NOVI OBLICI NADZORA U SOCIJALNOM RADU I SOCIJALNOJ POLITICI: PRIMJER SLOVENIJE

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIAL WORK
Vesna Leskošek
{"title":"NOVI OBLICI NADZORA U SOCIJALNOM RADU I SOCIJALNOJ POLITICI: PRIMJER SLOVENIJE","authors":"Vesna Leskošek","doi":"10.3935/LJSR.V24I3.184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social work in Slovenia and elsewhere is traditionally connected to surveillance, whether directly linked to the work of the courts (juvenile courts, divorces, etc.) or authorised to disturbing people’s privacy without their consent (e.g. removing children from families, their placement in foster families, etc.). As early as in the 1970s and 1980s awareness of the power that stems from these authorisations led to specific conceptual shifts that enabled people to maintain control over their lives despite these interventions. That period saw discussions about the conflict between care and surveillance, a double or even triple mandate of social work, while later on the concepts of empowerment, advocacy, and participatory approaches have developed. The essence of these approaches was to raise awareness of the power used to establish authoritative relationships between experts and beneficiaries that did not allow for problems to be resolved because that would make beneficiaries lose control over their lives. At the moment we are facing a new type of supervision that is no longer linked to the judicial system and legal powers, but is part of social policies, which are becoming more and more repressive. These policies aim at strengthening individual responsibility and an individual’s culpability for the situation he or she is faced with. These policies especially affect the unemployed and the beneficiaries of financial allowances or some other social financial benefits. Consequently, social work is faced with new expectations regarding participation in supervision and in punishing the behaviour and identity of the beneficiary, which leads to significant gaps between theory and practice of social work.","PeriodicalId":42686,"journal":{"name":"Ljetopis Socijalnog Rada","volume":"27 1","pages":"399-414"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ljetopis Socijalnog Rada","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3935/LJSR.V24I3.184","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Social work in Slovenia and elsewhere is traditionally connected to surveillance, whether directly linked to the work of the courts (juvenile courts, divorces, etc.) or authorised to disturbing people’s privacy without their consent (e.g. removing children from families, their placement in foster families, etc.). As early as in the 1970s and 1980s awareness of the power that stems from these authorisations led to specific conceptual shifts that enabled people to maintain control over their lives despite these interventions. That period saw discussions about the conflict between care and surveillance, a double or even triple mandate of social work, while later on the concepts of empowerment, advocacy, and participatory approaches have developed. The essence of these approaches was to raise awareness of the power used to establish authoritative relationships between experts and beneficiaries that did not allow for problems to be resolved because that would make beneficiaries lose control over their lives. At the moment we are facing a new type of supervision that is no longer linked to the judicial system and legal powers, but is part of social policies, which are becoming more and more repressive. These policies aim at strengthening individual responsibility and an individual’s culpability for the situation he or she is faced with. These policies especially affect the unemployed and the beneficiaries of financial allowances or some other social financial benefits. Consequently, social work is faced with new expectations regarding participation in supervision and in punishing the behaviour and identity of the beneficiary, which leads to significant gaps between theory and practice of social work.
斯洛文尼亚和其他地方的社会工作传统上与监督有关,无论是与法院的工作(少年法庭、离婚等)直接相关,还是被授权在未经其同意的情况下干扰人们的隐私(例如,将儿童从家庭中带走,将其安置在寄养家庭中等)。早在20世纪70年代和80年代,对这些授权所产生的权力的认识就导致了具体的观念转变,使人们能够在这些干预的情况下保持对自己生活的控制。在这一时期,人们讨论了护理和监督之间的冲突,社会工作的双重甚至三重任务,后来发展了赋权、倡导和参与性方法的概念。这些办法的实质是提高人们对用来在专家和受益人之间建立权威关系的权力的认识,这种权力不允许解决问题,因为这会使受益人失去对自己生活的控制。目前,我们正面临一种新型的监督,它不再与司法系统和法律权力联系在一起,而是社会政策的一部分,而社会政策正变得越来越具有压制性。这些政策的目的是加强个人的责任和个人对他或她所面临的情况的罪责。这些政策尤其影响到失业者和经济津贴或其他一些社会经济福利的受益人。因此,社会工作在参与监督和惩罚受益者的行为和身份方面面临着新的期望,这导致了社会工作理论与实践的重大差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信