Validation of a tool for self-evaluating teacher digital competence

IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Mireia Usart Rodríguez, J. L. Lázaro Cantabrana, Mercè Gisbert Cervera
{"title":"Validation of a tool for self-evaluating teacher digital competence","authors":"Mireia Usart Rodríguez, J. L. Lázaro Cantabrana, Mercè Gisbert Cervera","doi":"10.5944/educxx1.27080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impressive and rapid development of society is leading to technological innovations that require new technical and cognitive skills. In particular, Teacher Digital Competence (TDC) is becoming increasingly important as an initial step towards better use of Digital Technologies (DT) in the classroom. Nevertheless, to date, future teachers on training programs have no tools to help them self-evaluate their own competence and get instant feedback on how their TDC is developing. This study subjects a TDC self-evaluation tool for initial teacher training – COMDID-A – to dimensional and external validation, in relation to age, gender and access to university. The sample consisted of 144 students on an initial teacher training program at a Catalan university. The results show that the dimensional structure proposed by the theoretical model is highly reliable and has four dimensions: 1. Didactic, curricular and methodological aspects; 2. Planning, organization and management of digital technological resources and spaces; 3. Ethical, legal and security aspects; and 4. Personal and professional development. Furthermore, significant correlations emerge between age and self-evaluation of TDC: in particular, older students self-evaluate themselves as less competent than younger students. No gender differences were observed. The outcomes of this study could provide future teachers and educational institutions with a valid and reliable tool to guide their perception and awareness of TDC development. This tool could be implemented in the formative assessment process of initial teacher training to raise students’ awareness of this competence and give them tools so that they can make significant use of DT in the classroom.","PeriodicalId":46713,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Xx1","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Xx1","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.27080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

The impressive and rapid development of society is leading to technological innovations that require new technical and cognitive skills. In particular, Teacher Digital Competence (TDC) is becoming increasingly important as an initial step towards better use of Digital Technologies (DT) in the classroom. Nevertheless, to date, future teachers on training programs have no tools to help them self-evaluate their own competence and get instant feedback on how their TDC is developing. This study subjects a TDC self-evaluation tool for initial teacher training – COMDID-A – to dimensional and external validation, in relation to age, gender and access to university. The sample consisted of 144 students on an initial teacher training program at a Catalan university. The results show that the dimensional structure proposed by the theoretical model is highly reliable and has four dimensions: 1. Didactic, curricular and methodological aspects; 2. Planning, organization and management of digital technological resources and spaces; 3. Ethical, legal and security aspects; and 4. Personal and professional development. Furthermore, significant correlations emerge between age and self-evaluation of TDC: in particular, older students self-evaluate themselves as less competent than younger students. No gender differences were observed. The outcomes of this study could provide future teachers and educational institutions with a valid and reliable tool to guide their perception and awareness of TDC development. This tool could be implemented in the formative assessment process of initial teacher training to raise students’ awareness of this competence and give them tools so that they can make significant use of DT in the classroom.
教师数字能力自我评估工具的验证
社会令人印象深刻的快速发展正在导致需要新的技术和认知技能的技术创新。特别是,教师数字能力(TDC)作为在课堂上更好地使用数字技术的第一步,正变得越来越重要。然而,到目前为止,参加培训项目的未来教师还没有工具来帮助他们自我评估自己的能力,并获得关于他们的技能发展情况的即时反馈。本研究将TDC初始教师培训自我评估工具COMDID-A与年龄、性别和大学入学机会相关,进行维度和外部验证。样本包括144名在加泰罗尼亚一所大学接受初步教师培训的学生。结果表明,理论模型提出的维度结构具有较高的可靠性,并具有四个维度:1。教学、课程和方法方面;2. 数字技术资源和空间的规划、组织和管理;3.道德、法律和安全方面;和4。个人和职业发展。此外,年龄与学习能力自我评价之间存在显著的相关关系:特别是年龄较大的学生自我评价能力低于年龄较小的学生。没有观察到性别差异。本研究的结果可为未来教师和教育机构提供一个有效和可靠的工具,以指导他们对TDC发展的认知和认识。该工具可在教师初始培训的形成性评估过程中实施,以提高学生对这一能力的认识,并为他们提供工具,使他们能够在课堂上大量使用DT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educacion Xx1
Educacion Xx1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊介绍: Educación XX1, revista editada por la Facultad de Educación de la Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, difunde ensayos, investigaciones y experiencias innovadoras enmarcadas en cualquiera de los contextos y ámbitos de intervención educativos. Educación XX1es una publicación científica arbitrada por pares (doble ciego) centrada en temas pedagógicos que contribuyen al avance de la educación. A partir de las últimas tendencuas de la politica educativa y de la producción científica, Educación XX1 centra prioritariamente su objetivo en la publicación de articulos relativos a: La educación superior: tendencias, fundamentos, metodologías, evaluación, gobernanza, etc. Buenas prácticas en intervención educativa en la educación superior. Calidad e innovación en la formación del profesorado.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信