Morphine vs. Fentanyl Patient Controlled Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Control in Major Hepatic Resection Surgeries Including Living Liver Donors

Eman M S Nada, Abdulmajeed Al-Abdulkareem
{"title":"Morphine vs. Fentanyl Patient Controlled Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Control in Major Hepatic Resection Surgeries Including Living Liver Donors","authors":"Eman M S Nada, Abdulmajeed Al-Abdulkareem","doi":"10.4172/2167-0846.1000301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Liver resection surgery results in significant postoperative pain. However, it is still not clear which \n opioids used by Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) provides the best pain control and results in the least side effect \n in a patient with impaired liver function. Our hypothesis was that fentanyl is a better choice than morphine as it is a \n potent analgesic that its elimination half-life does not depend on the hepatic uptake and metabolism. \nThe Study Purpose: Is to compare Morphine and Fentanyl PCA in liver resection patients as regards the degree \n of pain control, the consumption of Opioids and the side effects. \nMethods: A retrospective case control study of hepatic resection patients who received postoperative morphine \n (Morph) or Fentanyl (Fent) (PCA). The study compared the pain scores, morphine equivalent dose (MED), the \n number of demands requested as recorded by the PCA infusion pump and the side effects every 12 hours for 48 \n hours. \nResults: The study yielded 40 patients; with the majority were living donor hepatic resection patients. There was \n no significant difference in the pain scores. However, the MED and the demands were significantly less in the Morph \n group. p value<0.000, 0.0001, 0.0005, 0,003, demands p<0.002, 0.006, 0.014, 0.013 at 12, 24, 48, 36 hours \n respectively. The overall side effects were not different between the 2 groups at all-time intervals measured, \n however Morph patients were significantly more sedated in the first 12 hours.","PeriodicalId":16641,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain and Relief","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain and Relief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0846.1000301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Liver resection surgery results in significant postoperative pain. However, it is still not clear which opioids used by Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) provides the best pain control and results in the least side effect in a patient with impaired liver function. Our hypothesis was that fentanyl is a better choice than morphine as it is a potent analgesic that its elimination half-life does not depend on the hepatic uptake and metabolism. The Study Purpose: Is to compare Morphine and Fentanyl PCA in liver resection patients as regards the degree of pain control, the consumption of Opioids and the side effects. Methods: A retrospective case control study of hepatic resection patients who received postoperative morphine (Morph) or Fentanyl (Fent) (PCA). The study compared the pain scores, morphine equivalent dose (MED), the number of demands requested as recorded by the PCA infusion pump and the side effects every 12 hours for 48 hours. Results: The study yielded 40 patients; with the majority were living donor hepatic resection patients. There was no significant difference in the pain scores. However, the MED and the demands were significantly less in the Morph group. p value<0.000, 0.0001, 0.0005, 0,003, demands p<0.002, 0.006, 0.014, 0.013 at 12, 24, 48, 36 hours respectively. The overall side effects were not different between the 2 groups at all-time intervals measured, however Morph patients were significantly more sedated in the first 12 hours.
吗啡与芬太尼患者自控镇痛在包括活体肝供者在内的肝切除术术后疼痛控制中的应用
背景:肝切除术后疼痛明显。然而,对于肝功能受损的患者,目前尚不清楚患者自控镇痛(PCA)中使用的哪种阿片类药物能提供最佳的疼痛控制和最小的副作用。我们的假设是芬太尼是比吗啡更好的选择,因为芬太尼是一种有效的镇痛药,其消除半衰期不依赖于肝脏的摄取和代谢。研究目的:比较吗啡与芬太尼PCA在肝切除术患者疼痛控制程度、阿片类药物用量及副作用。方法:对肝切除术后使用吗啡(Morph)或芬太尼(Fent) (PCA)的患者进行回顾性病例对照研究。比较各组疼痛评分、吗啡当量剂量(MED)、PCA输液泵记录的用药次数及不良反应(每12 h),持续48 h。结果:共纳入40例患者;以活体供肝切除患者居多。两组疼痛评分无显著差异。然而,Morph组的MED和需求明显减少。在12、24、48、36小时P值分别<0.000、0.0001、0.0005、0.003,需求P值分别<0.002、0.006、0.014、0.013。在测量的所有时间间隔内,两组之间的总体副作用没有差异,但Morph患者在前12小时内明显更镇静。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信