What Has Hybridity Got to Do with Ecology? What Christian-Buddhist Hybridity-as-Hermeneutical-Lens Can Suggest to the Theological Conversation on Ecology

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
Julius-Kei Kato
{"title":"What Has Hybridity Got to Do with Ecology? What Christian-Buddhist Hybridity-as-Hermeneutical-Lens Can Suggest to the Theological Conversation on Ecology","authors":"Julius-Kei Kato","doi":"10.1353/bcs.2022.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This essay offers some insights that \"hybridity\" utilized as a hermeneutical paradigm might contribute to the wider theological conversations going on about the global ecological crisis. The hybridity in question here is—what can be expressed as a—\"Christian-Buddhist hybridity.\" That refers to a sensibility that seriously takes into consideration the two spiritual–religious traditions of Christianity and Buddhism as a \"hybrid way\" to view the world in general and spiritual–religious–theological themes in particular.This study will argue that, despite the significant gains in the Catholic Christian reflection on ecology achieved through Pope Francis' Laudato Si', it cannot be denied that Christian theology in general, as well as how it treats ecological themes in particular, is still fundamentally characterized by an anthropocentric focus that dualistically distinguishes too strongly between humans, on the one hand, and nature, on the other. Thus, Christian theological reflection on ecology might be helped and complemented by utilizing a nondual and unitive paradigm. One such paradigm is the Buddhist teaching on interbeing as expressed, for example, by teachers such as Thich Nhat Hanh.Moreover, the goal of hybridity (as a hermeneutical tool) is to build a world in which the thick wall between \"us\" and \"them\" can be hammered and broken down in favor of a new worldview in which the intimate connections among different worlds are highlighted and in which the presence of what we typically consider \"other\" is increasingly found within our very own selves. In that sense, Buddhism and aspects of the Dharma about Sunyata or Emptiness do seem to be a more effective means to realize hybridity's goal of overcoming and transcending the radical divide between \"us\" and \"them\" (with \"them\" in this case being \"Nature\").","PeriodicalId":41170,"journal":{"name":"Buddhist-Christian Studies","volume":"59 1","pages":"105 - 117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buddhist-Christian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/bcs.2022.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:This essay offers some insights that "hybridity" utilized as a hermeneutical paradigm might contribute to the wider theological conversations going on about the global ecological crisis. The hybridity in question here is—what can be expressed as a—"Christian-Buddhist hybridity." That refers to a sensibility that seriously takes into consideration the two spiritual–religious traditions of Christianity and Buddhism as a "hybrid way" to view the world in general and spiritual–religious–theological themes in particular.This study will argue that, despite the significant gains in the Catholic Christian reflection on ecology achieved through Pope Francis' Laudato Si', it cannot be denied that Christian theology in general, as well as how it treats ecological themes in particular, is still fundamentally characterized by an anthropocentric focus that dualistically distinguishes too strongly between humans, on the one hand, and nature, on the other. Thus, Christian theological reflection on ecology might be helped and complemented by utilizing a nondual and unitive paradigm. One such paradigm is the Buddhist teaching on interbeing as expressed, for example, by teachers such as Thich Nhat Hanh.Moreover, the goal of hybridity (as a hermeneutical tool) is to build a world in which the thick wall between "us" and "them" can be hammered and broken down in favor of a new worldview in which the intimate connections among different worlds are highlighted and in which the presence of what we typically consider "other" is increasingly found within our very own selves. In that sense, Buddhism and aspects of the Dharma about Sunyata or Emptiness do seem to be a more effective means to realize hybridity's goal of overcoming and transcending the radical divide between "us" and "them" (with "them" in this case being "Nature").
杂交与生态学有什么关系?基督教与佛教混合作为释经镜头对生态学神学对话的启示
摘要:本文提供了一些见解,即“杂交性”作为一种解释学范式可能有助于对全球生态危机进行更广泛的神学对话。这里所讨论的杂交性——可以用“基督教-佛教杂交性”来表达。这指的是一种认真考虑基督教和佛教这两种精神宗教传统的敏感性,作为一种“混合方式”来看待世界,特别是精神-宗教-神学主题。本研究将论证,尽管通过教宗方济各(Pope Francis)的“赞美你”(Laudato Si)在天主教对生态的反思方面取得了重大进展,但不可否认的是,基督教神学总体上,以及它对生态主题的处理方式,仍然从根本上以人类中心主义为特征,将人类与自然二元区分得过于强烈。因此,基督教神学对生态的反思可能会得到帮助和补充,利用一个非二元和统一的范式。其中一个范例是佛教关于互存的教导,例如由一行禅师等老师所表达的。此外,杂糅的目标(作为一种解释学工具)是建立一个世界,在这个世界中,“我们”和“他们”之间的厚墙可以被敲碎和打破,有利于一种新的世界观,在这种世界观中,不同世界之间的密切联系得到强调,在这种世界观中,我们通常认为的“他者”的存在越来越多地在我们自己的自我中被发现。从这个意义上说,佛教和关于空性或空性的佛法方面似乎是实现杂交目标的更有效手段,即克服和超越“我们”和“他们”之间的根本鸿沟(在这种情况下,“他们”是“自然”)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Buddhist-Christian Studies is a scholarly journal devoted to Buddhism and Christianity and their historical and contemporary interrelationships. The journal presents thoughtful articles, conference reports, and book reviews and includes sections on comparative methodology and historical comparisons, as well as ongoing discussions from two dialogue conferences: the Theological Encounter with Buddhism, and the Japan Society for Buddhist-Christian Studies. Subscription is also available through membership in the Society for Buddhist-Christian Studies .
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信