YouTube as a source of information on coccydynia

C. Uz, E. Umay
{"title":"YouTube as a source of information on coccydynia","authors":"C. Uz, E. Umay","doi":"10.5455/medscience.2023.01.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the use of YouTube for obtaining medical information has increased. In this article, we aimed to determine the usefulness, quality,and reliability of YouTube videos on coccydynia. Coccydynia and \"coccyx pain\" were searched for on YouTube on October 2, 2022. The study comprised 80 of the 120 videos that were discovered as a consequence of the search and met the inclusion criteria. The videos' videometric properties were noted. Depending on whether the content utilized information from evidence-based scientific sources,the videos were separated into two groups: useful and misleading. The measure popularity, the Video Power Index (VPI) was applied. To measure reliability, the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) was applied. To evaluate quality, the Global Quality Score (GQS) was applied. This study found that 28.7% of the video sources were from physicians and 73.8% of the videos were classified as useful, while 26.2% were classified as misleading. Videos posted by doctors and academic institutions/professional organizations were all in the useful group, while all videos uploaded by independent users and patients were in the misleading group. The useful videos had higher VPI, GQS, and mDISCERN scores, indicating that videos posted by healthcare professionals and academic institutions were more reliable and of higher quality than those from patients and independent users. The significant number of the coccydynia-related YouTube videos were reliable, useful, and of high quality. Healthcare providers should be aware of the value of YouTube's health-related content and maintain high-quality content.","PeriodicalId":18541,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Science | International Medical Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine Science | International Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2023.01.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, the use of YouTube for obtaining medical information has increased. In this article, we aimed to determine the usefulness, quality,and reliability of YouTube videos on coccydynia. Coccydynia and "coccyx pain" were searched for on YouTube on October 2, 2022. The study comprised 80 of the 120 videos that were discovered as a consequence of the search and met the inclusion criteria. The videos' videometric properties were noted. Depending on whether the content utilized information from evidence-based scientific sources,the videos were separated into two groups: useful and misleading. The measure popularity, the Video Power Index (VPI) was applied. To measure reliability, the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) was applied. To evaluate quality, the Global Quality Score (GQS) was applied. This study found that 28.7% of the video sources were from physicians and 73.8% of the videos were classified as useful, while 26.2% were classified as misleading. Videos posted by doctors and academic institutions/professional organizations were all in the useful group, while all videos uploaded by independent users and patients were in the misleading group. The useful videos had higher VPI, GQS, and mDISCERN scores, indicating that videos posted by healthcare professionals and academic institutions were more reliable and of higher quality than those from patients and independent users. The significant number of the coccydynia-related YouTube videos were reliable, useful, and of high quality. Healthcare providers should be aware of the value of YouTube's health-related content and maintain high-quality content.
YouTube是关于尾骨痛的信息来源
近年来,使用YouTube获取医疗信息的人数有所增加。在这篇文章中,我们旨在确定YouTube视频对尾骨痛的有用性、质量和可靠性。尾骨痛和“尾骨痛”于2022年10月2日在YouTube上被搜索。这项研究包括了120个视频中的80个,这些视频是通过搜索发现的,符合纳入标准。这些视频的视频测量特性被注意到了。根据内容是否利用了基于证据的科学来源的信息,这些视频被分为两组:有用的和误导性的。采用视频功率指数(Video Power Index, VPI)衡量受欢迎程度。为了测量信度,采用了改进的DISCERN (mDISCERN)。为了评价质量,采用了全球质量评分(GQS)。本研究发现,28.7%的视频来源来自医生,73.8%的视频被归类为有用,26.2%的视频被归类为误导。医生和学术机构/专业组织上传的视频均在有用组,独立用户和患者上传的视频均在误导组。有用的视频具有更高的VPI、GQS和mDISCERN分数,表明由医疗保健专业人员和学术机构发布的视频比来自患者和独立用户的视频更可靠,质量更高。大量与尾骨痛相关的YouTube视频是可靠的、有用的和高质量的。医疗保健提供者应该意识到YouTube健康相关内容的价值,并保持高质量的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信