Understanding the role of cognitive effort within contextual interference paradigms: Theory, measurement, and tutorial

N. Getchell, P. Shewokis
{"title":"Understanding the role of cognitive effort within contextual interference paradigms: Theory, measurement, and tutorial","authors":"N. Getchell, P. Shewokis","doi":"10.20338/bjmb.v17i1.344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND:“Contextual interference” (CI) describes a counterintuitive phenomenon related to practice organization when learning multiple tasks that are presented in a non-repetitive order. In CI, the lack of repetitiveness introduces a high level of interference within the learning context such that task performance during initial skill acquisition is frequently poorer than if tasks are practiced in a repetitive fashion. However, these learners often perform better on retention and transfer tasks than individuals who learn within a low CI environment. \nAIM:We provide a tutorial on several novel ways in which researchers can investigate brain activity in a CI paradigm using functional near-infrared spectroscopy: Relative neural efficiency (RNE), relative neural involvement (RNI), and laterality index (LI).\nMETHOD:RNE integrates measures of cognitive effort and behavioral performance; in high CI learning environments, RNE should initially be poor (high cognitive effort, low behavioral performance), then improve during retention and transfer. RNI provides an index of the relationship among motivation, mental effort, and performance. Finally, LI allows for the exploration of lateralization between the two hemispheres of the cerebral cortex. \nRESULTS:Significant differences were found for total hemoglobin, RNE and LI for the right and left prefrontal cortex regions. The differences were accompanied by moderate-to-large effect size with random using less effort, better performance and was more oriented to goal orientation and learning processes than blocked who focused more on visuomotor attentional components and used more effort with lower behavioral performance scores.\nCONCLUSION:RNE, RNI, and LI provide innovative methods to better understand cognitive effort within CI paradigms.","PeriodicalId":91007,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian journal of motor behavior","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian journal of motor behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20338/bjmb.v17i1.344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND:“Contextual interference” (CI) describes a counterintuitive phenomenon related to practice organization when learning multiple tasks that are presented in a non-repetitive order. In CI, the lack of repetitiveness introduces a high level of interference within the learning context such that task performance during initial skill acquisition is frequently poorer than if tasks are practiced in a repetitive fashion. However, these learners often perform better on retention and transfer tasks than individuals who learn within a low CI environment.  AIM:We provide a tutorial on several novel ways in which researchers can investigate brain activity in a CI paradigm using functional near-infrared spectroscopy: Relative neural efficiency (RNE), relative neural involvement (RNI), and laterality index (LI). METHOD:RNE integrates measures of cognitive effort and behavioral performance; in high CI learning environments, RNE should initially be poor (high cognitive effort, low behavioral performance), then improve during retention and transfer. RNI provides an index of the relationship among motivation, mental effort, and performance. Finally, LI allows for the exploration of lateralization between the two hemispheres of the cerebral cortex.  RESULTS:Significant differences were found for total hemoglobin, RNE and LI for the right and left prefrontal cortex regions. The differences were accompanied by moderate-to-large effect size with random using less effort, better performance and was more oriented to goal orientation and learning processes than blocked who focused more on visuomotor attentional components and used more effort with lower behavioral performance scores. CONCLUSION:RNE, RNI, and LI provide innovative methods to better understand cognitive effort within CI paradigms.
理解认知努力在情境干扰范式中的作用:理论、测量和指导
背景:“情境干扰”(Contextual interference, CI)描述了在学习以非重复顺序呈现的多个任务时,与实践组织相关的一种反直觉现象。在CI中,缺乏重复性在学习环境中引入了高水平的干扰,因此在初始技能习得期间的任务表现往往比以重复的方式练习任务时差。然而,这些学习者通常比那些在低CI环境中学习的人在保留和迁移任务上表现得更好。目的:我们提供了一篇教程,介绍了研究人员使用功能近红外光谱在CI范式中研究大脑活动的几种新方法:相对神经效率(RNE)、相对神经受累(RNI)和偏侧指数(LI)。方法:RNE整合了认知努力和行为表现的测量;在高CI学习环境中,RNE最初应该很差(高认知努力,低行为表现),然后在保留和迁移过程中得到改善。RNI提供了动机、精神努力和表现之间关系的指标。最后,LI允许探索大脑皮层两个半球之间的侧化。结果:左、右前额皮质区总血红蛋白、RNE、LI含量差异有统计学意义。随机使用更少的努力,更好的表现,更倾向于目标取向和学习过程的差异伴随着中等到较大的效应量,而受阻组更专注于视觉运动注意成分,使用更多的努力,行为表现得分较低。结论:RNE、RNI和LI提供了创新的方法来更好地理解CI范式中的认知努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信