Anna Barbauld and Charlotte Smith on War and Acquiescence

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE
A. Lincoln, J. Richardson, Mary A. Favret, A. Vickery, Anne M. Thell, Thomas Keymer, M. Rabb, Ala Alryyes, L. Mugglestone, Neil Ramsey
{"title":"Anna Barbauld and Charlotte Smith on War and Acquiescence","authors":"A. Lincoln, J. Richardson, Mary A. Favret, A. Vickery, Anne M. Thell, Thomas Keymer, M. Rabb, Ala Alryyes, L. Mugglestone, Neil Ramsey","doi":"10.1215/00982601-8718688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay considers works published by two women writers as Britain was preparing for hostilities against revolutionary France in 1793: a Fast Day sermon, Sins of Government, Sins of the Nation, published anonymously by Anna Barbauld, Charlotte Smith's novel The Old Manor House, and her blank verse poem The Emigrants. It considers how these works, which condemn the guilt arising from war, expose the problem of necessary acquiescence in what is condemned. Taken together, the writings illuminate two sides of the problem. As a Dissenter, Barbauld belonged to a social group that, during the early years of the French revolution, had reason to feel especially vulnerable to the threat of civil disorder; she therefore had a particular incentive to see the horrors of war abroad in relation to the fear of social unrest at home. For Smith, who identified herself publicly with the landowning classes, and who desired socially appropriate positions for her children, such horrors had to be set against the material opportunities made available by war. In both cases the representation of sympathy for the victims of war provides a way out of the moral impasse they encounter.","PeriodicalId":43296,"journal":{"name":"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY LIFE","volume":"5 1","pages":"1 - 118 - 119 - 139 - 140 - 159 - 160 - 164 - 165 - 191 - 29 - 30 - 50 - 51 - 7 - 74 - 75 - 8 - 95 -"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY LIFE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00982601-8718688","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This essay considers works published by two women writers as Britain was preparing for hostilities against revolutionary France in 1793: a Fast Day sermon, Sins of Government, Sins of the Nation, published anonymously by Anna Barbauld, Charlotte Smith's novel The Old Manor House, and her blank verse poem The Emigrants. It considers how these works, which condemn the guilt arising from war, expose the problem of necessary acquiescence in what is condemned. Taken together, the writings illuminate two sides of the problem. As a Dissenter, Barbauld belonged to a social group that, during the early years of the French revolution, had reason to feel especially vulnerable to the threat of civil disorder; she therefore had a particular incentive to see the horrors of war abroad in relation to the fear of social unrest at home. For Smith, who identified herself publicly with the landowning classes, and who desired socially appropriate positions for her children, such horrors had to be set against the material opportunities made available by war. In both cases the representation of sympathy for the victims of war provides a way out of the moral impasse they encounter.
安娜·巴鲍德和夏洛特·史密斯论战争与默许
摘要:本文考察了1793年英国准备对抗法国革命时期两位女作家发表的作品:安娜·巴鲍德匿名出版的《斋戒日布道》、《政府之罪》、《国家之罪》、夏洛特·史密斯的小说《老庄园》和她的无韵诗《移民》。它考虑了这些作品是如何谴责由战争引起的罪行,揭示了对被谴责的东西的必要默许的问题。总的来说,这些著作阐明了这个问题的两个方面。作为一个持不同政见者,巴博尔德属于一个社会群体,在法国大革命的早期,有理由感到特别容易受到内乱的威胁;因此,她有一种特别的动机,将国外战争的恐怖与对国内社会动荡的恐惧联系起来。史密斯公开承认自己是地主阶级的一员,她希望自己的孩子能获得社会上适当的地位,对她来说,这种恐怖必须与战争提供的物质机会相结合。在这两种情况下,对战争受害者的同情为他们提供了一条摆脱道德僵局的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Committed to interdisciplinary exchange, Eighteenth-Century Life addresses all aspects of European and world culture during the long eighteenth century, 1660–1815. The most wide-ranging journal of eighteenth-century studies, it also encourages diverse methodologies—from close reading to cultural studies—and it always welcomes suggestions for review essays, special issues, and innovative approaches. Among Eighteenth-Century Life’s noteworthy regular features are its film forums, its review essays, its book-length special issues, and the longest and most eclectic lists of books received of any journal in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书