A LEGITIMIDADE ATIVA DO MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO PARA AS DEMANDAS DE PROTEÇÃO À FAUNA: UM APORTE NA TUTELA PREVENTIVA CONTRA PRÁTICAS CRUÉIS EM ANIMAIS DOMÉSTICOS E DOMESTICÁVEIS

Rachel CARDOSO TINOCO DE GÓES
{"title":"A LEGITIMIDADE ATIVA DO MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO PARA AS DEMANDAS DE PROTEÇÃO À FAUNA: UM APORTE NA TUTELA PREVENTIVA CONTRA PRÁTICAS CRUÉIS EM ANIMAIS DOMÉSTICOS E DOMESTICÁVEIS","authors":"Rachel CARDOSO TINOCO DE GÓES","doi":"10.35265/2236-6717-234-12622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work aims to analyze the importance of the Public Prosecutor’s Office performance to fauna’s protection, especially with regards to domestic and domesticable animals. The paper has the goal to examine the active legitimacy of that public office, from the perspective of constitutional theory and civil proceduralism, to conclude for the existence, or not, of an extraordinary legitimacy so as to obtain the animal protection referred in the 1988’s Federal Constitution, focusing on Preventive Injunctions for that purpose. The logical-deductive method was the used methodological procedure, with the research techniques of bibliographical review (with focus on specialised literature, scientific articles, academic works and analysis of legislation) to make conclusions on the legitimacy of the Public Prosecutor’s Office to the Class Actions for the protection of domestic and domesticable animals, with special attention for the use of Preventive Injunctions.","PeriodicalId":21289,"journal":{"name":"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35265/2236-6717-234-12622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work aims to analyze the importance of the Public Prosecutor’s Office performance to fauna’s protection, especially with regards to domestic and domesticable animals. The paper has the goal to examine the active legitimacy of that public office, from the perspective of constitutional theory and civil proceduralism, to conclude for the existence, or not, of an extraordinary legitimacy so as to obtain the animal protection referred in the 1988’s Federal Constitution, focusing on Preventive Injunctions for that purpose. The logical-deductive method was the used methodological procedure, with the research techniques of bibliographical review (with focus on specialised literature, scientific articles, academic works and analysis of legislation) to make conclusions on the legitimacy of the Public Prosecutor’s Office to the Class Actions for the protection of domestic and domesticable animals, with special attention for the use of Preventive Injunctions.
检察官对野生动物保护要求的积极合法性:对防止家畜和可驯养动物的残忍行为的预防性保护作出贡献
这项工作旨在分析公共检察官办公室的表现对动物保护的重要性,特别是关于家畜和驯养动物。本文的目的是从宪法理论和民事程序主义的角度考察该公职的积极合法性,得出结论,是否存在一种特殊的合法性,从而获得1988年联邦宪法中提到的动物保护,重点是为此目的的预防性禁令。逻辑演绎法是使用的方法论程序,其研究方法是参考文献审查(重点是专业文献、科学文章、学术著作和立法分析),以得出关于公共检察官办公室对保护家畜和可驯养动物的集体诉讼的合法性的结论,特别注意使用预防性禁令。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信