In vitro fertilisation from an anonymous donor: Dilemmas from the aspect of bioethics and the child's right to know his/her biological origins

Ana V. Čović, Bogdana Stjepanović
{"title":"In vitro fertilisation from an anonymous donor: Dilemmas from the aspect of bioethics and the child's right to know his/her biological origins","authors":"Ana V. Čović, Bogdana Stjepanović","doi":"10.5937/socpreg56-41240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent decades, we have witnessed significant changes in the field of family law and a changed social reality, which brought with it changes in legal regulations in international law and comparative legislation of various countries. When discussing the issues that concern human life, death, health, and in this relation the abuse of certain medical devices and treatments, it appears that the issues that give rise to the strongest controversy are the issues of euthanasia and abortion, the issue of organ donation, as well as the issues of surrogacy and in vitro fertilisation, especially in situations when the donor is anonymous. In this situation, the question of the child's right to know his/her biological origins may reasonably be raised, since this is one of his/her fundamental, guaranteed rights, the exercise of which does not depend, and can never depend, on the willingness of the state, i.e., its authorities, and individuals who participate in the birth of a child with the use of reproductive technologies. The question is raised as to whether the right to plan a family and the right to decide freely on having a child in these situations are in complete contrast with the right of the child to have access to the truth about his/her biological origins and biological parents, regardless of primary motivation for making decision on the participation in this process, this process also acquiring over time some elements of genetic engineering, and the result of which is a living being with conscience, emotional, social, and psychological needs, but also all the rights that derive from natural law, given by God, which exists independently of the legislator, that can govern any matter in a way that at a certain time (does not) correspond to a wider social consensus. The authors will present in this paper an overview of certain comparative legal solutions in this area, as well as court rulings that call into question the legality and ethics of the procedures implemented so far, as well as their consequences that we are still to face in the years to come, with the aim of establishing whether the right to decide freely on having a child in these cases and the child's right to know his/her biological origins are in complete contrast or whether these two rights may be reconciled after all.","PeriodicalId":32231,"journal":{"name":"Socioloski Pregled","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socioloski Pregled","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg56-41240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In recent decades, we have witnessed significant changes in the field of family law and a changed social reality, which brought with it changes in legal regulations in international law and comparative legislation of various countries. When discussing the issues that concern human life, death, health, and in this relation the abuse of certain medical devices and treatments, it appears that the issues that give rise to the strongest controversy are the issues of euthanasia and abortion, the issue of organ donation, as well as the issues of surrogacy and in vitro fertilisation, especially in situations when the donor is anonymous. In this situation, the question of the child's right to know his/her biological origins may reasonably be raised, since this is one of his/her fundamental, guaranteed rights, the exercise of which does not depend, and can never depend, on the willingness of the state, i.e., its authorities, and individuals who participate in the birth of a child with the use of reproductive technologies. The question is raised as to whether the right to plan a family and the right to decide freely on having a child in these situations are in complete contrast with the right of the child to have access to the truth about his/her biological origins and biological parents, regardless of primary motivation for making decision on the participation in this process, this process also acquiring over time some elements of genetic engineering, and the result of which is a living being with conscience, emotional, social, and psychological needs, but also all the rights that derive from natural law, given by God, which exists independently of the legislator, that can govern any matter in a way that at a certain time (does not) correspond to a wider social consensus. The authors will present in this paper an overview of certain comparative legal solutions in this area, as well as court rulings that call into question the legality and ethics of the procedures implemented so far, as well as their consequences that we are still to face in the years to come, with the aim of establishing whether the right to decide freely on having a child in these cases and the child's right to know his/her biological origins are in complete contrast or whether these two rights may be reconciled after all.
匿名捐赠者体外受精:生物伦理方面的困境和儿童知道自己生物起源的权利
近几十年来,我们目睹了家庭法领域的重大变化和社会现实的变化,随之而来的是国际法和各国比较立法中的法律规定的变化。在讨论与人的生命、死亡、健康有关的问题以及与此相关的某些医疗设备和治疗的滥用问题时,引起最大争议的问题似乎是安乐死和堕胎问题、器官捐赠问题以及代孕和体外受精问题,特别是在捐赠者是匿名的情况下。在这种情况下,可以合理地提出儿童了解其生物起源的权利问题,因为这是儿童的一项基本、有保障的权利,行使这项权利不取决于,也永远不取决于国家的意愿,即其当局和使用生殖技术参与儿童出生的个人。提出的问题是是否计划一个家庭的权利和自由权利决定生孩子在这些情况下完全与右边的孩子获得他/她的真相生物起源和亲生父母,无论决策的主要动机参与这个过程,这个过程也获得随着时间的推移,一些元素的基因工程,和生活的结果,这是一个有良知,情感的、社会的和心理的需要,也包括所有来自自然法的权利,这些权利是由上帝赋予的,独立于立法者而存在,可以在特定时间(不)以符合更广泛的社会共识的方式管理任何事情。作者将在本文中概述这一领域的某些比较法律解决办法,以及对迄今为止执行的程序的合法性和道德提出质疑的法院裁决,以及我们在未来几年仍将面临的后果。目的是确定在这些案件中自由决定是否生育子女的权利与儿童了解其生物起源的权利是否完全相反,或者这两项权利是否可以调和。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书