Prevalence and determinants of pesticide use in informal households in Mulago II parish, Kampala Uganda

Kibuule Dan, Kagoya Harriet Rachel
{"title":"Prevalence and determinants of pesticide use in informal households in Mulago II parish, Kampala Uganda","authors":"Kibuule Dan, Kagoya Harriet Rachel","doi":"10.5897/JTEHS2014.0337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The indiscriminate use of pesticides in developing countries has impacted negatively on the environment and public health. Despite that informal households in Uganda carry a high pest burden, the safe use and disposal of pesticides is poorly studied. We determined the prevalence and pesticide use practices among the informal households in Mulago, a suburb of Kampala city. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among heads of informal households in Mulago II parish, using a semi-structured interview questionnaire. Out of the 56 households in the parish, twenty 20 household met the inclusion criterion for an informal household. Household heads were interviewed on the pest burden and the practices on safe use and disposal of pesticides. Data was analyzed using SPSSv21 software; the chi-square test was used for Univariate analysis. The mean pest burden per household was 4 ± 0.7 pests: mosquitoes 20 (100%), bedbugs 18 (90%; p < 0.001), rats and houseflies 16 (80%; p = 0.007), and cockroaches 15 (75%; p = 0.025). Most households, 17 (85%, p = 0.002) had used a pesticide within the last 2 weeks. The most commonly used pesticides were synthetic pyrethroid in form of aerosols 18 (90%) or insecticide coils 10 (50%) and organophosphate solutions 15 (75%). Pesticides were applied on walls 15 (75%; p < 0.001) and in open air 12 (60%; p = 0.086). Pesticides were stored in lockable cupboards in 6 (30%; p = 0.645) households. The use of pesticides was associated with having livestock, cost of pesticide and the burden of pest infestation. Informal households in Mulago parish have a high pest burden and usage of pesticides. The use, storage and disposal of pesticides are largely inappropriate. Public health interventions that promote the access to quality and safe use of pesticides at informal households are critical. \n \n   \n \n Keywords: Prevalence, Pesticide Use, determinants of pesticide, Uganda.","PeriodicalId":17507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences","volume":"47 1","pages":"52-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/JTEHS2014.0337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The indiscriminate use of pesticides in developing countries has impacted negatively on the environment and public health. Despite that informal households in Uganda carry a high pest burden, the safe use and disposal of pesticides is poorly studied. We determined the prevalence and pesticide use practices among the informal households in Mulago, a suburb of Kampala city. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among heads of informal households in Mulago II parish, using a semi-structured interview questionnaire. Out of the 56 households in the parish, twenty 20 household met the inclusion criterion for an informal household. Household heads were interviewed on the pest burden and the practices on safe use and disposal of pesticides. Data was analyzed using SPSSv21 software; the chi-square test was used for Univariate analysis. The mean pest burden per household was 4 ± 0.7 pests: mosquitoes 20 (100%), bedbugs 18 (90%; p < 0.001), rats and houseflies 16 (80%; p = 0.007), and cockroaches 15 (75%; p = 0.025). Most households, 17 (85%, p = 0.002) had used a pesticide within the last 2 weeks. The most commonly used pesticides were synthetic pyrethroid in form of aerosols 18 (90%) or insecticide coils 10 (50%) and organophosphate solutions 15 (75%). Pesticides were applied on walls 15 (75%; p < 0.001) and in open air 12 (60%; p = 0.086). Pesticides were stored in lockable cupboards in 6 (30%; p = 0.645) households. The use of pesticides was associated with having livestock, cost of pesticide and the burden of pest infestation. Informal households in Mulago parish have a high pest burden and usage of pesticides. The use, storage and disposal of pesticides are largely inappropriate. Public health interventions that promote the access to quality and safe use of pesticides at informal households are critical.   Keywords: Prevalence, Pesticide Use, determinants of pesticide, Uganda.
乌干达坎帕拉Mulago II教区非正规家庭中农药使用的流行率和决定因素
发展中国家滥用农药对环境和公众健康产生了负面影响。尽管乌干达非正规家庭的有害生物负担很高,但对农药的安全使用和处置的研究很少。我们确定了坎帕拉市郊穆拉戈非正规家庭的流行率和农药使用情况。采用半结构化访谈问卷,对穆拉戈第二教区的非正式家庭户主进行了横断面调查。在教区的56户家庭中,有20户家庭符合非正式家庭的纳入标准。对户主进行了关于有害生物负担以及安全使用和处置农药的做法的访谈。数据分析采用SPSSv21软件;单因素分析采用卡方检验。每户平均有害生物负担为4±0.7只:蚊虫20只(100%),臭虫18只(90%);P < 0.001),大鼠和家蝇16 (80%;P = 0.007),蟑螂15只(75%;P = 0.025)。大多数家庭,17个(85%,p = 0.002)在过去两周内使用过农药。最常用的杀虫剂是合成拟除虫菊酯喷雾18(90%)或蚊香10(50%)和有机磷溶液15(75%)。15面墙(75%)施用农药;P < 0.001),露天12例(60%;P = 0.086)。6(30%)的农药储存在可锁的橱柜中;P = 0.645)。农药的使用与饲养牲畜、农药成本和虫害负担有关。穆拉戈教区非正规家庭的病虫害负担和农药使用量都很高。农药的使用、储存和处置在很大程度上是不适当的。促进非正规家庭获得高质量和安全使用农药的公共卫生干预措施至关重要。关键词:流行,农药使用,农药决定因素,乌干达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信