–Mehl–Avrami–Kolmogorov and a distributed\nactivation energy model to the fractional annealing data, calculated from\nthe widths of the ν2(SiO4), ν3(SiO4), and\nexternal rotation bands. From the kinetic models, we determined closure\ntemperatures Tc for damage accumulation for each Raman band. Tc\nranges from 330 to 370 ∘C for the internal ν2(SiO4)\nand ν3(SiO4) bands; the external rotation band is more\nsensitive to thermal annealing (Tc∼260 to\n310 ∘C). Our estimates are in general agreement with previous\nones, but more geological evidence is needed to validate the results. The\nTc difference for the different Raman bands offers the prospect of a\nmulti-closure-temperature zircon Raman thermochronometer.\n","PeriodicalId":12723,"journal":{"name":"Geochronology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochronology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2020-39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Abstract. Zircon Raman dating based on irradiation damage is a debated concept but not an established geo-/thermochronological method. One issue is the temperature range of radiation-damage annealing over geological timescales. We conducted isochronal and isothermal annealing experiments on radiation-damaged zircons between 500 and 1000 ∘C for durations between 10 min and 5 d to describe the annealing kinetics. We measured the widths (Γ) and positions (ω) of the ν1(SiO4), ν2(SiO4), and ν3(SiO4) internal Raman bands, and the external rotation Raman band at ∼974, 438, 1008, and 356 cm−1 after each annealing step. We fitted a Johnson–Mehl–Avrami–Kolmogorov and a distributed activation energy model to the fractional annealing data, calculated from the widths of the ν2(SiO4), ν3(SiO4), and external rotation bands. From the kinetic models, we determined closure temperatures Tc for damage accumulation for each Raman band. Tc ranges from 330 to 370 ∘C for the internal ν2(SiO4) and ν3(SiO4) bands; the external rotation band is more sensitive to thermal annealing (Tc∼260 to 310 ∘C). Our estimates are in general agreement with previous ones, but more geological evidence is needed to validate the results. The Tc difference for the different Raman bands offers the prospect of a multi-closure-temperature zircon Raman thermochronometer.
锆石拉曼定年闭合温度(s)
摘要基于辐照损伤的锆石拉曼测年是一个有争议的概念,但不是一种成熟的地质/热年代学方法。一个问题是辐射损伤退火在地质时间尺度上的温度范围。我们对500°c至1000°c的辐射损伤锆石进行了等时和等温退火实验,时间从10分钟到5天不等,以描述退火动力学。我们测量了ν1(SiO4), ν2(SiO4)和ν3(SiO4)内部拉曼带的宽度(Γ)和位置(ω),以及每个退火步骤后在~ 974,438,1008和356 cm−1处的外部旋转拉曼带。我们将Johnson-Mehl-Avrami-Kolmogorov模型和分布式活化能模型拟合到分数阶退火数据中,由ν2(SiO4), ν3(SiO4)和外旋带的宽度计算得出。从动力学模型中,我们确定了每个拉曼波段损伤积累的闭合温度Tc。内部ν2(SiO4)和ν3(SiO4)带的变化范围为330至370°C;外旋转带对热退火更敏感(Tc ~ 260 ~ 310°C)。我们的估计与以前的估计大体一致,但需要更多的地质证据来验证结果。不同拉曼波段的tc差异为多闭合温度锆石拉曼温度计提供了前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geochronology
Geochronology Earth and Planetary Sciences-Paleontology
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信