Comparison of three culture media for one-step and two-step bioleaching of nickel and cadmium from spent Ni-Cd batteries by Aspergillus niger

T. Netpae, Sawitree Suckley
{"title":"Comparison of three culture media for one-step and two-step bioleaching of nickel and cadmium from spent Ni-Cd batteries by Aspergillus niger","authors":"T. Netpae, Sawitree Suckley","doi":"10.22104/AET.2021.4759.1286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the biological processes, bioleaching is the most widely employed method for metal extraction from electronic waste (e-waste). The purpose of this research was to evaluate the ability of one-step and two-step bioleaching under different culture media for nickel (Ni) and cadmium (Cd) removed from spent Ni-Cd batteries by the fungus Aspergillus niger. In this result, the concentrations of Ni and Cd in battery scraps from e-waste recycling shops were respectively 578.13 ± 7.02 mg Ni g-1 and 128.35 ± 11.42 mg Cd g-1. During the bioleaching process, both heavy metal removals were higher in Richards’s Broth (RB) followed by the Potato Dextrose Broth (PDB) and Malt Extract Broth (MEB), respectively. The maximum citric acid production (96.99±3.05 mM) and lower pH values were obtained in the RB medium. The bioleaching experiment showed that the recovery for the two-step leaching method was higher than the one-step bioleaching method. Following an incubation period of 21 days between the spent Ni-Cd batteries and RB medium, the two-step bioleaching experiment suggested that the citric acid products of A. niger were the best leaching agent for Ni and Cd bioleaching.","PeriodicalId":7295,"journal":{"name":"Advances in environmental science and technology","volume":"7 1","pages":"167-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in environmental science and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22104/AET.2021.4759.1286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among the biological processes, bioleaching is the most widely employed method for metal extraction from electronic waste (e-waste). The purpose of this research was to evaluate the ability of one-step and two-step bioleaching under different culture media for nickel (Ni) and cadmium (Cd) removed from spent Ni-Cd batteries by the fungus Aspergillus niger. In this result, the concentrations of Ni and Cd in battery scraps from e-waste recycling shops were respectively 578.13 ± 7.02 mg Ni g-1 and 128.35 ± 11.42 mg Cd g-1. During the bioleaching process, both heavy metal removals were higher in Richards’s Broth (RB) followed by the Potato Dextrose Broth (PDB) and Malt Extract Broth (MEB), respectively. The maximum citric acid production (96.99±3.05 mM) and lower pH values were obtained in the RB medium. The bioleaching experiment showed that the recovery for the two-step leaching method was higher than the one-step bioleaching method. Following an incubation period of 21 days between the spent Ni-Cd batteries and RB medium, the two-step bioleaching experiment suggested that the citric acid products of A. niger were the best leaching agent for Ni and Cd bioleaching.
黑曲霉一步和两步生物浸出废镍镉电池中镍镉的三种培养基的比较
生物浸出是从电子废物中提取金属的最广泛的方法是生物浸出。研究了不同培养基条件下黑曲霉对废镍镉电池中镍和镉的一步浸出和两步浸出效果。结果表明,电子垃圾回收站废旧电池中Ni和Cd的浓度分别为578.13±7.02 mg Ni g-1和128.35±11.42 mg Cd g-1。在生物浸出过程中,理查兹肉汤(RB)、马铃薯葡萄糖肉汤(PDB)和麦芽提取物肉汤(MEB)的重金属去除率均较高。在RB培养基中柠檬酸产量最高(96.99±3.05 mM), pH值较低。生物浸出试验表明,两步浸出法的回收率高于一步浸出法。用废镍镉电池与RB培养基孵育21 d,进行两步生物浸出实验,结果表明黑曲霉柠檬酸产物是镍镉生物浸出的最佳浸出剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信